Veille CVE

Recherche « Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 »

15 CVE

  1. CVE-2026-16442 9.8 Critique

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the SAML broker component of Keycloak, which is used to manage identity federation and user authentication. The issue occurs because the IdP-initiated Single Sign-On endpoint fails to check if a provider is restricted to account linking only. This allows an attacker with control over a linked upstream identity to bypass login restrictions and gain full access to a local user account.

  2. CVE-2026-15572 8.8 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in Keycloak's Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) security policy management. The "Allowed Protocol Mapper Types" policy, which restricts which types of data mappers a client can use, fails to re-validate the mapper type during a client update if the mapper's configuration remains unchanged. An attacker with client registration privileges can exploit this by first registering an allowed mapper type with a malicious configuration and then swapping it for a restricted, high-privilege mapper type (such as one that hardcodes administrative roles). This allows the attacker to gain full administrative access to the Keycloak realm.

  3. CVE-2026-16102 8.1 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) component of Keycloak, an identity and access management solution. The default DCR policy fails to properly validate the claim path for User Property mappers, allowing them to write values to sensitive internal claim locations. An attacker with a standard user account and a limited Initial Access Token can exploit this to forge administrative roles in their access token. This allows the attacker to take over other clients, steal confidential secrets, and potentially gain full administrative control over the realm.

  4. CVE-2026-16071 5.4 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the LDAP storage provider of Keycloak, which is used to federate user identities from external directories. The issue occurs when a delegated administrator performs a search using a specific LDAP entry Distinguished Name (DN). Due to missing validation, the system allows lookups for users located outside the configured search boundary, leading to the disclosure of account information from unauthorized parts of the directory and unintended importing of those users into local storage.

  5. CVE-2026-15573 8.1 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in Keycloak's Authorization Services. The component responsible for matching request paths to security policies (PathMatcher) does not properly normalize URIs before comparison. By adding extra characters like a trailing slash or matrix parameters to a URL, an attacker can trick the system into applying a less restrictive security policy than intended. This allows an authenticated user to access administrative or restricted areas they should not have permission to see.

  6. CVE-2026-16443 9.1 Critique

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the SAML metadata import functionality of the keycloak-services component, which is the core engine for identity brokering in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. When importing identity provider metadata that lacks specific usage attributes for keys, the system incorrectly disables signature validation for SAML responses even if a signing certificate is provided. This issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge a SAML response and gain unauthorized access to a user account by knowing their external identifier.

  7. CVE-2026-14615 2.7 Faible

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) v2 implementation within Keycloak's administrative services. When FGAP v2 is enabled, the system fails to properly filter child groups based on the caller's specific permissions when requested through a parent group. This allows a delegated administrator to view details of child groups they are not authorized to access directly, including group names, paths, and custom attributes.

  8. CVE-2026-14614 5.4 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in the ClientResource component of Keycloak's admin services when Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) v2 is enabled. This issue allows a delegated administrator, who should only have limited control over specific clients, to attach or remove hidden client scopes that they are not authorized to see or manage. As a result, an attacker could inject unauthorized data or permissions into the security tokens issued to end-users, potentially tricking other applications into granting higher levels of access than intended.

  9. CVE-2026-4629 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5 · Redhat build of keycloak

    A flaw was found in Keycloak. A highly privileged user with `manage-clients` permission can exploit this vulnerability by injecting a hardcoded role mapper into any client. This action allows the user to bypass existing scope restrictions and inject the `realm-admin` role into generated tokens, resulting in privilege escalation and full administrative access to the realm.

  10. CVE-2026-14209 4.3 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A vulnerability was discovered in Keycloak's Admin UI extension that allows certain administrative users to bypass security restrictions. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAPv2) are enabled, an administrator who should only be able to search for users (but not view their full details) can use a specific "brute-force-user" endpoint to access a user's full profile. This includes sensitive information and security metadata. The issue occurs because the system fails to check if the administrator has the required "view" permission for that specific user when using this particular search path.

  11. CVE-2026-9800 8.1 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6

    A flaw was found in Keycloak Policy Enforcer. This vulnerability allows any authenticated user to bypass all authorization policies, including role, scope, and User-Managed Access (UMA) permission checks. By including the configured access-denied page path within a request URL, either as a path segment or a query parameter, an attacker can gain unauthorized access to protected resources.

  12. CVE-2026-54513 8.1 Élevée

    FasterXML jackson-databind · Red Hat Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1

    jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.10.0 until 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4, BasicPolymorphicTypeValidator.Builder.allowIfSubTypeIsArray() allowlists any array type based only on clazz.isArray(), without validating the array's component (element) type against the configured allowlist. A PTV built with allowIfSubTypeIsArray() plus an explicit concrete-type allowlist therefore still permits EvilType[] even though EvilType is not allowlisted. When Jackson deserializes the elements and no per-element type IDs are present, it instantiates the component type directly with no further PTV check, bypassing the allowlist. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4.

  13. CVE-2026-9798 4.3 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. When a user account is temporarily locked due to repeated failed login attempts, an attacker with valid client credentials can exploit the Client-Initiated Backchannel Authentication (CIBA) flow to bypass this brute-force protection. This allows continued authentication attempts and token issuance even when the account should be locked, potentially enabling further unauthorized access attempts.

  14. CVE-2026-9793 7.5 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in Keycloak. When a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) encrypted request object is submitted, Keycloak may incorrectly process unsigned claims if the decrypted content is raw JSON, bypassing the configured signature policy. This allows a remote attacker to submit unauthorized claims, leading to a compromise of data integrity within the OpenID Connect (OIDC) authorization flow. While a redirect URI allowlist acts as a compensating control, this vulnerability violates OIDC Core and Financial-grade API (FAPI) signing requirements.

  15. CVE-2026-9689 4.2 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.14 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 · Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5

    A flaw was found in Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. When a client application is configured to accept broad redirect Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs), a remote attacker can manipulate the authentication process by crafting a special web address. If a user clicks this link, the client application might incorrectly prioritize attacker-controlled information over legitimate data. This vulnerability, known as HTTP parameter pollution, could allow an attacker to bypass security measures or gain unauthorized access to resources.