Veille CVE

Septembre 2026

3 167 CVE

  1. CVE-2026-92173 9.1 Critique

    Meta Platforms, Inc Meta Horizon OS

    Prior to v74.0.0.878.1682 of Meta Horizon OS, MediaSyncJobReceiver could be induced to send a privileged PendingIntent including a com.oculus.vrshell CallerIdentity to an arbitrary application listening via NotificationListenerService. That would allow the application to impersonate the com.oculus.vrshell package, as well as packages signed with the same key, towards any endpoint within the OS that uses CallerIdentity authentication.

  2. CVE-2026-92172 8.8 Élevée

    Meta Platforms, Inc Meta Horizon OS

    Prior to v66.0.0.733.524 of Meta Horizon OS, OVRMediaService could be induced to send a privileged PendingIntent including a com.oculus.horizon CallerIdentity to an arbitrary application registering for com.oculus.systemactivities.SCREENSHOT via a broadcast receiver. That would allow the application to impersonate the com.oculus.horizon package towards any endpoint within the OS that uses CallerIdentity authentication.

  3. CVE-2026-51872 9.8 Critique

    Devika v1.0 is vulnerable to Code Injection via the Runner.run_code function in src/agents/runner/runner.py.

  4. CVE-2026-51871 9.8 Critique

    Devika v1.0 is vulnerable to Code Injection in the Runner.execute function in src/agents/runner/runner.py which allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution by exploiting the direct execution of LLM-generated content.

  5. CVE-2026-51870 9.8 Critique

    DeepTutor v1.4.0 is vulnerable to command execution in /tutorbot/agent/tools/shell.py:ExecTool.execute.

  6. CVE-2026-51869 9.8 Critique

    DB-GPT v0.8.0 sandbox API silently falls back to LocalRuntime and executes code on host.

  7. CVE-2026-51867 9.8 Critique

    agentgpt v.1.0.0 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control in next/src/server/api/routers/agentRouter.ts. An externally reachable path accepts a caller-selected object or tenant identifier and reaches a data-access operation without a visible owner, tenant, workspace, or membership binding on that object.

  8. CVE-2026-51866 9.8 Critique

    In DB-GPT 0.7.5 and 0.8.0, a skill uploaded through the real /api/v1/skills/upload route can later be executed through the real /api/v1/chat/react-agent flow.

  9. CVE-2026-51864 9.1 Critique

    DB-GPT v0.7.5 and v0.8.0 contains directory traversal in python_file_upload (packages/dbgpt-app/src/dbgpt_app/openapi/api_v1/python_upload_api.py:42). A remote attacker can use the validated exploitation path to write files outside the intended workspace or storage boundary.

  10. CVE-2026-51862 9.1 Critique

    DB-GPT 0.8.0 contains directory traversal in skill_upload (packages/dbgpt-app/src/dbgpt_app/openapi/api_v1/agentic_data_api.py:40). A remote attacker can use the validated exploitation path to write files outside the intended workspace or storage boundary.

  11. CVE-2026-51861 9.8 Critique

    bisheng 2.3.0, 2.4.0, and 2.4.0-beta1 is vulnerable to Code Injection in src/backend/bisheng/api/v1/validate.py.

  12. CVE-2026-51860 7.5 Élevée

    bisheng 2.3.0, 2.4.0, and 2.4.0-beta1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in src/backend/bisheng/linsight/domain/task_exec.py.

  13. CVE-2026-51859 9.1 Critique

    bisheng 2.3.0, 2.4.0, and 2.4.0-beta1 is vulnerable to directory traversal in save_download_file (src/backend/bisheng/core/cache/utils.py:290).

  14. CVE-2026-51858 9.8 Critique

    In camel-ai camel 0.2.91a1, v0.2.91a2 and v0.2.91a3, TerminalToolkit.shell_exec allows prompt-driven shell command execution without an approval boundary.

  15. CVE-2026-51857 9.8 Critique

    In camel-ai camel 0.2.91a1, v0.2.91a2 and v0.2.91a3, CodeExecutionToolkit can run model-produced Python code through SubprocessInterpreter without an approval boundary.

  16. CVE-2026-51856 9.8 Critique

    In agentscope 1.0.18, 1.0.19, and 1.0.19 when the RealtimeAgent session exposes execute_python_code as an available tool, a remote WebSocket user can prompt the agent to call that tool and run Python code in the service environment. In the validated path, RealtimeAgent._acting forwards the model-produced tool call to Toolkit.call_tool_function, which invokes execute_python_code without an additional approval or isolation boundary on that path.

  17. CVE-2026-51853 7.5 Élevée

    agent-zero 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, and 1.10 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in python/helpers/file_browser.py:FileBrowser.__init__. The FileBrowser class initializes with the host root directory as the workspace, allowing the agent to access any file on the system without restriction.

  18. CVE-2026-51852 7.5 Élevée

    agent-zero 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, and 1.10 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in python/helpers/file_browser.py:FileBrowser.save_file_b64. The save_file_b64 method accepts user-controlled file paths without normalization or validation, allowing path traversal attacks.

  19. CVE-2026-51570 8.1 Élevée

    modelscope Agentscope v1.0.0-v1.0.8 is vulnerable to Path Traversal in insert_text_file.

  20. CVE-2026-51568 8.1 Élevée

    modelscope Agentscope v1.0.18-v1.0.0 is vulnerable to Path Traversal in write_text_file.

  21. CVE-2026-103000 7.5 Élevée

    py-pdf pypdf · Pypdf project pypdf

    pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.19.0, a crafted PDF can provide unusually large alphabetical page-label values that cause pypdf/_page_labels.py to generate strings beyond a reasonable page-label length when an application retrieves document page labels, consuming excessive memory and potentially making the application unavailable. This issue is fixed in version 6.19.0.

  22. CVE-2026-102999 7.5 Élevée

    py-pdf pypdf · Pypdf project pypdf

    pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.19.0, a crafted PDF containing many embedded files can cause the dictionary-based attachments API in pypdf/_doc_common.py to reparse the full attachment list for each content lookup, producing repeated work and long runtimes when an application accesses the embedded-file mapping. This issue is fixed in version 6.19.0.

  23. CVE-2026-102998 7.5 Élevée

    py-pdf pypdf · Pypdf project pypdf

    pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.19.0, a crafted PDF with form field values can cause pypdf/generic/_appearance_stream.py appearance-stream generation to repeat invariant selection-data work inside a loop when an application updates fields with flattening enabled, resulting in excessive runtimes and application unavailability. This issue is fixed in version 6.19.0.

  24. CVE-2026-102997 7.5 Élevée

    py-pdf pypdf · Pypdf project pypdf

    pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.18.1, a crafted PDF containing a partially malformed /FlateDecode stream with padded data can force pypdf/filters.py to use inefficient byte-by-byte decompression while the earlier recovery counter fails to advance for bytes that successfully decode, causing long runtimes and application unavailability. This is a residual issue after the malformed FlateDecode recovery fix. This issue is fixed in version 6.18.1.

  25. CVE-2026-102996 7.5 Élevée

    py-pdf pypdf · Pypdf project pypdf

    pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.18.1, a crafted PDF can provide a TrueType or Type1 simple font with an unusually large /Widths array, causing pypdf/_font.py Font._collect_tt_t1_character_widths to process entries beyond the 256 character codes meaningful for a simple font and consume excessive memory during operations such as text extraction. This issue is fixed in version 6.18.1.

  26. CVE-2026-102995 7.5 Élevée

    py-pdf pypdf · Pypdf project pypdf

    pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.18.1, a crafted PDF can place unusually large source-code or destination-string tokens in a font /ToUnicode mapping, causing pypdf/_cmap.py parse_bfchar to decode and retain oversized values during operations such as text extraction and consume excessive memory. This is a second follow-up to earlier /ToUnicode resource-consumption fixes and is limited to the remaining token-length path. This issue is fixed in version 6.18.1.

  27. CVE-2026-102150 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Secure Data Forms · Accellion kiteworks

    A function in the Kiteworks Advanced Forms component was reachable without authentication. An unauthenticated attacker could potentially use it to carry out a limited set of internal service operations on the Kiteworks platform; it did not permit access to user accounts, stored files, or form submissions.

  28. CVE-2026-102149 9.4 Critique

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently restrict which account a certificate could be assigned to. This could allow an attacker to associate a certificate with another user's account, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of that account's encrypted mail and, where certificate-based login is enabled, potentially permitting unauthorized access to the account.

  29. CVE-2026-102147 9.3 Critique

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) weakness in Kiteworks Core could allow an unauthenticated attacker to store crafted content that later executes arbitrary JavaScript in the authenticated session of an administrator who views the affected page. This could have permitted the attacker to gain full administrative control, including the creation of a new administrative account.

  30. CVE-2026-102146 6.5 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    An authenticated Email Protection Gateway administrator holding only limited, delegated permissions could write files with attacker-controlled content to arbitrary locations accessible to the Email Protection Gateway service account. This exceeds the administrator's intended privileges and could be used to alter application files and configuration or to disrupt the availability of the service.

  31. CVE-2026-102145 6.6 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    An authenticated administrator could cause the server to issue requests to, and interact with, internal network services that are not meant to be reachable through this interface. On its own this did not result in code execution.

  32. CVE-2026-102144 5.3 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    A resource exhaustion vulnerability in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly trigger a comparatively expensive server-side operation, causing a partial denial of service.

  33. CVE-2026-102143 7.5 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    An unauthenticated attacker could cause a file with attacker-controlled content to be written to the appliance filesystem through an administrative upload handler that did not properly authenticate the request. This did not by itself result in code execution, which would require a separate vulnerability to place the file in an executable location.

  34. CVE-2026-102142 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A system notification template on the Kiteworks appliance was rendered by a template engine that evaluated expressions contained in the stored template body. An authenticated System Administrator could potentially store a crafted template that executed operating-system commands on the appliance when the notification was next sent.

  35. CVE-2026-102141 6.7 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Two Kiteworks Core cluster-management operations did not validate file paths supplied to them, so an attacker holding root on one node of a cluster could write files as root onto another node and cause them to be executed there. Exploitation requires backend root access on a cluster node and a pending software patch present on the target node.

  36. CVE-2026-102140 4.9 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    An authenticated administrator could initiate an administrative import using a file whose contents were not fully verified, because the import validated only the file's header rather than the complete file. This could allow unverified or forged content to be accepted and processed, affecting the integrity of the imported data.

  37. CVE-2026-102139 6.5 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    An authorization check in the large file exchange feature of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not correctly establish that the requesting user was a party to the package being requested. An authenticated user of that optional feature could read the subject, message body, and attachments of packages they neither sent nor received.

  38. CVE-2026-102138 3.3 Faible

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    An authenticated administrator on a node with an optional, separately licensed gateway role enabled could supply a connector URL that the server retrieved without sufficient validation of its scheme or destination, causing the server to issue requests to internal network services. Exploitation requires the licensed gateway role to be active.

  39. CVE-2026-102137 4.1 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    An authenticated administrator could bypass the content validation applied to an administrative file upload and store a file containing dangerous content on the appliance. This did not by itself result in code execution, which would require a separate vulnerability to run the stored file.

  40. CVE-2026-102136 6.3 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    In multi-node deployments, an attacker who had already obtained code execution on one appliance node could submit a value through an internal cluster interface that was written into monitoring configuration on another node without sufficient validation, potentially allowing OS commands to be executed there. Execution was limited to an unprivileged service account on that node.

  41. CVE-2026-102135 6.6 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    On a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway cluster with database replication enabled, a party trusted by the cluster could submit a crafted serialized object that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing code execution as the gateway service account. Replication is disabled by default, and exploitation requires control of a trusted cluster peer or administrative access to the appliance.

  42. CVE-2026-102134 5.4 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core did not apply its gateway-level API security controls to every request authenticated through the platform's central authentication service. An authenticated user could reach REST API functionality over a request path on which those controls, including enforcement of signed-out and revoked sessions, were not applied.

  43. CVE-2026-102133 6.6 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    An optional, separately licensed repository-connector feature in Kiteworks Core did not neutralize special characters in a user-supplied path before passing it to an external command. An authenticated system administrator could inject additional commands and write arbitrary content to files owned by the service account running the connector, enabling code execution in that account's context; exploitation additionally requires network egress from the appliance to a system under the attacker's control.

  44. CVE-2026-102132 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    An administrative import function in Kiteworks Core did not verify that the requesting administrator was entitled to create the privileged integration credential being imported. A delegated administrator holding a single narrowly scoped administrative permission could therefore obtain full system administrator privileges, without any action by an existing system administrator.

  45. CVE-2026-102131 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway rejected certain configuration settings, but its validation did not recognize every form in which they could be supplied. An authenticated administrator could potentially use an unrecognized form to have a file of their choosing written to the gateway and executed, resulting in code execution as the gateway service account.

  46. CVE-2026-102130 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently validate the content of an uploaded backup, and allowed an administrator to influence how the application loaded it. An authenticated administrator could potentially use this to execute arbitrary code on the gateway as the underlying service account.

  47. CVE-2026-102129 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A user-provisioning interface in Kiteworks Core did not verify that the requesting administrator was entitled to grant the role being assigned. An administrator whose delegated permissions covered role changes alone could therefore raise an account to full system-administrator privileges.

  48. CVE-2026-102128 7.5 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    An identity-verification weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed the gateway to act on the Kiteworks platform on behalf of a user it had not authenticated, and to provision a platform account for an identity it did not already know. A remote, unauthenticated sender could potentially exploit this to obtain control of a platform account.

  49. CVE-2026-102127 7.0 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    An XML parser used by Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not restrict external entity references. Where an optional, non-default message-processing feature is enabled, a remote and unauthenticated sender could potentially use a crafted message to read files accessible to the gateway service account, including cryptographic key material and credentials, and have them sent to a destination they control.

  50. CVE-2026-102126 8.1 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) weakness in Kiteworks Core could allow an administrator holding only a single, narrowly scoped delegated permission to store crafted content that later executes arbitrary JavaScript in the authenticated session of a System Administrator who views the affected page. This could have permitted the lower-privileged administrator to escalate to full administrative control of the tenant, including the creation of a new administrative account.

  51. CVE-2026-102125 8.8 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    The sandbox that isolates document conversion on a Kiteworks appliance did not fully confine the code running inside it. Code already executing within that sandbox could potentially escape its confinement and act with the privileges of the service account that runs the application, which could allow an attacker in that position to read or modify application data and configuration, or to disrupt the service on the affected appliance.

  52. CVE-2026-102124 6.5 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A Kiteworks appliance setup interface did not enforce authentication once the appliance had completed initial configuration. An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the appliance could read and modify a limited set of setup records, including a contact name and email address captured during initial configuration.

  53. CVE-2026-102123 7.4 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A Kiteworks appliance setup interface did not confine a user-supplied file path to its intended directory, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to write a file to any location writable by the affected service account, potentially compromising the integrity of the appliance or rendering it unavailable until an operator intervenes. Exploitation requires network access to the affected interface, which is not reachable on a fully configured appliance in its default configuration; reaching it depends on either the transient window while an appliance is first being provisioned or a non-default appliance configuration.

  54. CVE-2026-102122 4.3 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks did not correctly enforce which roles a shared folder's manager was permitted to assign. In a default configuration, an authenticated user holding the Manager role on a folder could grant the Owner role to themselves or to other members of that folder.

  55. CVE-2026-102121 8.6 Élevée

    Kiteworks Secure Data Forms · Accellion kiteworks

    A form-rendering interface in the Advanced Forms component is reachable without authentication so that published forms can be displayed to anonymous visitors, but it returned more data than the form itself required. Anyone who knew the web address of a published form could potentially retrieve the form owner's Kiteworks account profile, including personal details, along with parts of the deployment's configuration settings; no passwords, authentication tokens, or multi-factor secrets were exposed.

  56. CVE-2026-102120 8.8 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A privilege escalation vulnerability in Kiteworks could have allowed an attacker who had already obtained code execution on one node of a clustered Kiteworks deployment to run operating system commands with elevated privileges on another node of the same cluster. Insufficient input validation in an internal cluster management function let attacker-supplied values reach a privileged execution context; exploitation requires existing access to a node in the cluster, and the affected function is not reachable from outside the cluster.

  57. CVE-2026-102119 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outside the feature's designated directory. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.

  58. CVE-2026-102118 7.8 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A local privilege escalation vulnerability in Kiteworks could have allowed an attacker with an existing shell under a low-privileged service account to escalate to root privileges on the appliance.

  59. CVE-2026-102117 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    On deployments where the remote-support capability is licensed and enabled, an authenticated System Administrator who also possessed the key protecting the submitted data could redirect the underlying system's outbound support connection to a destination of their choosing. That destination could then have operating-system commands executed on the node and receive their output, potentially resulting in remote code execution with the privileges of a local service account.

  60. CVE-2026-102116 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    -A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the application to execute it, potentially resulting in remote code execution as the underlying service account.

  61. CVE-2026-102115 9.8 Critique

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core did not correctly validate a parameter submitted to the password reset workflow. An unauthenticated attacker who knew the email address of a user with a locally stored password could potentially reset that account's password without access to the emailed reset link and then authenticate as that user, including where the account holds administrative privileges.

  62. CVE-2026-102114 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A command injection vulnerability in Kiteworks could allow a high-privileged authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary operating-system commands as root on the affected appliance node. Successful exploitation requires an administrative account with elevated privileges.

  63. CVE-2026-102113 7.8 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A privilege escalation vulnerability in Kiteworks could allow an attacker who has already obtained code execution as an unprivileged backend service account on the appliance to escalate to root. A privileged routine did not safely handle a filesystem path that the lower-privileged account could influence, allowing the attacker to cause a root-owned operation to run arbitrary commands with the highest privileges. Exploitation requires existing local access to that service account.

  64. CVE-2026-102112 7.8 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    A privilege escalation vulnerability in Kiteworks could allow an attacker who has already obtained code execution as an unprivileged backend service account on the appliance to escalate to root and run arbitrary commands with the highest privileges. Exploitation requires existing local access to that service account.

  65. CVE-2026-102111 4.9 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks did not enforce the maximum permitted value for a configurable security-policy setting. An authenticated administrator could set this value outside its intended range so that the associated control never activated, while the control continued to appear enabled in the administrative interface and audit log, allowing it to be silently rendered ineffective.

  66. CVE-2026-102110 5.9 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    An endpoint used during initial appliance setup did not require authentication and did not correctly enforce its intended state precondition, so during the initial activation window an unauthenticated network attacker could repeatedly re-trigger the privileged activation process. This could disrupt setup and leave the appliance in an incompletely configured state. The issue is only reachable while an appliance is being activated for the first time and not yet fully configured.

  67. CVE-2026-102109 7.1 Élevée

    Kiteworks Secure Data Forms · Accellion kiteworks

    A SQL injection vulnerability existed in Kiteworks Secure Data Forms, where a value derived from the authenticated user's stored account data was incorporated into a database query without proper sanitization. An authenticated user could potentially influence that value to inject SQL. Exploitation requires an authenticated session and applies only to deployments where a specific optional feature is in use.

  68. CVE-2026-102108 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the gateway service account. Exploitation requires an administrator account holding a specific queue-management privilege.

  69. CVE-2026-102107 4.6 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core contains a business logic flaw in a Kiteworks file-request feature allowed an authenticated user to send a request that appeared to originate from another user, because the server did not verify that the requester was authorized to act as the specified account. This could be used to solicit files or information from a recipient under a trusted identity; exploitation requires the feature to be enabled for the attacker's profile and the targeted recipient to act on the request.

  70. CVE-2026-102106 9.1 Critique

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service. An administrative service in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not consistently enforce administrator authentication, so the required password check could be bypassed. An attacker who referenced a valid administrator account could potentially create, modify, or delete internal users and managed domains and change their security-feature configuration without authenticating; deleting a managed domain also removes its user accounts and could lock administrators out of the gateway.

  71. CVE-2026-102105 9.1 Critique

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway renders message content that references external resources. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or trigger unintended actions on internal systems.

  72. CVE-2026-102104 9.1 Critique

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway performs an online certificate status check for an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.

  73. CVE-2026-102103 9.1 Critique

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves a certificate revocation list in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.

  74. CVE-2026-102102 9.1 Critique

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves an issuer certificate in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.

  75. CVE-2026-102101 8.1 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data. A deserialization weakness in Kiteworks Core could, under certain conditions, allow crafted data to be deserialized unsafely, potentially resulting in remote code execution on the appliance. Exploitation depends on an attacker first being able to influence the affected data, so this issue is not exploitable on its own.

  76. CVE-2026-102100 8.7 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting. A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) weakness in Kiteworks Core could allow an authenticated user to submit content that, when later viewed by another user, executes arbitrary JavaScript in that user's authenticated session. This could be used to perform actions on the victim's behalf and may have permitted account takeover, including of higher-privileged users. Exploitation requires the victim to view the attacker-supplied content.

  77. CVE-2026-102099 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Write. An improper restriction of a user-supplied file path in a Kiteworks administrative export feature could allow an authenticated administrator to write a file to an arbitrary location on the underlying host, potentially leading to command execution on the appliance. Exploitation requires an existing, authenticated administrative account with access to the affected export function.

  78. CVE-2026-102098 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection. A stored SQL injection vulnerability in a Kiteworks administrative reporting feature could allow an authenticated administrator to read sensitive data from the underlying database and to affect the availability of the service. Exploitation requires an existing, authenticated administrative account with access to the affected reporting function.

  79. CVE-2026-102097 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an authenticated administrator to import configuration whose contents were not sufficiently validated before being processed. A crafted submission could potentially allow arbitrary commands to be executed on the affected gateway.

  80. CVE-2026-102096 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to OS Command Injection that allows an authenticated administrator to upload a configuration package whose contents were not sufficiently validated before being processed. A crafted package could cause the underlying system to execute arbitrary operating-system commands, potentially with elevated privileges, on the affected appliance.

  81. CVE-2026-102095 9.1 Critique

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway performed server-side fetches of URLs contained in the message content it processed, without adequately restricting the fetch destination. A remote, unauthenticated sender could craft a message that caused the gateway to issue requests to internal services and cloud instance metadata endpoints and return the responses, potentially disclosing sensitive internal data and, depending on the internal service reached, affecting its state.

  82. CVE-2026-102094 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Unsafe Reflection and does not sufficiently restrict the code that the mail-processing pipeline could load from an imported rule configuration. An authenticated administrator with mail-rule configuration privileges could cause the gateway to load and execute code beyond the approved set of mail-processing components, potentially in the context of the mail-gateway service account.

  83. CVE-2026-102093 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Improper Privilege Management and does not correctly enforce restrictions on role assignment, which could allow an authenticated administrative user with limited, non-Sysadmin role-management permissions to elevate another user to full system-administrator privileges beyond those the administrative user was authorized to grant.

  84. CVE-2026-102092 8.7 Élevée

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) that could allow an authenticated user to store crafted content that executes arbitrary JavaScript in another user's authenticated session when they preview shared content. This could potentially lead to session compromise and account takeover.

  85. CVE-2026-102091 7.5 Élevée

    Kiteworks Secure Data Forms · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Secure Data Forms before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to make the server issue arbitrary outbound network requests and read back the responses. This could potentially be used to reach internal-only services or other network-restricted resources.

  86. CVE-2026-102090 4.3 Moyenne

    Kiteworks Core · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Core before version 9.5.1 is vulnerable to Content Injection. A URL parameter in the PDF viewer was insufficiently validated, allowing an attacker-controlled document to be loaded and displayed under the trust of the legitimate application domain. This could increase the credibility of phishing attempts relying on malicious links embedded in the displayed content.

  87. CVE-2026-102089 7.2 Élevée

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway · Accellion kiteworks

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to a path traversal weakness in an administrative import function allowed an authenticated administrator to write files to arbitrary locations on the server. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.

  88. CVE-2026-101276 9.2 Critique

    esnet iperf3

    iperf3 3.21 (esnet/iperf) contains a remote, unauthenticated heap use-after-free: the server's per-test watchdog server_timer_proc() frees streams without cancelling/joining their worker threads, so a blocked worker dereferences a freed iperf_stream; fixed in 3.22.

  89. CVE-2024-58387 7.5 Élevée

    Inspur Haiyue HCM Cloud

    Inspur Haiyue HCM Cloud contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the /api/model_report/file/download endpoint that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files by supplying unvalidated path parameters index and ext. Attackers can craft requests such as /api/model_report/file/download?index=/&ext=<path> to traverse the filesystem and disclose sensitive files including /etc/passwd, application database files, and system configuration files. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-11-04 .

  90. CVE-2023-54403 7.5 Élevée

    Yonyou U8 CRM

    Yonyou U8 CRM before V16.5 and V18 contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in /ajax/getemaildata.php that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication using the DontCheckLogin=1 parameter and read arbitrary files via an unvalidated filePath parameter. Attackers can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files outside the web application directory, including configuration files containing database or service credentials. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2023-10-14.

  91. CVE-2023-54402 7.5 Élevée

    iDocView

    iDocView contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in its /doc/upload endpoint that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to fetch arbitrary URLs by supplying a hardcoded default token value (testtoken) to bypass authentication. Attackers can exploit the unrestricted URL scheme handling, including file:// URIs, to read arbitrary local files such as operating-system and application configuration files, and to reach internal network hosts and services not otherwise accessible. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-03-26.

  92. CVE-2026-103548 5.3 Moyenne

    Itron MV-90 xi

    Improperly stored passwords in the config file in Itron MV-90 xi 3.0 allows attackers to decode the passwords and password histories to gain access to the MV-90 application as any user.

  93. CVE-2026-103547 9.2 Critique

    OpenBSD

    In ldapd in OpenBSD 7.8 before errata 057 and 7.9 before errata 021, delegated BSD authentication results are correlated only by the LDAP child process client file descriptor and LDAP message ID. After a connection closes, a later connection that reuses the same file descriptor and message ID can receive the earlier authentication result. A remote attacker who can reach ldapd can complete a Bind as another identity. A missing connection can also cause a NULL pointer dereference. (ldapd is not enabled by default.)

  94. CVE-2026-103387 4.3 Moyenne

    garycourt uri-js

    A weakness has been identified in garycourt uri-js up to 4.4.1. This affects the function URI.parse of the file src/schemes/mailto.ts of the component Mailto Header Handler. This manipulation of the argument to causes uncaught exception. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

  95. CVE-2026-102994 7.5 Élevée

    py-pdf pypdf · Pypdf project pypdf

    pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.18.0, a crafted PDF containing indirect-object identifiers or generation-number tokens that continue for a long time without whitespace can cause pypdf/_reader.py and pypdf/generic/_base.py to scan excessive input through read_until_whitespace, resulting in long runtimes and application unavailability. This issue is fixed in version 6.18.0.

  96. CVE-2026-102993 7.5 Élevée

    py-pdf pypdf · Pypdf project pypdf

    pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.17.0, a crafted PDF can provide unusually large Roman page-label values that cause pypdf/_page_labels.py to generate excessively large numeral strings when an application retrieves document page labels, consuming large amounts of memory and potentially making the application unavailable. This issue is fixed in version 6.17.0.

  97. CVE-2026-102992 9.2 Critique

    piscinajs piscina

    piscina is a node.js worker pool implementation. Prior to 4.9.4, 5.3.2, and 6.0.0-rc.5, Piscina stores ThreadPool.options in src/index.ts as a plain object that inherits from Object.prototype. Applications with a separate prototype-pollution primitive can therefore supply inherited values for security-sensitive options that do not have own defaults. An inherited execArgv value is passed to the Node.js Worker constructor and can preload attacker-controlled code in worker threads, an inherited loadBalancer function can execute during task scheduling, and inherited env values can alter worker environments. This issue is fixed in versions 4.9.4, 5.3.2, and 6.0.0-rc.5.

  98. CVE-2026-102991 6.5 Moyenne

    sqlalchemy mako

    Mako is a template library written in Python. Prior to 1.4.2, on Windows, TemplateLookup.get_template() in mako/lookup.py resolves template URIs with posixpath, while Template.__init__() in mako/template.py validates them with os.path, which uses ntpath. A URI beginning with a drive designator causes ntpath to absorb the traversal segments before the leading dot-dot check, while posixpath resolution can escape the configured template directory. An application that passes attacker-controlled template names or include paths can disclose process-readable files on the same volume, and a targeted file containing Mako template syntax may also be parsed and executed as a template. Raw URL paths are generally normalized before reaching this form, but query strings, form or JSON bodies, route parameters, and dynamic include expressions can preserve it. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.2.

  99. CVE-2026-102990 8.2 Élevée

    patrickjuchli basic-ftp

    basic-ftp is an FTP client for Node.js. Prior to 6.2.1, Client.list() can be forced by a malicious or compromised FTP server to spend quadratic CPU time parsing a directory listing because the RE_LINE expression in src/parseListUnix.ts backtracks across adjacent variable-length owner and group fields when a long Unix-style line has a valid prefix but cannot satisfy the later size and date fields. parseList() selects a parser from the last nonblank line and then applies it to every line, so a normal final line can select the Unix parser while an earlier crafted line blocks the Node.js event loop and freezes the process. This issue is fixed in version 6.2.1.

  100. CVE-2026-101885 7.8 Élevée

    zeroclaw-labs ZeroClaw

    ZeroClaw versions before 0.8.5 built with plugins-wasm feature contain a path traversal vulnerability in plugin installation that fails to validate the wasm_path manifest field. Attackers can convince users to install crafted plugins that write arbitrary files to paths outside the plugins directory, such as shell startup files, enabling code execution.

  101. CVE-2026-101884 7.5 Élevée

    OpenClaw Windows Node

    OpenClaw Windows Node before 2026.7.1 contains an incomplete environment-variable sanitizer in system.run that fails to block GIT_CONFIG_*, DOTNET_STARTUP_HOOKS, and JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS variables. Attackers with gateway or agent access can supply these variables to allowlisted tools like git, dotnet, or java to load attacker-controlled code and achieve arbitrary code execution.

  102. CVE-2026-101883 5.4 Moyenne

    OpenClaw Windows Node

    OpenClaw Windows Node through 2026.9.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the canvas.present capability that bypasses URL risk evaluation enforced by canvas.navigate. Attackers with gateway or agent access can issue canvas.present to make the node's WebView send requests to localhost, private networks, or tailnet services from the user's machine.

  103. CVE-2026-101882 8.8 Élevée

    OpenClaw Windows Node

    OpenClaw Windows Node before 2026.7.1 contains an incomplete validation vulnerability in system.execApprovals.set that accepts wildcard-executable rules and abusable system binaries like mshta, rundll32, and certutil. Remote callers can add broad allow rules to execute arbitrary commands on the Windows host through system.run without operator checks or user prompts.

  104. CVE-2026-101881 6.5 Moyenne

    OpenClaw Windows Node

    OpenClaw Windows Node before 2026.7.1 contains an allocation of resources without limits vulnerability in the gateway WebSocket transport that allows connected gateways to exhaust node memory. Attackers can send an unending sequence of WebSocket continuation frames without EndOfMessage to cause unbounded memory growth until the node process crashes.

  105. CVE-2026-101880 8.8 Élevée

    OpenClaw Windows Node

    OpenClaw Windows Node before 2026.7.1 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the system.run exec-approval policy where ExecShellWrapperParser fails to split commands on pipe operators or extract command substitutions. Connected gateways or agents can bypass approval rules by placing denied commands behind allowed prefixes using pipe operators or command substitution syntax, achieving arbitrary command execution on Windows hosts.

  106. CVE-2026-101879 6.5 Moyenne

    OpenClaw Windows Node

    OpenClaw Windows Node before 2026.7.1-3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in NodeService capture handlers that allows connected gateways or agents to perform screen snapshots, camera snaps, and location captures without consent prompts. Attackers can invoke screen.snapshot, camera.snap, and location.get over the node WebSocket to silently capture screenshots, photograph users through webcams, and obtain device geolocation without user interaction.

  107. CVE-2026-97291 8.8 Élevée

    Magazine3 Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP

    Contributor PHP Object Injection in Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP <= 1.66 versions.

  108. CVE-2026-97290 7.1 Élevée

    Sayontan Sinha Photonic Gallery & Lightbox for Flickr, SmugMug & Others

    Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Photonic Gallery & Lightbox for Flickr, SmugMug & Others <= 3.36 versions.

  109. CVE-2026-97265 6.5 Moyenne

    Crocoblock. Jetimpex Inc. JetEngine

    Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Crocoblock. Jetimpex Inc. JetEngine allows Stored XSS. This issue affects JetEngine: from n/a through 3.8.15.3.

  110. CVE-2026-97256 7.2 Élevée

    Greg – SiteOrigin Page Builder by SiteOrigin

    Editor PHP Object Injection in Page Builder by SiteOrigin <= 2.36.0 versions.

  111. CVE-2026-94171 7.1 Élevée

    VillaTheme CURCY

    Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in VillaTheme CURCY woo-multi-currency allows DOM-Based XSS.This issue affects CURCY: 2.2.18.

  112. CVE-2026-87004 8.1 Élevée

    Quenary tugtainer

    Tugtainer is a self-hosted app for automating updates of Docker containers. Prior to version 1.31.3, when the OIDC login flow completes, backend/modules/auth/providers/auth_oidc_provider.py decodes the id_token returned by the identity provider's token endpoint using jose.jwt.get_unverified_claims() instead of jwt.decode(). This skips signature verification, audience (aud) validation, issuer (iss) validation, and expiry (exp) checking entirely. The extracted claims (email/sub/preferred_username) are then used directly as the user_id for the resulting Tugtainer session. This issue has been patched in version 1.31.3.

  113. CVE-2026-55224 8.7 Élevée

    MineAdmin

    MineAdmin is a ready-to-use backend management system suitable for quickly building website backends, operation platforms, permission centers, internal management systems, CMS, CRM, OA, ERP and other business applications. Prior to version 3.2.0-alpha.2, the app-store plugin service concatenates unsanitized user-supplied identifier values directly into file system paths. An attacker can use path traversal sequences (e.g., ../) to read, install, or uninstall plugins from arbitrary directories, and potentially execute arbitrary composer commands. This issue has been patched in version 3.2.0-alpha.2.

  114. CVE-2026-55107 10.0 Critique

    elct9620 kobako

    Kobako is a Ruby gem that embeds a Wasm-isolated mruby interpreter inside applications, allowing execution of untrusted Ruby scripts (LLM-generated code, user formulas, student submissions, third-party plugins) in-process without giving them access to host memory, files, network, or credentials. From version 0.1.0 to before version 0.9.1, a guest mruby script running inside the Kobako sandbox can execute arbitrary Ruby in the host process, fully escaping the sandbox. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.1.

  115. CVE-2026-55094 8.7 Élevée

    taskcluster

    Taskcluster is the task execution framework that supports Mozilla's continuous integration and release processes. Prior to version 100.3.0, Taskcluster is vulnerable to unauthenticated RCE on Taskcluster deployments with an anonymous role that exposes the GraphQL endpoint and parses filter arguments using the sift library. This issue has been patched in version 100.3.0.

  116. CVE-2026-53605 7.8 Élevée

    pollen-robotics reachy-mini-os

    Reachy Mini ISO for Wireless contains the necessary files to build a custom Raspberry Pi OS image for the Reachy Mini Wireless robot, using pi-gen. Prior to version 0.2.4, the Reachy Mini Wireless OS image shipped with an overly broad sudoers entry granting the pollen daemon user (uid 1000) passwordless sudo access to /usr/bin/systemctl with no subcommand or argument restriction. This is a local privilege escalation (LPE). Any process running as pollen can obtain full root (uid 0) on the device in three commands, with no additional vulnerability required and no user interaction. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.4.

  117. CVE-2026-103500 6.1 Moyenne

    Mozilla Thunderbird

    An attacker could cause a heap buffer overflow by getting a user to open an email that is greater than or equal to 2GB in size. This vulnerability was fixed in Thunderbird 157, Thunderbird 140.17, and Thunderbird 153.4.

  118. CVE-2026-103476 5.3 Moyenne

    yii2-starter-kit

    yii2-starter-kit through 4.2.0 fails to validate article publication status in the attachment-download endpoint, allowing unauthenticated attackers to download files from draft articles. Attackers can enumerate sequential attachment identifiers to retrieve files from unpublished articles without authentication or authorization checks.

  119. CVE-2026-103475 9.1 Critique

    yii2-starter-kit

    yii2-starter-kit through 4.2.0 exposes the Yii debug and Gii modules to all IP addresses by setting allowedIPs to ['*'] in its default development configuration. Unauthenticated remote attackers can access the debug endpoint to read sensitive data including session cookies and database queries, or access the Gii endpoint to generate and write PHP files into the application directory.

  120. CVE-2026-103474 8.8 Élevée

    yii2-starter-kit

    yii2-starter-kit through 4.2.0 fails to validate file types in the backend storage upload actions, allowing authenticated managers to upload PHP files. Attackers with manager role can upload PHP scripts to the web-accessible storage directory and request them to execute arbitrary code on the server.

  121. CVE-2026-103473 8.1 Élevée

    denoland deno

    Deno versions 2.7.0 through 2.9.7 on Windows contain a command injection vulnerability in node:child_process where shell arguments are escaped for the wrong shell type. Attackers can inject OS commands by passing untrusted arguments with the shell option, allowing arbitrary command execution with Deno process privileges.

  122. CVE-2026-103472 7.5 Élevée

    Corvusoft restbed

    restbed through 5.0.0 accepts WebSocket frames with declared payload lengths up to 2^63 bytes and buffers the payload without size limits in an unbounded stream buffer. Remote unauthenticated attackers can declare large frame sizes and stream payload data to exhaust server memory, causing denial of service through process crash.

  123. CVE-2026-103471 7.5 Élevée

    Corvusoft restbed

    restbed through 5.0.0 buffers HTTP request headers without enforcing a maximum size limit, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server memory. Attackers can open TCP connections and stream bytes indefinitely without sending the header delimiter, forcing the server to allocate unbounded heap memory until the process is killed.

  124. CVE-2026-103446 7.4 Élevée

    The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WikiLambda extension

    Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WikiLambda extension allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects MediaWiki WikiLambda extension: 1.46.

  125. CVE-2026-103445 1.2 Faible

    The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Page_Forms extension

    Improper neutralization of Script-Related HTML tags in a web page (basic XSS) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Page_Forms extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects MediaWiki Page_Forms extension: 1.46, 1.45, and 1.43.

  126. CVE-2026-103440 1.2 Faible

    The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PageTriage extension

    Exposure of sensitive information through data queries vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PageTriage extension allows Information Elicitation. This issue affects MediaWiki PageTriage extension: 1.46, 1.45, and 1.43.

  127. CVE-2026-103439 0.3 Faible

    The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Wikbase extension

    Improper neutralization of Script-Related HTML tags in a web page (basic XSS) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Wikbase extension allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects MediaWiki Wikbase extension: 1.46, 1.45, and 1.43.

  128. CVE-2026-103438 0.3 Faible

    The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Wikistories extension

    Improper neutralization of Script-Related HTML tags in a web page (basic XSS) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Wikistories extension allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects MediaWiki Wikistories extension: 1.46, 1.45, and 1.43.

  129. CVE-2026-103437 1.1 Faible

    The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki ReadingLists extension

    Improper neutralization of Script-Related HTML tags in a web page (basic XSS) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki ReadingLists extension allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects MediaWiki ReadingLists extension: 1.46 and 1.45.

  130. CVE-2026-103399 5.3 Moyenne

    Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

    A flaw was found in SoupServer (libsoup). When an HTTP/1.x client sends a request with Expect: 100-continue and a request body, and SoupServer returns an early final (non-1xx) response before the body is read, the server neither drains the declared body bytes nor closes the connection. On a keep-alive connection, those leftover bytes are interpreted as a subsequent HTTP request. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can place a complete HTTP request in the body and cause SoupServer to process that smuggled request, leading to unintended request handling.

  131. CVE-2026-102397 6.5 Moyenne

    supsystic Ultimate Maps by Supsystic

    Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Ultimate Maps by Supsystic <= 1.5.5 versions.

  132. CVE-2026-102392 7.2 Élevée

    ThemeHigh Extra Product Options For WooCommerce | Custom Product Addons and Fields

    Shop manager PHP Object Injection in Extra Product Options For WooCommerce | Custom Product Addons and Fields <= 3.3.8 versions.

  133. CVE-2026-102391 7.1 Élevée

    jetmonsters JetFormBuilder

    Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in JetFormBuilder <= 3.6.5.4 versions.

  134. CVE-2026-102377 8.8 Élevée

    10Web Photo Gallery by 10Web

    Contributor PHP Object Injection in Photo Gallery by 10Web <= 1.8.46 versions.

  135. CVE-2026-102376 7.1 Élevée

    WPMU DEV Branda

    Subscriber Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Branda <= 3.4.32 versions.

  136. CVE-2026-102375 6.5 Moyenne

    Optimole

    Missing Authorization vulnerability in Optimole Optimole optimole-wp allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Optimole: from n/a through 4.2.14.

  137. CVE-2026-100512 9.8 Critique

    Hook & Filter Nested Pages

    Contributor PHP Object Injection in Nested Pages <= 3.3.2 versions.

  138. CVE-2026-100510 7.1 Élevée

    BoldGrid Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid

    Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid <= 1.27.14 versions.

  139. CVE-2026-75969 9.1 Critique

    PTZOptics Move 4K 12X · PTZOptics Move 4K 20X · PTZOptics Move 4K 30X · PTZOptics Link 4K 12X

    Missing authentication for critical function vulnerability for all PTZOptics cameras and the Firmware Upgrade Tool - Firmware Update modules. A missing authentication vulnerability in the firmware update mechanism of affected PTZOptics cameras allows an unauthenticated user to install modified firmware on the device without administrator credentials. This vulnerability allows attackers to upload modified firmware to the device without admin credentials. This issue affects: * Move 4K 12X before: 0.0.98 * Move 4K 20X before: 0.1.33 * Move 4K 30X before: 2.1.17 * Link 4K 12X before: 0.0.99 * Link 4K 20X before: 0.1.37 * Link 4K 30X before: 2.1.18 * Move SE 12X before: 9.1.66 * Move SE 20X before: 9.1.44 * Move SE 30X before: 9.1.46 * Studio 4K 12X before: 8.3.32 * Studio 4K 20X before: 8.3.32 * Studio SE 12X before: 8.3.32 * Studio SE 20X before: 8.3.32 * All Generation 2 cameras, including: PT12X-SDI-GY-G2, PT12X-SDI-WH-G2, PT12X-NDI-GY-G2, PT12X-NDI-WH-G2; PT12X-USB-GY-G2, PT12X-USB-WH-G2; PT20X-SDI-GY-G2, PT20X-SDI-WH-G2, PT20X-NDI-GY-G2, PT20X-NDI-WH-G2; PT20X-USB-GY-G2, PT20X-USB-WH-G2; PT30X-SDI-GY-G2, PT30X-SDI-WH-G2, PT30X-NDI-GY-G2, PT30X-NDI-WH-G2; PTVL-ZCAM, PTVL-NDI-ZCAM; PTEPTZ-ZCAM-G2, PTEPTZ-NDI-ZCAM-G2; PT12X-ZCAM, PT12X-NDI-ZCAM; PT20X-ZCAM, PT20X-NDI-ZCAM; Studio Pro - All versions * Upgrade Tool - All versions

  140. CVE-2026-62308 9.1 Critique

    Quenary tugtainer

    Tugtainer is a self-hosted app for automating updates of Docker containers. Prior to version 1.30.6, Tugtainer allows an authenticated user to make the backend server send outbound HTTP requests to arbitrary user-supplied URLs through the notification test endpoint. The /settings/test_notification endpoint accepts a urls field and passes it directly to Apprise without restricting protocols, hostnames, localhost addresses, private IP ranges, or cloud metadata addresses. This can be abused as an authenticated blind server-side request forgery (SSRF). This issue has been patched in version 1.30.6.

  141. CVE-2026-55494 9.8 Critique

    Quenary tugtainer

    Tugtainer is a self-hosted app for automating updates of Docker containers. Prior to version 1.30.4, Tugtainer Agent allows unauthenticated access to Docker management APIs when AGENT_SECRET is not configured. The Agent uses request signatures to protect its API routes. However, in agent/auth.py, the signature verification function returns successfully if Config.AGENT_SECRET is empty. This causes protected Agent APIs to become accessible without authentication. This issue has been patched in version 1.30.4.

  142. CVE-2026-55181 9.4 Critique

    Quenary tugtainer

    Tugtainer is a self-hosted app for automating updates of Docker containers. Prior to version 1.30.3, Tugtainer's OIDC authentication can still be initiated even when OIDC_ENABLED=false. The /auth/oidc/enabled endpoint correctly reports that OIDC is disabled. However, a direct request to /auth/oidc/login still starts the OIDC login flow, returns HTTP 302, sets an oidc_state cookie, and redirects the user to the configured OIDC authorization endpoint. This bypasses the intended OIDC disable switch. This issue has been patched in version 1.30.3.

  143. CVE-2026-55177 7.6 Élevée

    dfpc-coe CloudTAK

    CloudTAK is a browser-based Common Operating Picture and situational awareness tool compatible with TAK. Prior to version 13.10.0, every route in the ESRI helper family (api/routes/esri.ts) takes a fully attacker-controlled URL from the request (POST /api/esri body url, and the portal / server / layer query parameters on the GET /api/esri/* routes) and passes it into EsriBase / EsriProxyPortal / EsriProxyServer / EsriProxyLayer in api/lib/esri.ts, which fetch it with the bare fetch from @tak-ps/etl. No IP / DNS / hostname classification is applied at any point, so the destination is never validated against private, loopback, or link-local ranges. Any authenticated user (the routes only require Auth.is_auth(config, req, { anyResources: true }), i.e. any token, not an admin) can therefore make the CloudTAK server issue arbitrary outbound GET/POST requests to internal addresses such as the cloud instance-metadata service (169.254.169.254), loopback admin ports (127.0.0.1:<port>), and other hosts reachable only from inside the deployment VPC. This is a full-read SSRF, not blind: on success the upstream JSON body is returned to the caller via res.json(...), and on failure the upstream error string is reflected verbatim as ESRI Server Error: <message>. An attacker can read cloud metadata (and the temporary IAM credentials the instance role exposes), enumerate internal services, and exfiltrate their response bodies. The sniff() URL classifier provides no protection: it only pattern-matches the pathname (/rest, /arcgis/rest, /sharing/rest), so a URL like http://169.254.169.254/arcgis/rest or http://127.0.0.1:8500/rest passes sniff() and is fetched. This issue has been patched in version 13.10.0.

  144. CVE-2026-55176 9.0 Critique

    Soft-Machine-io security

    Soft Machine is a Virtual Machine–based agentic development environment / Cloud OS. In versions 0.2.247 and prior, two authentication helpers in /app/server.js — verifyContainerAuth() and authenticateWorkspaceHttp() — accept the global CONTAINER_SHARED_SECRET as a bearer token without verifying which workspace the caller belongs to. Because that secret is set identically on every container in the Fly app and is reachable from the user-facing process environment inside each workspace, any tenant can use it to authenticate to any other tenant's workspace API. The result is cross-workspace read, write, and destructive-restore primitives reachable from any paying customer's shell. The existing per-workspace token check (workspaceTokenMatches) protects the user-facing per-workspace token path, but the shared-secret bearer path bypasses it entirely. At time of publication, there are no publicly known patches.

  145. CVE-2026-46711 8.3 Élevée

    Soft-Machine-io security

    Soft Machine is a Virtual Machine–based agentic development environment / Cloud OS. In versions 0.2.247 and prior, the workspace HTTP service that listens on 0.0.0.0:8080 inside each sm-ws-* Fly Machine exposes endpoints (/health, /file/<path>, /archive/<dir>) without any authentication or origin check. Any host that can reach TCP/8080 on a workspace can read arbitrary files under that workspace's /workspace root and download whole project trees as tar archives. Because every workspace shares the same Fly private 6PN and resolves all peer addresses via the unauthenticated _instances.internal TXT record, every other sm-ws-* machine on the same Fly app/org is a reachable, unauthenticated attacker — the trust boundary (workspace owner ↔ everyone-else) is missing. At time of publication, there are no publicly known patches.

  146. CVE-2026-19553 7.6 Élevée

    Python Software Foundation CPython

    ssl.SSLContext.wrap_bio() didn't require the server_hostname argument to not be None if ssl.SSLContext.check_hostname was set. Due to a missing parameter check in SSLObject, if the server_hostname argument isn't supplied then hostname verification would be silently skipped. This defect could lead to programs where certificate hostname verification *appeared* to be succeeding with SSLContext.check_hostname = True and no ValueError being raised due to misconfiguration. If the program passes a server_hostname value that isn't an empty string or None to any of these APIs then certificate hostname verification proceeds as expected and the program is not affected by this vulnerability. Mitigating this vulnerability doesn't require updating Python or applying the patch. To mitigate, pass a valid non-None and non-empty server_hostname value to SSLContext.wrap_bio(), asyncio.create_connection(), or asyncio.loop.start_tls() and certificate hostname verification will proceed as expected. Upgrading to the latest version of Python or applying the patch only changes the behavior from silently skipping hostname verification to raising a ValueError, similar to SSLContext.wrap_socket(), when server_hostname isn't supplied.

  147. CVE-2026-19445 9.2 Critique

    Python Software Foundation CPython

    A remote, unauthenticated TLS client can make a server crash or call through a freed pointer if its sni_callback assigns a different context to SSLSocket.context (the documented way to select a certificate per server name) and nothing else keeps the original ssl.SSLContext alive. Typical cases are servers that create an SSLContext per connection or replace it while connections are open; servers that wrap their listening socket with it are not affected. Mitigation: keep a reference to every SSLContext that sets sni_callback for the lifetime of the server. TLS clients are not affected.

  148. CVE-2026-103444 1.1 Faible

    The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WikiForum extension

    Improper neutralization of Script-Related HTML tags in a web page (basic XSS) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WikiForum extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects MediaWiki WikiForum extension: master.

  149. CVE-2026-103443 1.1 Faible

    The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Collection (Book) extension

    Improper neutralization of Script-Related HTML tags in a web page (basic XSS) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Collection (Book) extension allows XSS Targeting Non-Script Elements. This issue affects MediaWiki Collection (Book) extension: 1.46, 1.45, and 1.43.

  150. CVE-2026-103241 7.5 Élevée

    vllm-project vLLM · Vllm vllm

    A flaw has been found in vllm-project vLLM up to 0.26.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file rust/src/parser/src/unified/gemma4.rs of the component Gemma4UnifiedParser. Executing a manipulation can lead to denial of service. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 0.29.1rc0 is able to resolve this issue. This patch is called 3439bad37e68ba9755a46f4f6b44a4aeaf1f60a9. Upgrading the affected component is advised.