Veille CVE

Vendredi 18 septembre 2026

6 CVE

Critique 0 Élevée 3 Moyenne 3 Faible 0 Non évaluée 0 Exploitées (KEV) Tri : plus récentes « Spring AI » ✕
  1. CVE-2026-76899 5.7 Moyenne

    1Panel-dev CordysCRM

    CordysCRM is an open source AI-powered customer relationship management system that supports private deployment. From 1.7.0 until 1.7.4, POST /account-pool/page allows an authenticated caller with MODULE_SETTING_UPDATE to place an arbitrary database function in SortRequest.name because CustomerPoolController.page omits Spring request validation, SortRequest.getName relies on an incomplete blacklist, and the CommonMapper.xml sort fragment inserts ${sortName} into an ORDER BY clause. Functions such as extractvalue and updatexml bypass the blacklist and can expose database values through an error oracle when the query returns at least one row. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.4.

  2. CVE-2026-93576 7.5 Élevée

    Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4 · Red Hat Fuse 7 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 · Red Hat Single Sign-On 7

    A flaw was found in Netty netty-codec-smtp. The component does not properly validate Carriage Return (CR) and Line Feed (LF) characters in the SMTP command-name field. A remote attacker, if an application routes untrusted input into this field, can embed CR/LF characters to inject arbitrary SMTP commands. This can lead to SMTP command smuggling, allowing for unauthorized email relay or spoofing of sender/recipient addresses. While the impact is significant, the real-world exploitability is considered lower as applications typically do not place user-controlled data in the command-name field.

  3. CVE-2026-93573 6.5 Moyenne

    Red Hat Build of Debezium 3.6 · Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.5.SP2 · Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.3.SP2 · Red Hat AMQ Broker 7

    A flaw was found in Netty's HTTP/1.1 decoder. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to bypass `Transfer-Encoding` header validation by splitting the `Transfer-Encoding` field across multiple headers, with the last field containing a non-final transfer coding like `gzip` or `deflate`. This bypass can lead to HTTP request smuggling, enabling attackers to bypass security controls, desynchronize request processing, or cause requests to be processed in an unintended context.

  4. CVE-2026-93565 7.5 Élevée

    Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 3.33.3.SP2 · Red Hat Build of Debezium 3.6 · Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.5.SP2 · Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.3.SP2

    A flaw was found in Netty RtspDecoder. The `RtspMethods.valueOf()` function incorrectly strips trailing control bytes from method tokens in Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) requests. A remote attacker can exploit this by sending a specially crafted RTSP request, leading to method-token smuggling. This vulnerability allows an attacker to bypass method-based access controls and can also be used to launder malicious requests through Netty-based RTSP proxies, making them appear legitimate to backend systems.

  5. CVE-2026-93578 5.9 Moyenne

    Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4

    A flaw was found in Netty's Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Client. The client fails to verify the 'id-kp-OCSPSigning' Extended Key Usage (EKU) in OCSP responder certificates. A remote attacker, holding any valid certificate issued by the same Certificate Authority (CA), can exploit this by forging 'GOOD' OCSP responses for revoked certificates. This bypasses certificate revocation checks, allowing applications using Netty's OCSP Client to accept certificates that should have been revoked, leading to an authorization bypass.

  6. CVE-2026-93575 7.5 Élevée

    Red Hat AMQ Broker 7 · Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4 · Red Hat Fuse 7 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7

    A flaw was found in Netty's MqttDecoder. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted MQTT CONNECT packet. The decoder fails to properly validate the 'Properties Length' against the 'Remaining Length', allowing an attacker to bypass size limits. This leads to excessive memory and CPU consumption, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) due to an OutOfMemoryError.