Veille CVE

Semaine du 28 septembre au 4 octobre 2026

5 CVE

Critique 3 Élevée 2 Moyenne 0 Faible 0 Non évaluée 0 Exploitées (KEV) Tri : plus récentes « ISC BIND 9 » ✕
  1. CVE-2026-86345 9.0 Critique

    Red Hat Directory Server 11 · Red Hat Directory Server 12 · Red Hat Directory Server 13 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

    A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The server does not discard plaintext bytes already buffered from a client connection when negotiating StartTLS, allowing an on-path attacker to inject a crafted LDAP message that is processed after the TLS upgrade and whose response is delivered to the client in place of the client's own pending operation's response, due to messageID collision. This can cause a client application to treat a failed authentication (bind) attempt as successful.

  2. CVE-2026-104059 8.1 Élevée

    lektor

    Lektor 3.3.14 and 3.4.0b15 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the admin API blueprint that allows unauthenticated attackers to perform state-changing actions by sending cross-origin requests without CSRF tokens, Origin/Referer validation, CORS configuration, or Host allowlisting. Attackers can exploit the newattachment, deleterecord, build, clean, and publish endpoints from a malicious web page to write arbitrary files, delete pages, wipe build output, trigger deployment publication, and via DNS rebinding reach read endpoints to disclose data.

  3. CVE-2026-104056 9.8 Critique

    Authlib

    Authlib version 1.7.2 and below contains a vulnerability where discovery JSON metadata is cached without validation or issuer-origin binding. This allows a poisoned discovery response to replace all endpoint values with attacker-controlled values rather than endpoint URLs that share the origin of the configured server metadata URL.

  4. CVE-2026-103237 8.3 Élevée

    MISP

    MISP contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its ORM save path. When a user submits data through various endpoints (attribute add/edit, event edit, free-text import, sighting capture, shadow attribute proposal, event report creation, object reference add, user admin edit), the application sanitizes the flat record by stripping the primary key and pinning the event_id or object_id to the caller's context. However, the underlying ORM's set() method gives priority to a nested key whose name matches the model alias and discards the outer scalar fields. An authenticated user with basic write permissions can exploit this by embedding a nested block under the model alias key inside their request. The sanitization logic (id removal, event_id pinning) is applied to the outer record, but the ORM binds to the inner record instead, which carries an attacker-chosen id and event_id. This allows the attacker to overwrite, re-parent, or soft-delete rows belonging to other organizations or events they have no read access to. Impact: - Cross-tenant data integrity compromise (attribute values rewritten, objects re-parented to attacker events, rows soft-deleted) - Affects multiple entity types: Attribute, Object, EventReport, Sighting, AttributeTag, ShadowAttribute - Requires only a low-privilege authenticated account with perm_add Affected versions: <2.5.48

  5. CVE-2026-79537 9.1 Critique

    metatool-ai MetaMCP through 2.4.22 contains an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) in the MCP transport session dispatch. The session store (getSession in session-lifetime-manager.ts) is keyed only by the client-supplied mcp-session-id header with no owner, namespace, or endpoint binding, and the per-endpoint authorization middleware validates only the URL endpoint's owner, never the session. An attacker who supplies another tenant's session id " obtained without authentication from GET /metamcp/health/sessions, which discloses active session IDs and namespace UUIDs " can list and execute the victim tenant's private MCP tools and exfiltrate their data using the victim's forwarded credentials.