Recherche « Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 »
48 CVE
-
CVE-2026-89060 7.7 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16
A cross-namespace authorization flaw in multicluster-observability-addon allows a user with permission to modify a managed cluster’s ManagedClusterAddOn configuration to reference ClusterLogForwarder or OpenTelemetryCollector resources outside the permitted namespace. If those resources reference Secrets, the add-on may copy the referenced Secrets to the attacker-controlled managed cluster.
-
CVE-2026-73137 7.7 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-subscription component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (RHACM). A tenant with HelmRelease create permissions can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the `secretRef.Namespace` field. This allows the `GetSecret()` function in the HelmRelease controller to fetch sensitive credentials from any namespace, which are then sent to an attacker-controlled Helm repository. This can lead to the exfiltration of credentials from arbitrary namespace Secrets, resulting in information disclosure.
-
CVE-2026-67567 9.9 Critique
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-subscription component. This vulnerability allows a tenant, who has the ability to create HelmRelease custom resources (CRs), to bypass existing security controls. The system's HelmRelease controller processes Helm chart templates using its own elevated ServiceAccount privileges without proper validation. This enables the tenant to deploy arbitrary resources across the entire cluster, leading to a significant security compromise.
-
CVE-2026-76827 6.8 Moyenne
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in search-indexer. This vulnerability allows a registered and authenticated managed cluster to tamper with or delete another cluster's indexed search data. This is possible because the delta-sync write paths in search-indexer do not properly restrict UPDATE/DELETE operations to data owned by the calling cluster. An attacker could exploit this by crafting specific user identifiers (UIDs) with a different cluster's prefix.
-
CVE-2026-76139 8.0 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in acm-operator-bundle. The build process for this component downloads and runs a script from a remote source without verifying its authenticity or integrity. This script gains access to sensitive credentials, such as GitHub access tokens and registry passwords, used in the build environment. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious code, leading to unauthorized access to build resources and potential compromise of the resulting operator bundle.
-
CVE-2026-70496 9.9 Critique
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in search-v2-operator. The operator's ClusterRole has permissions equivalent to a cluster administrator, allowing it to impersonate other entities, write Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) configurations, approve Certificate Signing Requests (CSRs), and manage ManifestWork. This grants excessive privileges beyond what is necessary for the operator's intended function, potentially leading to privilege escalation within the cluster.
-
CVE-2026-18874 6.2 Moyenne
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in volsync-addon-controller. This vulnerability allows an attacker to inject malicious YAML (Yet Another Markup Language) code into the OpenShift Lifecycle Manager (OLM) Subscription resource. This is due to improper escaping of annotation values when they are rendered into YAML. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized modification or control over OLM Subscription configurations, potentially impacting software management within the cluster. This issue primarily affects systems where the 'volsync-addon-deploy-type: olm' annotation is explicitly enabled.
-
CVE-2026-71470 9.1 Critique
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the search-v2-operator. This vulnerability allows a privileged user, specifically a Custom Resource (CR) editor, to manipulate Search CR fields such as imageOverride, arguments, and environment variables without proper validation. By exploiting this, an attacker can mount arbitrary secrets into a search container's environment or replace the container image with an attacker-controlled one. This leads to privilege escalation and can result in a full cluster compromise due to the ServiceAccount's extensive impersonation permissions.
-
CVE-2026-66780 6.5 Moyenne
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the submariner-operator component. The `submariner-k8s-broker-cluster` Role, which is assigned to joined clusters, possesses excessive permissions. This allows a compromised cluster to alter network configurations, specifically by overwriting other clusters' endpoint information. Consequently, an attacker can redirect inter-cluster tunnel traffic, enabling a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack across the entire cluster mesh.
-
CVE-2026-66781 5.4 Moyenne
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the Submariner operator. The Submariner Custom Resource (CR), used for configuring network connectivity, stores the IPsec pre-shared key (PSK) in an unencrypted format. This key, which is critical for securing communication between Kubernetes clusters, can be accessed by unauthorized parties. Such access enables an attacker to passively decrypt network traffic flowing between any two clusters in the mesh, resulting in sensitive information disclosure.
-
CVE-2026-75485 5.5 Moyenne
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the must-gather component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes. The cluster Proxy object is dumped in raw form, bypassing the oc inspect redaction that would normally sanitize sensitive fields. This exposes proxy basic-auth credentials in the must-gather archive, potentially disclosing sensitive authentication information to anyone with access to the archive.
-
CVE-2026-73834 5.5 Moyenne
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the must-gather component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes. Certain ACM wrapper Custom Resources that embed Secret data are collected without redaction. When an administrator runs must-gather, credentials and tokens are captured in cleartext in the resulting archive, potentially exposing sensitive information to anyone with access to the archive.
-
CVE-2026-66793 8.8 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the governance-policy-addon-controller component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes. A user with permissions to annotate the namespaced ManagedClusterAddOn resource can override the governance-policy container image. This allows an attacker to run a controlled image with cluster-admin privileges on the managed cluster, leading to arbitrary code execution and privilege escalation.
-
CVE-2026-71472 9.1 Critique
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in acm-search-v2-rhel9. This vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker, such as a hub administrator or a Search Custom Resource (CR) editor, to inject malicious shell commands or SQL statements. This occurs because the WORK_MEM string provided in the Search CR is not properly validated before being used in a bash script and an SQL query. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution within the privileged postgres pod, potentially compromising the system.
-
CVE-2026-70495 8.8 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in search-v2-operator. This component's `search-serviceaccount` has overly broad permissions, allowing it to impersonate users and groups across the entire cluster. If an attacker gains access to any of the pods running under this service account, they could exploit this to achieve `system:masters` access, granting them full control over the cluster.
-
CVE-2026-66792 9.9 Critique
Red Hat Multicluster Global Hub 1.4.9 · Red Hat Multicluster Global Hub 1.5.8 · Red Hat Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.6 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11
A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-subscription component. This vulnerability allows a user on a managed cluster to escalate their privileges by creating a Subscription with specific, crafted annotations. Successful exploitation grants the attacker the ability to deploy resources into any namespace with the elevated permissions of the controller's Service Account, potentially leading to unauthorized access and control over cluster resources.
-
CVE-2026-71846 6.5 Moyenne
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in insights-client. The component's ServiceAccount is bound to a ClusterRole granting cluster-wide secrets get, list, and watch permissions, while the code only requires access to a single specific Secret. This excessive privilege means that a compromise of the insights-client pod or ServiceAccount token would grant an attacker read access to all Secrets across the hub cluster, including managed-cluster kubeconfigs and other sensitive credentials.
-
CVE-2026-71473 8.5 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the `search-v2-operator` component. A user with specific administrative permissions on a managed cluster can exploit a vulnerability that allows them to inject arbitrary configuration data. This manipulation can override critical settings, leading to the replacement of container images. This ultimately results in container image injection on the managed cluster, potentially compromising its integrity.
-
CVE-2026-71471 9.0 Critique
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in acm-search-v2-rhel9. An attacker with administrative privileges on the hub cluster, specifically with patch access to the Search Custom Resource (CR), could exploit a vulnerability in the `Collector.ImageOverride` field. This allows the attacker to deploy an arbitrary container image across all managed clusters. The consequence is remote code execution (RCE), enabling the attacker to execute commands and potentially access sensitive information across the entire fleet of managed clusters.
-
CVE-2026-71469 7.5 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in search-v2-api. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this by sending requests with unique random bearer tokens. Each unique token creates a permanent entry in the unbounded tokenReviews cache, which is not properly cleared. This can lead to memory exhaustion of the search-api pod, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
-
CVE-2026-72508 9.9 Critique
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-subscription component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (RHACM). This vulnerability allows a namespace-admin tenant to perform a confused-deputy attack by creating Subscription Custom Resources (CRs) that leverage a highly privileged ServiceAccount (SA). This enables the tenant to deploy arbitrary cluster-scoped resources, leading to privilege escalation and potential arbitrary code execution across the cluster.
-
CVE-2026-73122 7.7 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-channel component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (RHACM). This vulnerability allows a compromised agent from a managed cluster to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information. Specifically, the agent can read all Secrets and ConfigMaps within any Channel namespace on the hub, potentially exposing credentials for other tenants' Git and Helm repositories. This could lead to significant information disclosure.
-
CVE-2026-72526 9.9 Critique
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the multicloud-integrations component. The Application propagation controller processes the `ocm-managed-cluster` annotation from an Application Custom Resource (CR) without proper validation. A tenant with permissions to create Applications on the hub cluster can exploit this to target arbitrary managed clusters. This can force ArgoCD on the spoke clusters to synchronize attacker-controlled manifests, leading to arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation on those clusters.
-
CVE-2026-70398 9.6 Critique
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in multicloud-integrations, a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (RHACM). This vulnerability allows an authenticated user, referred to as a tenant, to manipulate the GitOpsCluster controller. By exploiting this, a tenant can redirect sensitive spoke cluster bearer tokens from secure locations to a namespace they control. This unauthorized access to tokens can lead to the disclosure of critical information and bypass security policies within ArgoCD AppProjects.
-
CVE-2026-66878 7.7 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in multicloud-operators-subscription. A privileged user, specifically a namespace administrator capable of creating Channel and Subscription resources, can exploit this vulnerability. By manipulating the Channel.Spec.SecretRef.Namespace field, the user can cause the system to copy sensitive Secret contents from other namespaces into their own, leading to information disclosure.
-
CVE-2026-64927 6.4 Moyenne
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-channel component. This vulnerability allows a user with specific permissions to manipulate how the system handles sensitive information, known as Secrets, across different parts of the system (namespaces). By exploiting this, an attacker can modify these Secrets in unauthorized areas. This could lead to unauthorized access to information or elevated privileges within the system.
-
CVE-2026-71845 7.7 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in insights-client. The setDefault() function logs the value of every environment variable it processes, including CCX_TOKEN, a bearer credential used in disconnected cluster deployments. When glog verbosity is set to level 2 or higher, the token is written in clear text to the pod log on every startup. An attacker with access to pod logs or centralized logging could obtain the credential, leading to unauthorized access to the CCX API.
-
CVE-2026-71475 6.8 Moyenne
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16
A flaw was found in insights-client. A compromised managed cluster, referred to as a 'spoke', can inject unencoded data into the Insights API URL path. This occurs because the ClusterID, which is controlled by the spoke, is used directly in the request path without proper validation or URL encoding. This vulnerability allows a malicious spoke to redirect authenticated requests to unintended API endpoints, potentially leading to information disclosure or unauthorized access.
-
CVE-2026-71474 7.1 Élevée
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in insights-client. When the application receives a non-200 response, it logs the request headers, which can include the cloud.openshift.com pull-secret token. A local user with access to pod logs on the hub could read this long-lived credential. This information disclosure could grant unauthorized access to Red Hat cloud services.
-
CVE-2026-71468 5.3 Moyenne
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in acm-search-v2-api-rhel9. When the `getFederationConfig` function refreshes its cache, it improperly reuses a user's bearer token for all subsequent federated requests until the cache expires. This allows other authenticated users to gain unauthorized access to remote managed hub search results, leading to information disclosure.
-
CVE-2026-10090 9.0 Critique
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 · Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15
A flaw was found in the Application Subscription controller (multicluster-operators-subscription) of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes (ACM). A user with namespace-scoped "edit" privileges in an ACM hub namespace can create a Channel resource pointing to a Helm repository they control and a Subscription resource referencing it. The app-subscription controller fetches and applies the Helm chart contents with its own elevated authority, without verifying whether the subscription creator holds the "open-cluster-management:subscription-admin" role and without restricting applied resources to the subscription namespace. This allows the attacker to include cluster-scoped resources in the Helm chart, such as a ClusterRoleBinding granting the attacker's ServiceAccount the "cluster-admin" ClusterRole. Successful exploitation results in full cluster-admin privilege escalation. This contradicts the ACM documentation which states that non-subscription-admin users should have resources deployed into the subscription namespace only.
-
CVE-2026-44990 9.3 Critique
apostrophecms sanitize-html · Red Hat multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.1 · Red Hat multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11 · Red Hat multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.17
ApostropheCMS is an open-source Node.js content management system, and sanitize-html provides a simple HTML sanitizer with a clear API. Under the default configuration, versions of `sanitize-html` prior to 2.17.4 can turn attacker-controlled content inside a disallowed `xmp` element into live HTML or JavaScript. This is a sanitizer bypass in the default `disallowedTagsMode: 'discard'` path and can lead to stored XSS in applications that render sanitized output back to users. Version 2.17.4 patches the issue.
-
CVE-2026-12143 7.5 Élevée
form-data · Red Hat Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1
form-data is a library for creating readable multipart/form-data streams. In versions through 4.0.5, the `field` argument to `FormData#append` and the `filename` option are concatenated verbatim into the `Content-Disposition` header without escaping carriage return (CR), line feed (LF), or double-quote (") characters. An application that passes attacker-controlled data as a field name or filename (for example, an API gateway that turns JSON object keys into multipart field names) allows the attacker to terminate the header line and inject additional headers, or to smuggle entire additional multipart parts, into the request the application forwards to a backend. This can let the attacker add or override form fields (e.g. set `is_admin=true`) seen by the downstream parser. This is an instance of CWE-93 (CRLF injection). The fix escapes CR, LF, and `"` as `%0D`, `%0A`, and `%22` in field names and filenames, matching the serialization browsers use per the WHATWG HTML multipart/form-data encoding algorithm. Exploitation requires the consuming application to use untrusted input as a field name or filename; applications that use only fixed/trusted field names are not affected. Fixed in 2.5.6, 3.0.5, and 4.0.6.
-
CVE-2026-44496 7.5 Élevée
axios · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Axios versions before 0.32.0 on the 0.x line and before 1.16.0 on the 1.x line build a regular expression from the configured XSRF cookie name without escaping regex metacharacters. In standard browser environments, an attacker who can influence the cookie name passed to axios can cause expensive regex backtracking while axios reads document.cookie. The practical impact is client-side availability degradation, such as freezing the affected browser tab while axios prepares a request. The issue does not affect ordinary Node.js HTTP adapter usage, React Native, or web workers, where axios does not read document.cookie. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0 and 1.16.0.
-
CVE-2026-44495 7.7 Élevée
axios · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9
Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 0.19.0 to before 0.31.1 and 1.15.2, Axios contains prototype-pollution gadgets in request config processing. If another vulnerability in the same JavaScript process has already polluted Object.prototype.transformResponse, affected Axios versions may treat that inherited value as request configuration or as an option validator. Axios does not itself create the prototype pollution. Exploitability requires a separate prototype-pollution vulnerability or equivalent attacker control over Object.prototype before Axios creates a request. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.31.1 and 1.15.2.
-
CVE-2026-44494 8.7 Élevée
axios · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 1.0.0 to before 1.16.0, the Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution in the application's dependency tree to be escalated into a full Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack — intercepting, reading, and modifying all HTTP traffic including authentication credentials. The HTTP adapter at lib/adapters/http.js:670 reads config.proxy via standard property access, which traverses the prototype chain. Because proxy is not present in Axios defaults, the merged config object has no own proxy property, making it trivially injectable via prototype pollution. Once injected, setProxy() routes all HTTP requests through the attacker's proxy server. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.16.0.
-
CVE-2026-44492 8.6 Élevée
axios · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 0.32.0 and 1.16.0, Axios does not normalise IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. When NO_PROXY lists an IPv4 address such as 127.0.0.1 or 169.254.169.254, a request URL using the IPv4-mapped IPv6 form (::ffff:7f00:1, ::ffff:a9fe:a9fe) still routes through the configured proxy. Node.js resolves these addresses to the underlying IPv4 host, so the request reaches the internal service via the proxy rather than being blocked. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0 and 1.16.0.
-
CVE-2026-44488 7.5 Élevée
axios · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Axios versions 1.7.0 through 1.15.x did not enforce configured request and response size limits when requests were sent with the fetch adapter. Applications that selected adapter: 'fetch', or ran in environments where axios resolved to the fetch adapter, could receive or send bodies larger than maxContentLength or maxBodyLength despite those limits being explicitly configured. This can cause resource exhaustion in server-side usage when a malicious or compromised server returns an oversized response, when an attacker can supply a large data: URL, or when an application forwards attacker-controlled request bodies through axios while relying on maxBodyLength as a boundary. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0 and 1.16.0.
-
CVE-2026-44487 7.5 Élevée
axios · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 0.32.0 and 1.16.0, Axios’s Node.js HTTP adapter may forward a Proxy-Authorization header to a redirected origin during specific proxy-to-direct redirect flows. This affects Node.js usage, where an initial HTTP request is sent through an authenticated HTTP proxy, redirects are followed, and the redirected URL is no longer proxied. Under affected redirect shapes, the final origin can receive the proxy credential that was intended only for the outbound proxy. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0 and 1.16.0.
-
CVE-2026-44486 7.5 Élevée
axios · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 0.32.0 and 1.16.0, Axios’ Node.js HTTP adapter can leak proxy credentials to a redirect target in affected versions. When a request is sent through an authenticated proxy, Axios may add a Proxy-Authorization header. If Axios then follows a redirect and the redirected request is no longer sent through that proxy, the stale Proxy-Authorization header can remain on the redirected request and be sent to the redirect target. This affects Node.js's use of Axios with automatic redirects enabled and an authenticated proxy configuration. Browser adapters are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0 and 1.16.0.
-
CVE-2026-45447 8.8 Élevée
OpenSSL · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Extended Lifecycle Support - EXTENSION · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support
Issue summary: A specially crafted PKCS#7 or S/MIME signed message could trigger a use-after-free during PKCS#7 signature verification. Impact summary: A use-after-free may result in process crashes, heap corruption, or potentially remote code execution. When processing a PKCS#7 or S/MIME signed message, if the SignedData digestAlgorithms field is present as an empty ASN.1 SET, OpenSSL may incorrectly free a caller-owned BIO during PKCS7_verify(). A subsequent use of the BIO by the calling application results in a use-after-free condition. In the common case this occurs when the application later calls BIO_free() on the BIO originally passed to PKCS7_verify(). Depending on allocator behavior and application-specific BIO usage patterns, this may result in a crash or other memory corruption. In some application contexts this may potentially be exploitable for remote code execution. Applications that process PKCS#7 or S/MIME signed messages using OpenSSL PKCS#7 APIs may be affected. Applications using the CMS APIs for this processing are not affected. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
-
CVE-2026-46385 7.5 Élevée
iskorotkov avro · Red Hat Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 · Red Hat Multicluster Global Hub 1.4.5 · Red Hat Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.5
iskorotkov/avro is a fast Go Avro codec. Prior to 2.33.0, the Avro array and map decoders looped over an attacker-controlled block-count value without checking the underlying reader's error state inside the loop body. Reader.ReadBlockHeader returns the count as a Go int, which is 64-bit on amd64 / arm64 targets — so a producer can declare a block of up to math.MaxInt64 (~9.2 × 10¹⁸) elements followed by EOF (or any truncated payload), and the decoder will attempt that many no-op iterations before propagating the error. The realistic ceiling is "indefinite until the worker is killed externally" — a single hostile payload pins a CPU core until the process is OOM-killed, deadline-cancelled, or terminated. Remote, unauthenticated denial-of-service. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.33.0.
-
CVE-2026-46384 7.5 Élevée
iskorotkov avro · Red Hat Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 · Red Hat Multicluster Global Hub 1.4.5 · Red Hat Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.5
iskorotkov/avro is a fast Go Avro codec. Prior to 2.33.0, several Avro decoder paths read attacker-controlled 64-bit values from the wire format and either narrowed them to platform-sized int before bounds-checking, or summed them with overflow-prone signed-int arithmetic. On 32-bit targets (GOARCH=386, arm, mips, wasm, etc.), the truncation paths can silently bypass byte-slice limits, select the wrong union branch, or hit the OCF negative-make panic via wrap. Three sub-issues are not 32-bit-specific: cumulative-size arithmetic overflow in arrayDecoder.Decode / mapDecoder.Decode / mapDecoderUnmarshaler.Decode (wraps at math.MaxInt64 on amd64 / arm64 and bypasses MaxSliceAllocSize / MaxMapAllocSize), math.MinInt negation in block-header handling, and make([]byte, size) with a negative size in OCF block reads — all three panic or bypass caps on any platform, giving an attacker a denial-of-service primitive there. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.33.0.
-
CVE-2026-46595 10.0 Critique
golang.org/x/crypto/ssh · Red Hat Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 · Red Hat RHEM 1.0 for RHEL 9 · Red Hat RHEM 1.1 for RHEL 10
Previously, CVE-2024-45337 fixed an authorization bypass for misused ssh server configurations; if any other type of callback is passed other than public key, then the source-address validation would be skipped.
-
CVE-2026-42508 9.1 Critique
golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/knownhosts · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
Previously, a revoked 'SignatureKey' belonging to a CA was not correctly checked for revocation. Now, both the 'key' and 'key.SignatureKey' are checked for @revoked.
-
CVE-2026-43869 7.3 Élevée
Apache Software Foundation Apache Thrift · Red Hat Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 · Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 3.33 for Quarkus 3.33.2.SP1 · Red Hat Multicluster Global Hub 1.3.4
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Apache Thrift. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.23.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.23.0, which fixes the issue.
-
CVE-2026-42154 7.5 Élevée
prometheus · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Prometheus is an open-source monitoring system and time series database. Prior to versions 3.5.3 and 3.11.3, the remote read endpoint (/api/v1/read) does not validate the declared decoded length in a snappy-compressed request body before allocating memory. An unauthenticated attacker can send a small payload that causes a huge heap allocation per request. Under concurrent load this can exhaust available memory and crash the Prometheus process. This issue has been patched in versions 3.5.3 and 3.11.3.
-
CVE-2026-42151 7.5 Élevée
prometheus · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Prometheus is an open-source monitoring system and time series database. Prior to versions 3.5.3 and 3.11.3, the client_secret field in the Azure AD remote write OAuth configuration (storage/remote/azuread) was typed as string instead of Secret. Prometheus redacts fields of type Secret when serving the configuration via the /-/config HTTP API endpoint. Because the field was a plain string, the Azure OAuth client secret was exposed in plaintext to any user or process with access to that endpoint. This issue has been patched in versions 3.5.3 and 3.11.3.