Veille CVE

Lundi 19 octobre 2026

10 CVE

Critique 0 Élevée 4 Moyenne 5 Faible 0 Non évaluée 1 Exploitées (KEV) Tri : plus récentes « git » ✕
  1. CVE-2026-112254 4.3 Moyenne

    agit8or1 clientst0r

    A vulnerability was found in agit8or1 clientst0r up to 3.17.586. Affected by this vulnerability is the function _fetch_html of the file locations/services/property_url_importer.py of the component Property URL Importer. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 3.17.587 addresses this issue. The patch is identified as 7e75c6cc6a07621c10be9b07fafd99e89a02e327. The affected component should be upgraded. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.

  2. CVE-2026-110676 – Non évaluée

    Cpanel::JSON::XS versions before 4.80 for Perl allow memory exhaustion by encoding exponent notation as full decimal digits under allow_bignum. With allow_bignum, a JSON number with a fraction or exponent decodes to a Math::BigFloat, which stores the exponent separately and so decodes cheaply. Encoding it untyped or as JSON_TYPE_FLOAT writes the plain decimal form with one digit per unit of exponent. Nothing bounds the exponent, so the 12-byte text [1e30000000] encodes to 30 MB. Untrusted JSON decoded with allow_bignum and encoded again can exhaust memory and CPU.

  3. CVE-2026-80344 8.2 Élevée

    Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel

    Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel AS2 component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. In the AS2 protocol the sender of a message may request that the Message Disposition Notification be returned asynchronously to an address the sender supplies. camel-as2 took that address from the inbound message and used it as the destination for the outgoing receipt without constraining it to anything the deployment had configured. A remote partner therefore chose the host the Camel instance would connect to when delivering the MDN. That gives server-side request forgery from the position of the AS2 receiver, including reaching hosts that are only routable from inside the deployment's network, and where the outbound connection carries credentials configured for MDN delivery those credentials are presented to the attacker-chosen destination. Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. The asynchronous MDN destination is now constrained rather than taken verbatim from the inbound message. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, restrict outbound connectivity from the AS2 receiver to the partner endpoints it legitimately delivers receipts to, and do not attach credentials to MDN delivery that are valid for any host other than those partners.

  4. CVE-2026-111438 6.5 Moyenne

    openGauss-server

    在 openGauss-server 的 src/common/backend/libpq/hba.cpp 中，复制连接认证存在访问控制绕过。hba_getauthmethod() 在处理 HADR/SW 复制发送方时，不要求 is_node_internal_connection()，直接调用 check_hba_replication()。check_hba_replication() 仅按 replication 标记做弱匹配，缺少普通 check_hba() 中的远程 trust 禁止等完整校验。因此，非内部网络的 HADR/SW 复制连接可绕过内部连接限制和完整 pg_hba 策略完成认证，进而通过复制协议读取备份与日志数据。 此问题随 HADR 复制发送方绕过内部连接校验进入代码，自 3.0.0 起即存在。受影响版本包括 3.0.x、3.1.x、5.0.x、5.1.0、6.0.x，以及 7.0.0-RC1、7.0.0-RC2、7.0.0-RC3。该问题已在 7.0.0-LTS版本修复，通过要求 HADR/SW 复制发送方必须经过 is_node_internal_connection 校验，使外部复制连接改走普通 check_hba() 并触发禁止远程 trust 策略。修复pr见https://gitcode.com/opengauss/openGauss-server/pull/9757。

  5. CVE-2026-111439 4.3 Moyenne

    openGauss-server

    在 openGauss-server的 src/common/backend/utils/adt/genfile.cpp 模块中，内置函数 pg_read_binary_file_blocks() 存在权限校验逻辑缺陷。该函数在入口处仅校验了起始块号（startBlockNum）和块数量（blockCount）的范围，随后直接调用底层文件读取例程 ReadBinaryFileBlocksFirstCall()。该底层例程仅执行了路径规范化检查以及针对 .. 路径遍历和数据目录边界的基本检查，缺失了对调用者数据库权限（如 SELECT 权限）的校验。此外，辅助函数 is_row_data_file() 也仅用于识别文件形态，未包含权限检查。因此，任何拥有普通数据库连接权限的用户，只要能够通过 pg_relation_filepath() 等函数获取到目标表的底层关系文件路径（例如压缩数据的 _compress 文件路径），即可无需具备该表的 SELECT 权限，直接读取表数据的二进制块。 此漏洞影响此前3.0.0到6.0.0间的所有版本及补丁版，并在7.0.0-LTS版本修复。修复patch详见：https://gitcode.com/opengauss/openGauss-server/pull/9374。

  6. CVE-2026-106010 5.3 Moyenne

    Unknown BDM Digital Payment Gateway

    The BDM Digital Payment Gateway WordPress plugin through 1.3.12 does not verify the credentials on its public payment-status update route and treats unset credentials as valid, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary WooCommerce orders as paid without payment in the default configuration.

  7. CVE-2026-108121 6.9 Moyenne

    Koozali SME Server

    Brian Mariani from DigitalCanion SA has discovered a  vulnerability in the domain creation functionality of koozali's SME Server version 11.0rc1-215, allowing an attacker with high privileges to inject reserved Apache configuration directives, corrupting httpd.conf and preventing Apache from starting after a server reboot, resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition affecting the web server and its hosted virtual hosts.

  8. CVE-2026-108120 7.7 Élevée

    koozali SME Server

    Brian Mariani from DigitalCanion SA has discovered a path traversal vulnerability in the View Logs functionality of koozali's SME Server version 11.0rc1-215 allowing an unauthenticated attacker to access files outside of the intended directory, leading to exfiltration of files located outside the intended system logs directory, including potentially sensitive system and application files.

  9. CVE-2026-111440 7.0 Élevée

    openGauss-server openGauss-connector-jdbc

    在 openGauss-connector-jdbc 的 pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/log/LogFactory.java 中，LogFactory 根据 JDBC 连接参数中的 logger 类名调用 Class.forName 加载类后，直接反射调用以 String 为参数的构造函数，再转换为 Log。缺少 asSubclass(Log.class) 校验，非 Log 实现类也会在类型检查前被实例化。因此，当攻击者可控制 JDBC URL 或连接属性中的 logger 类名，且客户端 classpath 中存在可被加载的类时，可能在客户端触发非预期的类加载与构造副作用。 此漏洞自 JDBC 1.1.0引入，影响 1.1.0 及之后的 2.x、3.x、5.x、6.x 各版本及补丁（含 6.0.0 分支最新 6.0.6），以及 7.0.0-RC1、7.0.0-RC2、7.0.0-RC3，并在 7.0.0-LTS 版本修复。修复在 Class.forName 之后先执行 asSubclass(Log.class)，仅允许 Log 子类进入构造。修复pr见https://gitcode.com/opengauss/openGauss-connector-jdbc/pull/423。

  10. CVE-2026-111441 8.1 Élevée

    openGauss-server

    在 openGauss-server 的 src/gausskernel/cbb/utils/hll/hll.cpp 中，内置函数 HllObjectUnpack() 存在长度校验缺陷。该函数从用户提供的 packed HLL 解析 lenUsed 与 lenTotal 后，仅检查输入长度足以覆盖 HLL_HEAD_SIZE + lenUsed，随后按 lenTotal 分配缓冲区、按 lenUsed 调用 memcpy_s() 拷贝输入，既未校验 lenTotal >= lenUsed，也将 memcpy_s() 目标大小写成 lenUsed 而非实际分配的 lenTotal，导致安全拷贝无法拦截越界写。hll_in()、hll_print()、hll_cardinality() 等 SQL 入口会走同一解包路径。因此，普通数据库连接用户只需构造 lenTotal 小于 lenUsed 的畸形 packed HLL（例如经 ::hll 进入 hll_in()），即可触发服务端堆越界写，存在内存破坏风险。此问题随 packed HLL 解包函数 HllObjectUnpack() 进入代码，v2.1.0 起即存在。受影响版本包括 2.1.0、3.0.x、3.1.x、5.0.x、5.1.0、6.0.x，以及 7.0.0-RC1、7.0.0-RC2、7.0.0-RC3。该问题已在 7.0.0-LTS 版本修复，通过在 HllObjectUnpack() 中补齐 lenUsed <= lenTotal 校验，并将 memcpy_s() 的目标大小改为实际分配的 lenTotal。修复 PR 见 https://gitcode.com/opengauss/openGauss-server/pull/9380 。