Veille CVE

Recherche « Redhat jboss enterprise application platform »

50 CVE

  1. CVE-2026-89059 7.5 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.6.redhat · Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.4.redhat · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 · Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3

    A flaw was found in RESTEasy's IIOImageProvider, which decodes attacker-supplied image request bodies without enforcing any limit on the declared image dimensions or pixel count. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a small crafted image declaring enormous dimensions to trigger a very large memory allocation, exhausting the JVM heap and resulting in a denial of service.

  2. CVE-2026-89058 7.4 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.6.redhat · Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.4.redhat · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 · Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3

    A flaw was found in RESTEasy's CorsFilter, which, when configured to allow all origins ("*"), reflects the request's Origin header back in the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response together with Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true. This permissive cross-origin policy allows a malicious website to make credentialed cross-origin requests and read authenticated responses from a victim's session, resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

  3. CVE-2026-18967 8.1 Élevée

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 · Redhat build of keycloak

    A flaw was found in the SAML broker component of Keycloak, an identity and access management solution. When configured as a SAML broker using the IdP-Initiated flow, Keycloak fails to enforce the OneTimeUse condition in SAML assertions. This allows an attacker who captures a valid, unused assertion to replay it multiple times. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to hijack a user's session and gain unauthorized access to the system as that user.

  4. CVE-2026-16442 9.8 Critique

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the SAML broker component of Keycloak, which is used to manage identity federation and user authentication. The issue occurs because the IdP-initiated Single Sign-On endpoint fails to check if a provider is restricted to account linking only. This allows an attacker with control over a linked upstream identity to bypass login restrictions and gain full access to a local user account.

  5. CVE-2026-16102 8.1 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) component of Keycloak, an identity and access management solution. The default DCR policy fails to properly validate the claim path for User Property mappers, allowing them to write values to sensitive internal claim locations. An attacker with a standard user account and a limited Initial Access Token can exploit this to forge administrative roles in their access token. This allows the attacker to take over other clients, steal confidential secrets, and potentially gain full administrative control over the realm.

  6. CVE-2026-16100 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the user-event metrics recording of Keycloak. When metrics are enabled, the system records raw error messages from failed account operations as Prometheus metric labels. Because these error messages can include user-supplied input like nonexistent client IDs, an authenticated user can create a massive number of unique metric entries, eventually exhausting system memory and causing the service to crash or become unavailable.

  7. CVE-2026-16071 5.4 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the LDAP storage provider of Keycloak, which is used to federate user identities from external directories. The issue occurs when a delegated administrator performs a search using a specific LDAP entry Distinguished Name (DN). Due to missing validation, the system allows lookups for users located outside the configured search boundary, leading to the disclosure of account information from unauthorized parts of the directory and unintended importing of those users into local storage.

  8. CVE-2026-15573 8.1 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in Keycloak's Authorization Services. The component responsible for matching request paths to security policies (PathMatcher) does not properly normalize URIs before comparison. By adding extra characters like a trailing slash or matrix parameters to a URL, an attacker can trick the system into applying a less restrictive security policy than intended. This allows an authenticated user to access administrative or restricted areas they should not have permission to see.

  9. CVE-2026-16443 9.1 Critique

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the SAML metadata import functionality of the keycloak-services component, which is the core engine for identity brokering in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. When importing identity provider metadata that lacks specific usage attributes for keys, the system incorrectly disables signature validation for SAML responses even if a signing certificate is provided. This issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge a SAML response and gain unauthorized access to a user account by knowing their external identifier.

  10. CVE-2026-18569 3.7 Faible

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw was found in the backchannel logout endpoint of the keycloak-services component, which is part of the Red Hat Build of Keycloak. This component handles authentication and session management for applications. The issue occurs when an OIDC identity provider is configured to skip signature validation. In this specific setup, the system incorrectly accepts logout requests that have no cryptographic signature. An attacker who knows certain technical details about a user's session can use this flaw to force that user to be logged out, potentially disrupting their work.

  11. CVE-2026-18573 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which is used for managing authentication and authorization flows. The issue occurs when a realm administrator configures client policies to enforce specific authentication requirements on confidential clients. Due to improper evaluation of the client state during an update operation, an attacker with client management permissions can bypass these security policies by first creating a public client and then updating it to a confidential client with weaker authentication. This can result in the persistence of clients that do not comply with the intended security hardening of the realm.

  12. CVE-2026-18572 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    Keycloak provides authorization services that allow administrators to restrict access to resources based on time policies (for example, only allowing access during business hours). A flaw was discovered where a user can include a fake time value in their authorization request that overrides the actual server time. This allows the user to bypass these time-based restrictions and access protected resources at unauthorized times.

  13. CVE-2026-18571 7.2 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the user creation component of Keycloak when Fine-Grained Admin Permissions V2 (FGAP V2) is enabled. This issue allows a sub-administrator with permission to create users to add those users to any group, even groups the sub-administrator is not authorized to manage. This could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information or elevated privileges for the newly created users.

  14. CVE-2026-18570 5.4 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the full-scope-disabled client-policy executor within the keycloak-services component. This component is responsible for enforcing security policies during client registration and configuration in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue occurs because the executor only validates the fullScopeAllowed field when it is explicitly provided in a request. By omitting this field, a delegated user can bypass the policy, resulting in a client created with full scope access. This allows the client to obtain tokens with unauthorized role mappings.

  15. CVE-2026-18218 5.4 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the TokenManager component of the Keycloak identity management service. When an administrator attempts to revoke tokens for a specific application (client) using a "not-before" policy, the revocation may be silently ignored if the overall security realm already has an older, non-zero revocation policy in place. This issue can allow previously issued tokens to remain valid for refreshing sessions and accessing user information even after an administrator has attempted to invalidate them. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  16. CVE-2026-18217 4.7 Moyenne

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw was found in the SAML protocol implementation of Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. The issue occurs when Keycloak handles SAML authentication requests using the HTTP-Redirect binding. If a client is configured with a wildcard redirect URL, an attacker can craft a request that includes malicious parameters. When a user authenticates, Keycloak appends its legitimate response to the attacker's parameters. This can cause some service providers to process the attacker's data instead of the real login information, potentially leading to a user being logged into the wrong account.

  17. CVE-2026-18215 8.1 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    Keycloak provides a way to let users log in using Microsoft accounts while restricting access to a specific organization (tenant). A flaw was discovered where this restriction is ignored when using the token exchange feature. This means an attacker with a valid Microsoft token from a completely different organization could gain access to the Keycloak realm, potentially accessing sensitive data or performing unauthorized actions.

  18. CVE-2026-18214 8.1 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    Keycloak allows users to log in using Google accounts and can be configured to only allow users from specific Google Workspace domains. A flaw was found where the token exchange feature, which allows swapping a Google token for a Keycloak token, does not check these domain restrictions. This means an attacker with a valid Google account from a different domain could bypass the security check and gain access to the Keycloak realm.

  19. CVE-2026-18211 5.4 Moyenne

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw was found in the secure-client-uris client policy executor within Keycloak core services. This component is responsible for enforcing security requirements on client configurations, such as requiring encrypted connections for redirect URIs. Due to an improper check that only looks at the start of a web address rather than properly verifying the host, an attacker can bypass these security restrictions by using a specially crafted domain name. This could allow an attacker to intercept sensitive authentication codes over unencrypted connections.

  20. CVE-2026-18209 4.7 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which handles OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication flows. The issue occurs because the security check designed to prevent HTTP parameter pollution only inspects the query portion of a redirect URL and ignores the fragment portion. When a client is configured with a wildcard redirect URI, an attacker can use this to inject duplicate security parameters into the login response. If a client application is not configured correctly, it might trust the attacker's injected data instead of the real security information from Keycloak, leading to session fixation or account confusion.

  21. CVE-2026-18208 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw was found in the OIDC token introspection endpoint of the keycloak-services component. Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution used to secure modern applications and services. The issue occurs when a confidential client, configured to receive signed JWT introspection responses, attempts to introspect a token issued for a different audience. Although the endpoint correctly identifies the token as inactive for that client, it still returns the full set of token claims within a signed JWT field. This allows an unauthorized client to bypass audience-based restrictions and access sensitive information contained in the token.

  22. CVE-2026-18206 3.7 Faible

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which provides identity and access management services. The issue occurs when a realm administrator uses a wildcard domain (like *.example.com) to restrict which hosts can register or update clients. Due to improper validation, the system accepts any hostname that ends with the specified domain suffix, even if it is not a legitimate subdomain. An attacker who can control the reverse DNS of their connection can bypass these host-based restrictions, potentially allowing unauthorized client modifications.

  23. CVE-2026-18203 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw was found in the group policy evaluation logic of Keycloak, an identity and access management solution. When a group policy is set to extend permissions to child groups, the system incorrectly uses a simple text-based prefix check to verify group membership. This allows a user who belongs to a different group with a similar starting name to bypass security checks and gain unauthorized access to administrative functions or protected resources.

  24. CVE-2026-16105 4.9 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the RoleContainerResource component of Keycloak. The issue occurs because certain name-based endpoints in the admin REST API do not properly enforce authorization checks when managing composite roles. This allows a delegated administrator with manage-realm permissions to remove essential child roles from built-in admin roles, potentially disrupting administrative functions within a realm.

  25. CVE-2026-18207 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw was found in the client policy enforcement mechanism of Keycloak. The issue occurs when the system checks group membership by name instead of a unique identifier. An attacker with client management privileges could bypass security policies by joining a group with a matching name in a different part of the group hierarchy, potentially allowing them to register or update clients without following required security hardening profiles.

  26. CVE-2026-18201 5.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    Keycloak provides a way to manage identity providers and organizations through its administrative API. A flaw was discovered where an administrator with permission to manage identity providers could link a new provider to an organization without having the required permissions to manage that organization. This could allow an unauthorized administrator to influence how users log into specific organizations.

  27. CVE-2026-17059 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the role-users endpoint of the keycloak-services library, which is the core component of the Keycloak identity and access management solution. The issue occurs because the system fails to check if an administrator has permission to view individual users when listing members of a role. This allows a restricted administrator to see private information, such as names and email addresses, for users they should not be able to access.

  28. CVE-2026-17048 4.9 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.6 · Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8

    A flaw was found in the Keycloak Admin REST API, which is used to manage security realms and clients. The issue occurs when the system processes requests for rotated client secrets that are stored in a secure vault. Due to improper boundary enforcement, a delegated administrator with view-only permissions can retrieve the actual resolved secret instead of the vault placeholder, leading to the exposure of sensitive credentials.

  29. CVE-2026-16108 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the default-groups REST endpoint and realm representation of Keycloak. This component is responsible for managing groups that are automatically assigned to new users within a realm. The issue allows a delegated administrator with realm-viewing permissions to see the names and identifiers of hidden default groups, even if they lack the specific permissions to view those groups. This can lead to the exposure of sensitive organizational structures or internal group names.

  30. CVE-2026-16106 4.9 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the admin REST API of Keycloak, a solution for identity and access management. The issue occurs when a delegated administrator attempts to remove a child role from a composite role. Due to missing authorization checks, an attacker with limited administrative permissions can remove privileged roles they are not authorized to manage, leading to a loss of access for other users and administrators.

  31. CVE-2026-16104 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the authentication configuration endpoint of the keycloak-services component, which is the core engine for Red Hat Build of Keycloak identity and access management. The issue occurs because the system fails to mask sensitive configuration values, such as reCAPTCHA secret keys, when they are requested by administrators with view-only permissions. This can lead to the exposure of third-party service credentials to unauthorized personnel or through administrative logs.

  32. CVE-2026-16103 4.3 Moyenne

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak. This issue is an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-9798, where brute-force protection checks were added to the Client-Initiated Backchannel Authentication (CIBA) initiation handler but were omitted from the token redemption handler. This allows an attacker with valid client credentials to obtain access and refresh tokens for a user account that has been locked due to brute-force protection, provided the authentication request was started before the lockout occurred and was approved by the user.

  33. CVE-2026-16093 5.4 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    Keycloak provides a mechanism called Client Policies to enforce security requirements on clients, such as requiring them to use signed JWTs for authentication. A flaw was discovered where this enforcement can be bypassed. An attacker with valid client credentials can provide a fake, unsigned assertion header that tricks the system into thinking the policy requirements have been met. This allows the attacker to authenticate using simpler methods like a client secret even when the administrator has mandated more secure, signed assertions.

  34. CVE-2026-16089 5.9 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue occurs because OAuth 2.0 authorization codes are not properly bound to the client that originally requested them. An attacker who can intercept an authorization code can modify it to be redeemed by their own client, potentially allowing them to obtain access tokens for a victim's identity.

  35. CVE-2026-16072 4.9 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the organization management component of Keycloak. A delegated administrator with permission to manage organizations can create an invitation for a non-existent email address and then retrieve the secret registration link directly through the application programming interface. By using this link, the administrator can create new user accounts and add them to the organization without having the required user management permissions or access to the invited email account. This allows an administrator to bypass security boundaries and add unauthorized members to an organization.

  36. CVE-2026-15943 5.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw was found in the Keycloak keycloak-services component, which handles the management of identity providers. The issue occurs when a delegated administrator updates an OIDC identity provider using a masked client secret sentinel value. Due to improper validation, Keycloak reuses the existing real secret even if security-sensitive fields like the token URL have been changed, allowing an attacker to redirect and capture the secret.

  37. CVE-2026-15945 2.7 Faible

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7 · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in the group search functionality of the Keycloak server's administrative API. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) v2 is enabled, a delegated administrator can bypass access restrictions to view parent groups they are not authorized to see. By searching for a child group they have permission to view, the system incorrectly returns the full details of the parent group in the response, leading to the disclosure of sensitive group attributes and configuration.

  38. CVE-2026-1609 8.1 Élevée

    Keycloak · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Redhat build of keycloak

    A flaw was found in Keycloak. When the JSON Web Token (JWT) authorization grant preview feature is enabled and a user account is disabled, Keycloak fails to validate the user’s disabled status during JWT authorization grant processing. A remote attacker with low privileges can exploit this improper access control vulnerability by presenting a valid assertion token from an external identity provider to obtain a JWT for a disabled user. This allows unauthorized access to sensitive resources.

  39. CVE-2026-14781 4.8 Moyenne

    Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw exists in the org.keycloak.broker.oidc package where the OIDC broker incorrectly synchronizes the email_verified claim. When an OIDC identity provider is configured with trustEmail=true and the userinfo endpoint is enabled, Keycloak retrieves the email address from the userinfo response but retrieves the email_verified status exclusively from the id_token. The root cause is a lack of validation ensuring that the email_verified claim in the id_token actually refers to the email address returned by the userinfo endpoint. If these two sources return different email addresses, the id_token's email_verified=true claim is blindly applied to the userinfo email. Exploitation Conditions: The OIDC identity provider must have trustEmail set to true (non-default). The userinfo endpoint must be enabled (default). The attacker must control or have compromised the upstream OIDC provider. Concrete Impact: Mark arbitrary email addresses as verified in the Keycloak database. Bypass email-based security controls or verification workflows. Potential account takeover if the application relies solely on the email_verified flag from the IdP to link accounts.

  40. CVE-2026-14614 5.4 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the ClientResource component of Keycloak's admin services when Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) v2 is enabled. This issue allows a delegated administrator, who should only have limited control over specific clients, to attach or remove hidden client scopes that they are not authorized to see or manage. As a result, an attacker could inject unauthorized data or permissions into the security tokens issued to end-users, potentially tricking other applications into granting higher levels of access than intended.

  41. CVE-2026-14613 4.9 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.6 · Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8

    A vulnerability was discovered in Keycloak's administrative interface that allows certain administrators to see information about groups they shouldn't have access to. When the new Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP v2) are turned on, an administrator who is allowed to see a specific "role" can also see a list of all groups assigned to that role. The system fails to check if the administrator has permission to see those specific groups. This could allow a restricted administrator to discover "hidden" groups and see their details, such as internal names and custom settings, which might contain sensitive deployment information.

  42. CVE-2026-14209 4.3 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A vulnerability was discovered in Keycloak's Admin UI extension that allows certain administrative users to bypass security restrictions. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAPv2) are enabled, an administrator who should only be able to search for users (but not view their full details) can use a specific "brute-force-user" endpoint to access a user's full profile. This includes sensitive information and security metadata. The issue occurs because the system fails to check if the administrator has the required "view" permission for that specific user when using this particular search path.

  43. CVE-2026-11800 8.1 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.4 · Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat Data Grid 8

    A flaw was found in Keycloak. This JWT algorithm confusion vulnerability in the JWT Authorization Grant flow allows an attacker with valid client credentials to bypass signature verification. By forging an assertion, the attacker can create unauthorized access tokens. This enables the attacker to impersonate any federated user linked to the affected Identity Provider, leading to unauthorized access and potential privilege escalation.

  44. CVE-2026-9800 8.1 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6

    A flaw was found in Keycloak Policy Enforcer. This vulnerability allows any authenticated user to bypass all authorization policies, including role, scope, and User-Managed Access (UMA) permission checks. By including the configured access-denied page path within a request URL, either as a path segment or a query parameter, an attacker can gain unauthorized access to protected resources.

  45. CVE-2026-11986 4.9 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Redhat build of keycloak

    A flaw was found in the admin-ui-ext component of Keycloak, which provides extended administrative user interface capabilities. The issue occurs because certain bulk role-removal endpoints fail to perform granular permission checks when deleting role mappings. This allows a delegated administrator with limited permissions to remove highly privileged roles from other users or groups, potentially disrupting administrative access control.

  46. CVE-2026-46625 7.5 Élevée

    js-cookie · Red Hat Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.1

    JavaScript Cookie is a JavaScript API for handling cookies, client-side. Prior to version 3.0.7, js-cookie's internal assign() helper copies properties with for...in + plain assignment. When the source object is produced by JSON.parse, the JSON object's "__proto__" member is an own enumerable property, so the for…in enumerates it and the target[key] = source[key] write triggers the Object.prototype.__proto__ setter on the fresh target ({}). The result is a per-instance prototype hijack: Object.prototype itself is untouched, but the merged attributes object now inherits attacker-controlled keys. Because the consuming set() function then enumerates the merged object with another for...in, every key the attacker placed on the polluted prototype lands in the resulting Set-Cookie string as an attribute pair. The attacker can set domain=, secure=, samesite=, expires=, and path= on cookies whose attributes the developer thought were locked down. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.7.

  47. CVE-2026-41731 8.1 Élevée

    Spring for Apache Kafka · Red Hat Fuse 7 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack · Vmware spring for apache kafka

    JsonKafkaHeaderMapper and the deprecated DefaultKafkaHeaderMapper matched type headers against trusted packages using a prefix check, meaning that trusting any package implicitly trusted all of its subpackages. Combined with Jackson's default bean deserialization, a producer could supply crafted header values that caused the consumer to deserialize arbitrary JDK types. Affected versions: Spring for Apache Kafka 4.0.0 through 4.0.5; 3.3.0 through 3.3.15; 3.2.0 through 3.2.13; 2.9.0 through 2.9.13; 2.8.0 through 2.8.11.

  48. CVE-2025-71319 7.5 Élevée

    image-size · Red Hat Discovery 2 · Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.4 · Red Hat Gatekeeper 3

    image-size through 2.0.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows remote attackers to permanently block the Node.js event loop by supplying a specially crafted image buffer with a zero-valued size field in a recognized box-type. Attackers can trigger an infinite loop in the JXL or HEIF image parsers by providing a crafted image containing a box with a size of zero, causing the offset to never advance and permanently hanging the application.

  49. CVE-2026-4628 4.3 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.12 · Red Hat Build of Keycloak · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack

    A flaw was found in Keycloak. An improper Access Control vulnerability in Keycloak’s User-Managed Access (UMA) resource_set endpoint allows attackers with valid credentials to bypass the allowRemoteResourceManagement=false restriction. This occurs due to incomplete enforcement of access control checks on PUT operations to the resource_set endpoint. This issue enables unauthorized modification of protected resources, impacting data integrity.

  50. CVE-2010-1428 7.5 Élevée Exploitée Rançongiciel

    Redhat jboss enterprise application platform

    The Web Console (aka web-console) in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via an unspecified request that uses a different method.