Semaine du 19 octobre au 25 octobre 2026
3 281 CVE
-
CVE-2026-96378 – Non évaluée
Drupal Commerce Decoupled Checkout
Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Decoupled Checkout allows Object Injection. This issue affects Commerce Decoupled Checkout versions: from 1.0.0 to 1.8.0.
-
CVE-2026-96377 4.3 Moyenne
Drupal Combined image style
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Drupal Combined image style allows Excessive Allocation. This issue affects Combined image style versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.0.7.
-
CVE-2026-96376 – Non évaluée
Drupal Cloud
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ("OS Command Injection") vulnerability in Drupal Cloud allows OS Command Injection. This issue affects Cloud versions: from 0.0.0 to 7.0.1.
-
CVE-2026-96375 – Non évaluée
Drupal Cloud
Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Drupal Cloud allows Adversary in the Middle (AiTM). This issue affects Cloud versions: from 0.0.0 to 7.0.1.
-
CVE-2026-96374 – Non évaluée
Drupal Project Browser
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Project Browser allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Project Browser versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.3, from 2.1.0 to 2.1.5.
-
CVE-2026-96373 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96372 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Insufficient Granularity of Access Control vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96371 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Privilege Defined With Unsafe Actions vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96370 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96369 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Use of Web Browser Cache Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96368 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96367 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Privilege Defined With Unsafe Actions vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96366 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96365 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Excessive Allocation. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96364 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Improper Control of Interaction Frequency vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Functionality Misuse. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96363 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Privilege Defined With Unsafe Actions vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96362 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96361 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96360 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96359 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96358 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96357 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96356 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-96355 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Code Injection. This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
-
CVE-2026-87955 – Non évaluée
Drupal Ultimate Table Field
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Ultimate Table Field allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Ultimate Table Field versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.1.1, from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1.
-
CVE-2026-87954 – Non évaluée
Drupal Taxonomy Term Glossary
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Taxonomy Term Glossary allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Taxonomy Term Glossary versions: from 0.0.0 to 4.6.0.
-
CVE-2026-87953 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87952 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Remote Services with Stolen Credentials. This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87951 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87950 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87949 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87948 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87947 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Signature Spoof. This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87946 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
Observable Timing Discrepancy vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Brute Force. This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87945 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Fake the Source of Data. This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87944 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Adversary in the Middle (AiTM). This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87943 – Non évaluée
Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-87942 – Non évaluée
Drupal SafeDelete
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal SafeDelete allows Stored XSS. This issue affects SafeDelete versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.0.88.
-
CVE-2026-87941 – Non évaluée
Drupal Patreon
Vulnerability in Drupal Patreon. This issue affects Patreon versions: 7.x.
-
CVE-2026-87940 – Non évaluée
Drupal Key auth
Use of Web Browser Cache Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in Drupal Key auth allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Key auth versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.2.4.
-
CVE-2026-87939 – Non évaluée
Drupal Feed Block
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Feed Block allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Feed Block versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.2, from 3.0.0 to 3.0.2.
-
CVE-2026-87938 – Non évaluée
Drupal CSP log
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Drupal CSP log allows SQL Injection. This issue affects CSP log versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.0.2.
-
CVE-2026-87937 – Non évaluée
Drupal Central Authentication System (CAS) Server
URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in Drupal Central Authentication System (CAS) Server allows Fake the Source of Data. This issue affects Central Authentication System (CAS) Server versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.4, from 2.1.0 to 2.1.3.
-
CVE-2026-87936 – Non évaluée
Drupal amazee.ai Private AI Provider
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Drupal amazee.ai Private AI Provider allows SQL Injection. This issue affects amazee.ai Private AI Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.3.7, from 1.4.0 to 1.4.3.
-
CVE-2026-84924 – Non évaluée
Drupal Email Verification / SMS Verification / OTP Verification
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Email Verification / SMS Verification / OTP Verification allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects Email Verification / SMS Verification / OTP Verification versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.4.0.
-
CVE-2026-84923 – Non évaluée
Drupal Email Verification / SMS Verification / OTP Verification
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Drupal Email Verification / SMS Verification / OTP Verification allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects Email Verification / SMS Verification / OTP Verification versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.4.0.
-
CVE-2026-84921 – Non évaluée
Drupal Webform Submissions Delete
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Webform Submissions Delete allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Webform Submissions Delete versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.2.0.
-
CVE-2026-84920 – Non évaluée
Drupal Unpublished Node Permissions
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Unpublished Node Permissions allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Unpublished Node Permissions versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.8.0.
-
CVE-2026-84919 – Non évaluée
Drupal PhotoSwipe - Responsive JavaScript Modal Image Gallery
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal PhotoSwipe - Responsive JavaScript Modal Image Gallery allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PhotoSwipe - Responsive JavaScript Modal Image Gallery versions: from 0.0.0 to 5.0.9.
-
CVE-2026-84918 – Non évaluée
Drupal Monobank payment API
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Drupal Monobank payment API allows Signature Spoof. This issue affects Monobank payment API versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.0.3.
-
CVE-2026-84917 – Non évaluée
Drupal Jsonapi Role Access
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Jsonapi Role Access allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Jsonapi Role Access versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.2.
-
CVE-2026-84916 – Non évaluée
Drupal Islandora
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Islandora allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Islandora versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.19.0.
-
CVE-2026-84915 – Non évaluée
Drupal Component blocks
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Component blocks allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Component blocks versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.2.7.
-
CVE-2026-84914 – Non évaluée
Drupal Calculate Working Days
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Calculate Working Days allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Calculate Working Days versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.3.
-
CVE-2026-84913 4.6 Moyenne
Drupal AI Translate
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal AI Translate allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects AI Translate versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.3.2, from 1.4.0 to 1.4.1.
-
CVE-2026-84912 4.6 Moyenne
Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence)
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects AI (Artificial Intelligence) versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.3.13, from 1.4.0 to 1.4.8.
-
CVE-2026-84911 3.1 Faible
Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence)
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) allows Stored XSS. This issue affects AI (Artificial Intelligence) versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.3.13, from 1.4.0 to 1.4.8.
-
CVE-2026-84910 4.2 Moyenne
Drupal Advanced Search
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Advanced Search allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Advanced Search versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.4.5.
-
CVE-2026-81163 – Non évaluée
Drupal Media Library Importer
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Drupal Media Library Importer allows Path Traversal. This issue affects Media Library Importer versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.1.6.
-
CVE-2026-16648 – Non évaluée
Drupal Mailer Plus Log
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Drupal Mailer Plus Log allows Remote Services with Stolen Credentials. This issue affects Mailer Plus Log versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.2.7.
-
CVE-2026-114728 5.3 Moyenne
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a remote content blocking bypass in the handling of FuncIRI attributes. rcube_washtml detected the CSS url() token with a pattern that enumerated only some of its escaped spellings, so values using other CSS escape sequences, for example \000075rl( or u\72 l(, were not recognized and remote content was loaded from an HTML message without the user's consent. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix remote content blocking bypass via CSS escapes in FuncIRI attributes (again)”, which resolves CSS escapes before matching and also inspects the `to`, `from` and `by` attributes.
-
CVE-2026-114727 8.3 Élevée
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 passes potentially unsafe content into ImageMagick when resizing images. SVG and EPS were accepted as valid image types for contact photo upload and conversion, and both formats can reference external resources and invoke ImageMagick delegates when processed. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix passing potentally unsafe attachment content into ImageMagick on image resize”, which removes svg and eps from the accepted types.
-
CVE-2026-114726 5.8 Moyenne
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a mail header injection vulnerability in the Bounce (resend) action. rcube_mime::decode_address_list() did not strip control characters from the decoded display name, so a received message whose From display-name carries CRLF sequences in an encoded word could inject arbitrary headers into the message emitted when the user bounces it. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix mail header injection via the From display-name in the Bounce (resend) action”.
-
CVE-2026-114725 5.0 Moyenne
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a mail header injection vulnerability. rcmail_sendmail stripped newline characters only from the Subject and Organization headers, leaving other header values taken from request parameters unsanitized, so a remote authenticated attacker could inject arbitrary headers into an outgoing message via the References, In-Reply-To, Message-ID and From parameters. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix mail header injection via References/In-Reply-To/Message-ID/From parameters”, which normalizes whitespace in every string header value.
-
CVE-2026-114724 7.4 Élevée
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 contains an object injection primitive in rcube_session::unserialize(). A session key prefixed with “!” was treated as having no value, and the reconstructed serialized string was emitted with a key but no corresponding value, desynchronizing the remainder of the input so that following session data was interpreted as a serialized value. This yields a PHP object injection primitive for an attacker able to influence stored session data. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix object injection primitive in rcube_session::unserialize() via “!”-prefixed session keys”, which rejects such keys.
-
CVE-2026-114723 3.7 Faible
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 allows the ImageMagick resource limits to be bypassed during thumbnail generation. When rcube_image falls back to GD, the available-memory check was applied only on Windows, so on other platforms a crafted image with large dimensions was processed by GD without any resource limit and could exhaust server memory. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix ImageMagick resource limits bypass by GD fallback during thumbnail generation”, which applies the memory check on all platforms.
-
CVE-2026-114722 6.5 Moyenne
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a CSS scoping bypass in HTML messages. rcube_utils::mod_css_styles() did not treat an at-rule prologue such as @layer a; as a selector boundary, and did not handle selectors beginning with ::, so selectors following an at-rule were left unscoped and applied to the whole Roundcube interface instead of being confined to the message body. This allows an HTML message to restyle application chrome for UI redressing and spoofing. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix CSS scoping bypass in HTML messages using at-rules”.
-
CVE-2026-114721 3.1 Faible
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 allows the disabled_actions configuration setting to be bypassed. The check compared only the action name as requested, so a remote authenticated attacker could reach an action listed in disabled_actions by requesting it through its deprecated alias instead. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix bug where deprecated action aliases bypassed `disabled_actions` setting”, which moves the check into rcmail::action_handler() and resolves aliases before comparing.
-
CVE-2026-114720 7.1 Élevée
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by an IMAP command injection vulnerability. A remote authenticated attacker can exploit this via CRLF sequences injected into the _flag parameter of the mail/mark action to execute arbitrary IMAP commands. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix IMAP command injection via CRLF in `_flag` parameter of mail/mark action”, which rejects flags containing control, whitespace and IMAP-special characters.
-
CVE-2026-114719 3.7 Faible
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action of the markasjunk plugin. The plugin read the _uid parameter from POST data but passed it to rcmail::get_uids() without constraining the input mode, so values re-read inside that helper could be taken from the query string and the action carried out without a valid CSRF token. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action”, which passes rcube_utils::INPUT_POST explicitly.
-
CVE-2026-114718 4.7 Moyenne
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the password plugin. Error text returned by a password driver was concatenated into the message presented to the user without HTML escaping, so a backend able to influence that text, such as the DirectAdmin API, could inject script into the Roundcube interface. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix XSS issue in handling of password driver error responses”, which escapes the driver message before display.
-
CVE-2026-114717 4.0 Moyenne
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a mail header injection vulnerability when a message is forwarded as an attachment. The subject of the forwarded message was used verbatim to generate the attachment name, so a received message whose subject contains CRLF sequences could inject arbitrary MIME part headers into the outgoing message. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix mail header injection via subject of a message forwarded as attachment”, which collapses whitespace in the generated name.
-
CVE-2026-114716 8.5 Élevée
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a mail header injection vulnerability. rcmail_sendmail::extract_inline_images() used the media type taken from an inline image data URI without validating it, so a remote authenticated attacker could inject arbitrary MIME part headers into the outgoing message by placing CRLF sequences in that media type. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix mail header injection via media type in an inline image data URI”, which validates the media type with rcube_mime::is_mimetype_valid().
-
CVE-2026-114715 6.8 Moyenne
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the Modoboa driver of the password plugin. The driver took the first entry of the account search result returned by the Modoboa API instead of matching the authenticated user, so a password change could be applied to a different account. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix bug where Password Modoboa driver could change password for another account”, which selects the account whose username matches and fails if none does.
-
CVE-2026-114664 7.1 Élevée
frappe
Frappe Framework before 16.33.0 contains a blind SQL injection vulnerability in the frappe.desk.doctype.event.event.get_events method, which fails to properly neutralize user-supplied input before including it in SQL queries. Authenticated attackers can send crafted input to get_events and infer query results from application behavior to extract sensitive database information.
-
CVE-2026-114663 8.4 Élevée
vyperlang vyper
Vyper 0.4.0b1 through 0.5.0b1 miscompiles unfoldable constants and omitted default arguments from imported modules, because parse_Name resolves their names in the using function's scope rather than at declaration. When a contract's parameter, local, or loop variable shares such a name, attacker-influenced input can replace the intended value, including out-of-range values for narrow types such as uint8, corrupting validation or accounting logic.
-
CVE-2026-114662 8.1 Élevée
obot-platform obot
Obot before 0.26.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the CLI login flow that allows unauthenticated attackers to steal API keys by choosing token request IDs. Attackers can create a token request via POST /api/token-request, send the login link to a signed-in user, and fetch the resulting non-expiring API key to take over the victim's account.
-
CVE-2026-114661 8.5 Élevée
openremote
OpenRemote 1.2.0 before 1.31.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in GatewayServiceResource that allows any authenticated user to start, stop and query gateway tunnels without an administrative role. Attackers can send POST or DELETE requests to the gateway tunnel endpoint to open persistent bidirectional TCP circuits into an edge gateway's network or tear down operator tunnels.
-
CVE-2026-114660 6.3 Moyenne
getgrav grav
Grav from 2.0.0 before 2.2.5 contains an improper access control vulnerability in FlexDirectory::dynamicFlexField() that allows page authors to call arbitrary Flex object methods via flex-*@ directives in page frontmatter. When a user with page edit rights opens the page, directives calling setStorageKey() and delete() run in their session, deleting protected pages neither account may delete.
-
CVE-2026-114659 6.5 Moyenne
getgrav grav-plugin-flex-objects
Grav Flex Objects plugin 1.4.0 before 1.4.17 contains an authorization bypass because its generic /api/v1/flex-objects/pages API routes check only directory-level admin.pages permissions, without enforcing the Pages API's api.pages.read/write permissions or page-level permissions rules. Authenticated non-super users with api.access and admin.pages or admin.configuration.pages permissions can read page source and frontmatter, modify content, or delete pages they are denied.
-
CVE-2026-114658 8.8 Élevée
getgrav grav-plugin-login
Grav Login plugin from 3.6.0 before 3.9.13 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the login.invite task that allows page authors to obtain super user accounts. Attackers can define an invitation form granting super access in page frontmatter, submit it unauthenticated, and register the invited address for full site control.
-
CVE-2026-114657 5.7 Moyenne
getgrav grav
Grav from 2.0.0 before 2.2.5 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows page authors to capture visitors' HTTP Basic credentials through Twig page content. Authors can print the request Uri object, which embeds PHP_AUTH_USER and PHP_AUTH_PW, inside an inline style background image to exfiltrate administrators' credentials to an external host.
-
CVE-2026-114656 7.5 Élevée
traefik
Traefik before 2.11.58 and 3.7.13 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated clients to skip client-certificate checks because negated Host matchers are counted as served domains. Attackers can reach backends protected by RequireAndVerifyClientCert when a router rule with !Host() creates a TLS options conflict that falls back to the default options.
-
CVE-2026-114642 8.7 Élevée
traefik
Traefik 2.11.0 before 2.11.58 and 3.0.0 before 3.7.14 stores its NTLM/Kerberos backend round tripper in a client-connection slot not keyed by ServersTransport, so one service's TLS client configuration is reused for another service's backend. An unauthenticated client can arm the slot via a backend issuing an NTLM or Negotiate challenge, then reach another service on the same keep-alive connection, bypassing its root CAs, server name, and certificate verification.
-
CVE-2026-114641 3.7 Faible
traefik
Traefik 2.11.x before 2.11.58 and 3.x before 3.7.14 contains a race condition in NTLM and Kerberos (Negotiate) backend authentication, where the per-connection sticky round tripper slot is read and written without synchronization. Remote attackers can send concurrent HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 requests over one connection to orphan backend connections, break connection-bound authentication, or crash Traefik.
-
CVE-2026-114640 8.7 Élevée
traefik
Traefik from v3.7.0 before v3.7.14 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in its Kubernetes Ingress-NGINX provider that forwards client-supplied Ssl-Client-* headers on the plaintext HTTP router. When ssl-redirect is disabled alongside auth-tls-pass-certificate-to-upstream, unauthenticated attackers can send Ssl-Client-Verify: SUCCESS with a chosen certificate subject and issuer to impersonate mTLS identities.
-
CVE-2026-114639 8.7 Élevée
traefik
Traefik 2.11.0 before 2.11.58 and 3.0.0 before 3.7.14 contains an authentication bypass because a first request preauthenticated with an Authorization: Negotiate token authenticates a socket in the globally shared backend connection pool, which is never isolated. Unauthenticated attackers on separate frontend connections can be assigned that NTLM/Kerberos-bound socket and perform reads or writes with the victim's identity.
-
CVE-2026-114638 8.7 Élevée
traefik
Traefik v3.7.0 before v3.7.14 contains an improper authentication vulnerability in the Kubernetes Ingress NGINX provider that merges client CAs when auth-tls-secret names collide after dot-to-dash normalization. Attackers holding certificates from another host's CA can access a host requiring its own client CA, while that host's legitimate clients are refused.
-
CVE-2026-114637 8.7 Élevée
traefik
Traefik from v3.2.0 before v3.7.14 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the experimental FastProxy connection pool, which fails to pin NTLM/Negotiate-authenticated backend connections to their frontend connection. Unauthenticated clients can be handed a pooled keep-alive backend connection where a victim completed an NTLM or Negotiate handshake, letting them read victim data and act as that victim.
-
CVE-2026-114636 8.7 Élevée
traefik
Traefik v3.7.13 before v3.7.14 contains an access-control bypass in the Kubernetes Ingress NGINX provider, where the HTTP router generated for ssl-passthrough Ingresses on non-TLS entry points never applies the Ingress's access-control annotations. Unauthenticated attackers reaching the HTTP entry point with the Ingress host can access backends protected by auth-type, auth-url, or whitelist-source-range annotations, with nothing logged.
-
CVE-2026-114635 8.7 Élevée
traefik
Traefik before v2.11.58 and v3.7.14 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in its SNI check, which is skipped when request TLS state is nil. Unauthenticated clients can send HTTP/2 requests with the :scheme http pseudo-header over TLS on Go 1.27 builds to reach routers requiring client certificates without presenting one.
-
CVE-2026-114634 4.3 Moyenne
WWBN AVideo
WWBN AVideo before 29.4.0 contains a blind server-side request forgery vulnerability in getHeaderContentTypeFromURL() because get_headers() follows redirects without re-validating targets with isSSRFSafeURL(). Authenticated uploaders can store a videoLink pointing to a redirector, causing internal GET requests when visitors view the video, enabling internal port scanning via the embed-versus-video render oracle.
-
CVE-2026-114633 6.5 Moyenne
WWBN AVideo
WWBN AVideo before 29.4.0 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that allows delegated Users Admin accounts to delete or modify administrator accounts. Attackers can submit requests to confirmDeleteUser.json.php or userAddNew.json.php targeting administrators to delete their videos and accounts, or change and demote them.
-
CVE-2026-114577 7.3 Élevée
oretnom23 php-travel-agency-system
A vulnerability was found in oretnom23 php-travel-agency-system. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file admin/insert.php of the component Insertion Handler. The manipulation of the argument costomer_id/payment_type/amount/description/user/uploadimage/full_name/visa_no results in sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
-
CVE-2026-114576 3.7 Faible
Linksys RE6250
A vulnerability has been found in Linksys RE6250 1.0.04.001. This affects the function strcmp of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation of the argument session_id leads to insufficiently random values. The attack may be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
-
CVE-2026-16255 5.9 Moyenne
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 12.0 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, when the instance-wide SAML or LDAP membership lock was enabled, an authenticated user could have granted or accepted project and group membership outside the identity provider's control, due to incomplete enforcement of the membership lock on requests created before the lock was enabled.
-
CVE-2026-15723 8.2 Élevée
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 10.1 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, when OmniAuth SAML and LDAP auto-linking were both enabled, an authenticated user could have taken over an existing LDAP-backed account without any interaction from the targeted user, due to improper input sanitization in the LDAP email lookup path used during OmniAuth identity linking.
-
CVE-2026-14288 3.1 Faible
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 17.4 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated to bypass a required merge request approval policy on a protected branch due to improper access control during approval rule synchronization.
-
CVE-2026-13319 4.3 Moyenne
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.10 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, could have allowed an authenticated to read milestone metadata, including titles, descriptions, and full project paths, from arbitrary private projects across the instance without any project membership, due to missing authorization checks on a user-supplied project filter parameter in the group milestones API.
-
CVE-2026-12664 6.8 Moyenne
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.2 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user with a read_api-scoped token to retrieve a project's incoming email address and create work items, bypassing the token's restrictions, due to insufficient scope enforcement on a GraphQL field.
-
CVE-2026-114714 5.3 Moyenne
Roundcube Webmail
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a path traversal vulnerability in the squirrelmail_usercopy plugin. With the file based backend, the source path was built from the login name without rejecting path separators, so a login name containing a slash could cause files outside the configured squirrelmail_data_dir to be read and imported. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix unsafe use of a login name in SquirrelMail import file path”, which rejects login names containing a slash.
-
CVE-2026-114575 10.0 Critique
TOTOLINK A950RG
A flaw has been found in TOTOLINK A950RG 4.1.2cu.5268_B20221104. Affected by this issue is the function UploadCustomModule of the file lib/cste_modules/product.so. Executing a manipulation of the argument FileMd5 can lead to command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
-
CVE-2026-114574 4.3 Moyenne
massCodeIO massCode
A security vulnerability has been detected in massCodeIO massCode 5.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file src/main/api/index.ts of the component Local HTTP Service. Such manipulation leads to information disclosure. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The name of the patch is d25d8fa3f5a1e34285c8634f18729650c0c05cda. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.
-
CVE-2026-112378 4.3 Moyenne
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 17.8 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to access paid AI features without a valid subscription due to insufficient server-side validation in billing eligibility checks.
-
CVE-2026-112326 3.1 Faible
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 17.8 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user with read-only permissions to permanently delete existing vulnerability records due to improper cleanup logic that failed to distinguish between pre-existing records from newly created ones during error handling.
-
CVE-2026-112212 7.5 Élevée
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.3 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, under certain conditions, an unauthenticated user could have poisoned a shared cache's OAuth/OIDC discovery document to redirect certain flows to an externally controlled server, due to improper trust of user-supplied values when constructing endpoint URLs in cached discovery responses.
-
CVE-2026-110264 10.0 Critique
GitLab
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 7.0 before 18.11.13, 19.0 before 19.0.10, 19.1 before 19.1.9, 19.2 before 19.2.9, 19.3 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the GitLab server due to integer overflow when compiling a specially crafted regular expression.
-
CVE-2026-105777 4.3 Moyenne
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.6.5 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, under certain conditions, an unauthenticated user could have retrieved sensitive internal server credentials due to improper filtering of internal response headers.
-
CVE-2026-105711 3.5 Faible
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.0 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, when a merge request in a public project referenced a confidential issue from a private project, an authenticated user with no project membership could have read the confidential issue's title, due to a viewer-independent fragment cache key that incorrectly shared per-user-redacted rendered content across all users.
-
CVE-2026-103515 2.7 Faible
GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 19.2 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, when an instance administrator locked a group's Duo availability, an authenticated user with group Owner permissions could have re-enabled AI-backed data egress to a third-party service for that group and its descendant projects, due to insufficient granularity of the admin-lock enforcement controls.
-
CVE-2026-89052 5.9 Moyenne
TP-Link Systems Inc. Archer C6 V2
A hardcoded cryptographic key management vulnerability exists in Archer C6 due to the use of a universal cryptographic key shared across devices. An attacker who obtains an encrypted configuration file or other protected credential data can recover plaintext credentials. Successful exploitation may allow unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information, including administrative credentials.
-
CVE-2026-76531 9.9 Critique
Splunk SOAR
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76531 are related to files or directories accessible to external parties and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-552.
-
CVE-2026-76530 8.8 Élevée
Splunk SOAR
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76530 are related to use of non-canonical URL paths for authorization decisions and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-647.
-
CVE-2026-76529 – Non évaluée
Splunk SOAR
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76529 are related to improper protection of alternate path and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-424.
-
CVE-2026-76528 – Non évaluée
Splunk SOAR
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76528 are related to protection mechanism failure and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-693.
-
CVE-2026-76527 – Non évaluée
Splunk SOAR
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76527 are related to improper check or handling of exceptional conditions and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-703.
-
CVE-2026-76526 – Non évaluée
Splunk SOAR
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76526 are related to improper neutralization and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-707.
-
CVE-2026-76408 – Non évaluée
Splunk SOAR
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76408 are related to improper control of a resource through its lifetime and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-664.
-
CVE-2026-76407 – Non évaluée
Splunk SOAR
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76407 are related to improper access control and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-284.
-
CVE-2026-76406 5.9 Moyenne
Splunk SOAR
In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.7.0, an unauthenticated user with access to encrypted credential data from an affected Splunk SOAR instance could submit Basic authentication data to the Representational State Transfer (REST) API to expose and decrypt that encrypted credential data. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk SOAR decrypts encrypted Basic authentication values before completing authentication checks. The attack requires the unauthenticated user to have encrypted credential data from an affected Splunk SOAR instance. The unauthenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. For more information see Using the REST API reference for Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/rest-api-reference/8.5.0/using-the-splunk-soar-rest-api/using-the-rest-api-reference-for-splunk-soar-on-premises) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76308 6.5 Moyenne
Splunk SOAR
In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.7.0, an authenticated user could change the Enterprise Security edition through the Representational State Transfer (REST) API and cause Splunk SOAR to apply the license change. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk SOAR authenticates requests to manage the Enterprise Security edition but does not authorize the caller before it applies the license change. For more information see Using the REST API reference for Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/rest-api-reference/8.7.0/using-the-splunk-soar-rest-api/using-the-rest-api-reference-for-splunk-soar-on-premises), Obtain and configure a Splunk SOAR (On-premises) license (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/8.7.0/configure-your-companys-settings-in-splunk-soar-on-premises/obtain-and-configure-a-splunk-soar-on-premises-license), and Integration of Splunk SOAR with Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/administer/8.7/automation-with-playbooks/integration-of-splunk-soar-with-splunk-enterprise-security) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76307 7.2 Élevée
Splunk SOAR
In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.7.0, a user that holds a role with the Users and Roles view permission could use the Representational State Transfer (REST) API to infer authentication token values for other users. If the inferred token grants administrative access, that user could gain administrative access to the Splunk SOAR instance. The vulnerability is possible because the REST API accepts caller-controlled query filters on sensitive user record fields. For more information see Using the REST API reference for Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/rest-api-reference/7.1.0/using-the-splunk-soar-rest-api/using-the-rest-api-reference-for-splunk-soar-on-premises), Query for Data (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/rest-api-reference/7.1.0/using-the-splunk-soar-rest-api/query-for-data), and Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/6.4.0/manage-your-splunk-soar-on-premises-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-on-premises) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76306 7.5 Élevée
Splunk SOAR
In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.7.0, a user that has the "Observer" role could use query filters in the Representational State Transfer (REST) API to infer password hashes and authorization tokens for other users. The information disclosure is possible because Splunk SOAR applies REST API query filters to user records before it protects sensitive fields from query processing. For more information see Using the REST API reference for Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/rest-api-reference/8.5.0/using-the-splunk-soar-rest-api/using-the-rest-api-reference-for-splunk-soar-on-premises), Query for Data (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/rest-api-reference/7.1.0/using-the-splunk-soar-rest-api/query-for-data), and Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/8.5.0/manage-your-splunk-soar-on-premises-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-on-premises) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76305 6.5 Moyenne
Splunk SOAR
In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.7.0, an authenticated user who does not hold a role with permission to view apps could download an archive of an installed app. This could expose all data in the app archive, including proprietary source code and sensitive information. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk SOAR does not verify permission to view apps before it returns the app archive. For more information see Export or import an app (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/develop-apps/8.4.0/develop-an-app-using-the-splunk-soar-app-wizard/export-or-import-an-app) and Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/8.5.0/manage-your-splunk-soar-on-premises-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-on-premises) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76304 4.3 Moyenne
Splunk SOAR
In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.7.0, an authenticated user who does not hold a role with permission to edit Automation Brokers could download the Splunk SOAR Automation Broker Docker Compose configuration file. The file contains the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) of the Splunk SOAR instance, the container image location, and the Splunk SOAR Automation Broker version. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk SOAR returns the configuration file without enforcing the Automation Broker edit permission. For more information see Install Splunk Automation Broker on a Docker host (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/splunk-automation-broker/install-and-create-classic-splunk-soar-automation-brokers/install-splunk-automation-broker-on-a-docker-host) and Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/8.5.0/manage-your-splunk-soar-on-premises-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-on-premises) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76303 5.7 Moyenne
Splunk SOAR
In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.7.0, a user that holds a role with the install_apps capability could store attacker-controlled content that Splunk SOAR displays in app documentation by installing an app. If another user who holds a role with permission to view apps opens the app documentation, Splunk SOAR could run that content in the browser of the user who opened the app documentation. With this access, the first user could access data and make changes that the user who opened the app documentation could make. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk SOAR does not sanitize app documentation content before it displays that content. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The user that holds a role with the install_apps capability should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. For more information see Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/7.1.0/manage-your-splunk-soar-on-premises-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-on-premises) and Add and configure apps and assets to provide actions in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/manage-your-splunk-soar-on-premises-apps-and-assets/add-and-configure-apps-and-assets-to-provide-actions-in-splunk-soar-on-premises) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76302 9.9 Critique
Splunk Enterprise
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76302 are related to improper neutralization and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-707.
-
CVE-2026-76301 – Non évaluée
Splunk Enterprise
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76301 are related to protection mechanism failure and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-693.
-
CVE-2026-76300 – Non évaluée
Splunk Enterprise
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76300 are related to improper control of a resource through its lifetime and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-664.
-
CVE-2026-76299 9.9 Critique
Splunk Enterprise
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76299 are related to improper access control and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-284.
-
CVE-2026-76298 8.8 Élevée
Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4 and 10.2.8, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could derive the PostgreSQL sidecar database superuser password and run arbitrary operating system commands as the user account running Splunk Enterprise on search head cluster members. The vulnerability is possible because the PostgreSQL sidecar service derives a privileged database password from the search head cluster identifier that appears in search job logs. For more information see About configuring role-based user access (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/about-configuring-role-based-user-access), server.conf (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/admin-manual/10.2/configuration-file-reference/10.2.0-configuration-file-reference/server.conf), and Sidecar configuration settings (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/admin-manual/10.4/splunk-sidecars/sidecar-configuration-settings) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76297 4.2 Moyenne
Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, an unauthenticated user could trick a user that holds a role with the edit_federated_providers capability into turning off all federated search providers. Successful exploitation could temporarily prevent federated searches from retrieving data from remote datasets. The vulnerability is possible because the federated provider Representational State Transfer (REST) API accepts GET requests for actions that change provider state. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The unauthenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. For more information see Run federated searches over remote Splunk platform deployments (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/federated-search/10.6/run-federated-searches-across-other-splunk-deployments/run-federated-searches-over-remote-splunk-platform-deployments) and Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.4/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76296 4.3 Moyenne
Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could create, move, edit, or delete sourcetype renaming configurations that they own in apps that they do not have permission to access. The vulnerability is possible when Splunk Web is turned on because Splunk Web does not verify the required app permissions before it performs sourcetype renaming operations. For more information see Rename source types at search time (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/get-started/get-data-in/10.6/configure-source-types/rename-source-types-at-search-time) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76295 4.3 Moyenne
Splunk Enterprise · Splunk Secure Gateway
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, and Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.12, 3.9.26, and 3.8.73, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could view dashboard and report listings beyond the requested filter scope while remaining within objects that the user can access. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Secure Gateway does not neutralize special characters in values before it creates filters for dashboard and report requests. For more information see About configuring role-based user access (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/about-configuring-role-based-user-access) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76294 4.3 Moyenne
Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could move field extractions or field transformations to apps for which the user does not have read access. The vulnerability is possible because the Representational State Transfer (REST) API does not validate destination app access before it processes field extraction and field transformation move operations. For more information see Use the Field extractions page (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/manage-knowledge-objects/knowledge-management-manual/10.6/use-the-settings-pages-for-field-extractions-in-splunk-web/use-the-field-extractions-page) and Manage knowledge object permissions (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/manage-knowledge-objects/knowledge-management-manual/10.6/get-started-with-knowledge-objects/manage-knowledge-object-permissions) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76293 7.2 Élevée
Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.3, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, a user that holds a role with the edit_manager_xml capability could execute arbitrary operating-system commands using the permissions of the user account running Splunk Enterprise by opening the affected configuration in the Splunk Web Manager page. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Web evaluates user-controlled expressions from Manager XML without sufficiently restricting the expression syntax.
-
CVE-2026-76292 6.5 Moyenne
Splunk Enterprise · Splunk Secure Gateway
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, and Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.12, 3.9.26, and 3.8.73, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" Splunk role or the "sc_admin" Splunk Secure Gateway role could read mobile alert notification data for other users through Splunk Secure Gateway App Key Value Store (KV Store) Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoints. The vulnerability is possible because the affected Splunk Secure Gateway App Key Value Store collections do not enforce user-level authorization for read requests. For more information see About the app key value store (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/admin-manual/10.2/administer-the-app-key-value-store/about-the-app-key-value-store) and About configuring role-based user access (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/about-configuring-role-based-user-access) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76291 8.8 Élevée
Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, a user that holds a role with the schedule_search capability could bypass the expected safeguards in the scheduled search workflow. The user could then run risky Search Processing Language (SPL) commands that disclose or alter Splunk Enterprise data or disrupt Splunk Enterprise availability. The vulnerability is possible because the Splunk Enterprise search scheduler does not apply SPL safeguards for risky commands to scheduled searches. For more information see SPL safeguards for risky commands (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.6/best-practices-for-splunk-platform-security/spl-safeguards-for-risky-commands) in the Splunk documentation. For more information see authorize.conf (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/splunk-enterprise-admin-manual/10.6/configuration-file-reference/10.6.0-configuration-file-reference/authorize.conf) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76290 7.5 Élevée
Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, and 10.0.11, an unauthenticated user could send repeated requests to the Edge Processor package download endpoint in the Splunk Pipeline Builders app. The requests could cause the Splunk daemon to consume excessive system resources and potentially stop responding. The vulnerability is possible because the endpoint accepts package download requests without authentication and reads and base64-encodes the complete package in memory for each request. After upgrading, prepare all existing Edge Processor instances, turn on authentication for Edge Processor package downloads, and restart Splunk Enterprise. For more information, see Enable authentication for Edge Processor package downloads (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/process-data-at-the-edge/use-edge-processors-for-splunk-enterprise/10.4/administer-edge-processors/enable-authentication-for-edge-processor-package-downloads).
-
CVE-2026-76289 6.5 Moyenne
Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could make the Splunk Enterprise instance unavailable to other users by sending a request to the Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoint for lookup table files. The affected instance requires a restart to restore service. The vulnerability is possible because the endpoint does not limit resource use when it processes response field selections. For more information see Endpoints reference list (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/rest-api-reference/10.4/introduction/endpoints-reference-list) and About configuring role-based user access (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.4/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/about-configuring-role-based-user-access) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-76288 7.5 Élevée
Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, an unauthenticated user could send a single crafted request to the Splunk Web JavaScript logger endpoint and cause Splunk Web to stop responding to requests. Splunk Web remains unavailable until Splunk Enterprise is restarted. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Web does not limit request-header parsing before processing the request.
-
CVE-2026-76287 5.4 Moyenne
Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, a user that holds a role with the preview_data_management_pipeline capability or edit_data_management_pipeline_job capability could read or delete Data Management SPL2 preview jobs and results outside their ownership scope. The vulnerability is possible because the Data Management Representational State Transfer (REST) API verifies the required capability but does not verify that the requested preview job belongs to the requester. The affected Data Management REST API is available only when the Edge Processor feature is turned on. The Edge Processor feature is turned off by default. For more information see Set up a data management control plane (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/process-data-at-the-edge/use-edge-processors-for-splunk-enterprise/10.4/getting-started/set-up-a-data-management-control-plane) and Getting sample data for previewing data transformations (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/process-data-at-the-edge/use-edge-processors-for-splunk-enterprise/10.4/working-with-pipelines/getting-sample-data-for-previewing-data-transformations) in the Splunk documentation.
-
CVE-2026-114441 7.3 Élevée
oretnom23 php-travel-agency-system
A weakness has been identified in oretnom23 php-travel-agency-system. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file admin/update.php. This manipulation of the argument action/full_name/visa_no/hiden/title/description/page_id/user causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. This product uses a rolling release model to deliver continuous updates. As a result, specific version information for affected or updated releases is not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
-
CVE-2026-114440 7.3 Élevée
oretnom23 php-travel-agency-system
A vulnerability was identified in oretnom23 php-travel-agency-system. This affects an unknown part of the file admin/delete.php. The manipulation of the argument costomer_id/ticket_id/payment_id/id/document_id/salary_id/emp_id/user_id leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
-
CVE-2026-114439 7.3 Élevée
oretnom23 php-travel-agency-system
A vulnerability was determined in oretnom23 php-travel-agency-system. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/session.php of the component Session Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument user_id can lead to missing authentication. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
-
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
-
CVE-2026-103090 8.8 Élevée
Google SAM
Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CWE-306) and Insufficiently Protected Credentials (CWE-522) in the control plane enrollment status handler (HandleEnrollStatus at GET /enroll/status in internal/controlplane/server.go) in Google OSS Agent Mesh (SAM) versions 0.1.0-alpha.1 through 0.1.0-alpha.8 allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to retrieve an approved bootstrap-enrolled peer's signed Biscuit identity token by supplying a peer_id obtainable from the unauthenticated GET /info endpoint. A related flaw in POST /enroll allowed any bootstrap-token holder to re-fetch another peer's credential. An attacker can replay the disclosed Biscuit token as a bearer credential on /policies to read mesh authorization policies and on /routers/lease to overwrite advertised router multiaddrs. Users should upgrade to version 0.1.0-alpha.9 or later, which requires cryptographic proof of possession of the enrollment private key on credential-releasing endpoints, enforces rate limiting, and validates router lease addresses.
-
CVE-2026-100420 6.8 Moyenne
TP-Link Systems Inc. Deco BE63 V2.0
A sensitive information disclosure vulnerability in the cloud-client daemon of Deco BE63 allows authenticated attackers to retrieve the plaintext TP-Link ID account password. Successful exploitation may allow attackers to compromise the associated cloud account and perform unauthorized actions on behalf of the affected user.
-
CVE-2026-94423 – Non évaluée
Net::LibSSH versions before 0.004 for Perl authenticate to an unverified server because connect never checks the host key against known_hosts. connect reports success as soon as ssh_connect returns SSH_OK. libssh leaves the known-hosts check to the application, and this binding never makes it, so the strict_hostkeycheck and knownhosts options are set on the session and then decide nothing. Password, agent and public-key authentication, channel and SFTP operations all run on a session whose peer was never identified, so an attacker who can redirect the connection receives the password when password authentication is used, and commands and data sent over the session.
-
CVE-2026-94140 – Non évaluée
Rex versions through 1.16.1 for Perl accept an unknown SSH host key for remote rsync transfers because sync hardcodes StrictHostKeyChecking=no. Every remote branch of sync builds its ssh command with that option, for password authentication, for private-key authentication and for the fallback. The ssh options a caller sets through set_openssh_opt reach the OpenSSH transport but not this command, so there is no configuration that restores host key checking for the transfer. An attacker who can redirect the connection before the real host key is known presents their own and the transfer proceeds: under password authentication sync sends the connection password to that server, an upload writes the selected local files to it, and a download writes what it returns to the local destination.