Veille CVE

Jeudi 27 août 2026

228 CVE sur 567

  1. CVE-2026-74820 10.0 Critique

    ServiceNow AI Platform

    ServiceNow has remediated a SQL injection vulnerability that was identified in in the ServiceNow AI platform. This vulnerability could enable an unauthenticated user, in certain circumstances, to execute arbitrary SQL statements against the instance's underlying database and gain access to, or modify, instance data beyond what was intended.  ServiceNow deployed a security update to hosted instances and ServiceNow provided the update to our partners and self-hosted customers. We are not currently aware of malicious exploitation against ServiceNow instances.  We recommend customers promptly apply appropriate updates or upgrade to a patched release if they have not already done so.

  2. CVE-2026-6876 10.0 Critique

    ServiceNow AI Platform

    ServiceNow has remediated a sandbox escape security issue that was identified in the ServiceNow AI Platform. This security issue could allow an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code within the ServiceNow AI Platform, potentially leading to more access to the ServiceNow AI Platform than intended.  ServiceNow deployed a security update to hosted instances and ServiceNow provided the update to our partners and self-hosted customers. We are not currently aware of malicious exploitation against ServiceNow instances.  We recommend customers promptly apply appropriate updates or upgrade to a patched release if they have not already done so.

  3. CVE-2026-59313 9.8 Critique

    Spring Framework · Vmware spring framework

    Spring MVC applications using the functional web framework are vulnerable to stream corruption when using Server-Sent Events (SSE). Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49

  4. CVE-2026-59283 9.1 Critique

    Spring Framework · Vmware spring framework

    Applications that evaluate Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions using SimpleEvaluationContext may be vulnerable to a safety guard bypass when the SpEL expression compiler is active. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier

  5. CVE-2026-54687 9.8 Critique

    DangerBlack n8n-node-sqlite3

    n8n-nodes-sqlite3 is a node for operating a local SQLite database from n8n. Prior to 1.0.0, nodes/SqliteNode/v1/SqliteV1.node.ts exposes the db_path database file path as a node parameter that permits data expressions from upstream workflow input. A workflow author who maps untrusted input to db_path can allow a remote attacker to select which SQLite file the n8n process opens, enabling traversal outside the intended database location and potentially reading, creating, or overwriting files accessible to the process. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.0.

  6. CVE-2026-37072 9.8 Critique

    Veno File Manager Project Veno File Manager Project 4.4.9 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control in admin-head-updates.php.

  7. CVE-2026-37071 9.8 Critique

    Arbitrary File Rename Leading to Privilege Escalation in Actions::renameFile() function in Veno File Manager Project 4.4.9 allows an authenticated attacker with 'reanme' permission to take over the super administrator account via a specially crafted POST request to the affected endpoint renaming the application configuration file and triggering a rebuild of configuration and resetting super administrator credentials to default values.

  8. CVE-2026-37065 9.1 Critique

    Veno File Manager Project 4.4.9 is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Deletion in /vfm-admin/index.php?section=translations&action=update&remove=.

  9. CVE-2026-37007 9.8 Critique

    A vulnerability in FileWriterTool in crewai-tools <= 1.10.2rc1 allows a remote attacker to achieve code execution via malicious path traversal sequences in the filename argument.

  10. CVE-2026-37006 9.8 Critique

    A vulnerability in the WebSocket endpoint of gpt-researcher v0.14.7 and before allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to achieve code execution via malicious Model Context Protocol configurations.

  11. CVE-2026-37004 9.8 Critique

    BerriAI litellm <=1.82.4 is vulnerable to Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI), which allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via a crafted dotprompt_content parameter in the /prompts/test endpoint due to use of an unsandboxed jinja2.Environment.

  12. CVE-2026-37003 9.8 Critique

    Agno up to and including 2.5.8 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via prompt injection. The PythonTools and ShellTools components pass unsanitized, LLM-generated arguments directly to execution sinks including exec(), runpy.run_path(), and subprocess.run(). An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this by embedding malicious instructions in content processed by the agent (such as web pages or documents), allowing for arbitrary code and OS command execution on the host server.

  13. CVE-2026-35869 9.8 Critique

    A Command Injection vulnerability exists in the bs_SetLimitCli_info function within the libshare.so library of LB-link Router AC450M V4.0.0. This flaw occurs due to insufficient validation and sanitization of user-supplied input before it is passed to a system-level command execution context. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by injecting specially crafted shell metacharacters or payloads into the vulnerable parameter, resulting in the execution of arbitrary operating system commands.

  14. CVE-2026-35868 9.8 Critique

    A Command Injection vulnerability exists in the bs_SetLimitCli_info function within the libshare.so library of LB-link Router AC2100_AZ3 V1.0.4. This flaw occurs due to insufficient validation and sanitization of user-supplied input before it is passed to a system-level command execution context. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by injecting specially crafted shell metacharacters or payloads into the vulnerable parameter, resulting in the execution of arbitrary operating system commands.

  15. CVE-2026-30612 9.8 Critique

    An issue in Time4 Popcorn for Windows <= 6.2.1.18 and Time4Popcorn for MacOS <= 6.2.1.17 and Time4Popcorn for Android <= 3.5.0.173 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the updater.exe for windows, PT.updd on MacOS components

  16. CVE-2026-19092 9.8 Critique

    Unknown Tutor LMS

    The Tutor LMS WordPress plugin before 4.0.6 does not prevent request data from overwriting internal variables while rendering templates, allowing unauthenticated users to invoke arbitrary zero-argument PHP functions and receive their output.

  17. CVE-2026-18886 10.0 Critique

    ServiceNow AI Platform

    ServiceNow has remediated an improper access control vulnerability that was identified in the ServiceNow AI platform. This vulnerability could enable an unauthenticated user, in certain circumstances, to create or modify instance data beyond what was intended, resulting in privilege escalation.  ServiceNow deployed a security update to hosted instances and ServiceNow provided the update to our partners and self-hosted customers. We are not currently aware of exploitation against ServiceNow instances.  We recommend customers promptly apply appropriate updates or upgrade to a patched release if they have not already done so.

  18. CVE-2026-18885 10.0 Critique

    ServiceNow AI Platform

    ServiceNow has remediated a code injection vulnerability that was identified in the ServiceNow AI platform. This vulnerability could enable an unauthenticated user, in certain circumstances, to execute arbitrary code in the ServiceNow platform and gain access to, or modify, instance data beyond what was intended.  ServiceNow deployed a security update to hosted instances and ServiceNow provided the update to our partners and self-hosted customers. We are not currently aware of malicious exploitation against ServiceNow instances.  We recommend customers promptly apply appropriate updates or upgrade to a patched release if they have not already done so.

  19. CVE-2026-81826 9.1 Critique

    flowintel

    Affected versions of Flowintel do not revoke existing authenticated sessions when a user’s password is changed. This means that if an attacker already possesses a valid session—for example, from prior access or a stolen session token—the victim changing their password does not terminate that attacker’s access. The session remains usable until it expires naturally. The upstream commit describes this directly as: “session keeps working until it expires.” The fix detects password changes and explicitly invokes _invalidate_user_sessions(user.id) after the database update. This is applied in both edit_user_core() and admin_edit_user_core(). Version impacted >=3.3.0

  20. CVE-2026-81735 10.0 Critique

    bytedance UI-TARS-desktop

    startServer.ts in the mcp-http-server package of UI-TARS-desktop defaulted its listen address to '::' when no host was given, so startSseAndStreamableHttpMcpServer bound the Streamable HTTP and SSE MCP transports to every interface, and its authentication middleware was optional: middlewares are applied only when a caller supplies them. The @agent-infra/mcp-server-commands and @agent-infra/mcp-server-filesystem entry points call startSseAndStreamableHttpMcpServer with a host and port alone and pass no middleware, so neither server required a credential. The commands server exposes a run_command tool that hands its caller-supplied command string to promisify(child_process.exec), so any unauthenticated client able to reach the port could run arbitrary commands as the user running the server, and the filesystem server exposed its file read and write tools on the same terms. The listen default became 127.0.0.1 in commit c2ad42e3eb9b27830db41a3e6f51ca7179d9b168; the package version stayed at 1.2.4 across that change, so the boundary is the commit rather than a release.

  21. CVE-2026-81707 9.8 Critique

    jahlives openssl_encrypt

    openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 fails to sanitize the email field of imported identity documents, allowing attackers to inject ANSI escape sequences that forge the fingerprint verification line displayed to users. Attackers can deliver a crafted identity bundle through normal contact-exchange flows or keyserver responses to manipulate terminal output and display a fraudulent fingerprint, bypassing the out-of-band verification mechanism that protects against key substitution attacks.

  22. CVE-2026-81702 9.8 Critique

    jahlives openssl_encrypt · Jahlives openssl encrypt

    openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 fails to re-derive and validate fingerprints when loading identities from identity.json, allowing attackers to substitute public keys in identity stores. Attackers can replace legitimate public keys with their own while maintaining the claimed fingerprint, enabling silent key substitution where encryption uses attacker keys and signature verification appears valid.

  23. CVE-2026-81701 9.8 Critique

    jahlives openssl_encrypt · Jahlives openssl encrypt

    openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 use a denylist to identify trusted built-in plugins, allowing unsigned plugins in top-level plugins/ directories and unknown subdirectories to bypass signature verification. Attackers can place malicious unsigned plugins following documented installation paths to achieve arbitrary code execution in the CLI process with access to passwords and cryptographic keys.

  24. CVE-2026-81700 9.8 Critique

    jahlives openssl_encrypt · Jahlives openssl encrypt

    openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 contain a signature verification vulnerability in gpg_runner.verify_detached that accepts revoked and expired keys by only checking VALIDSIG status without inspecting REVKEYSIG, EXPKEYSIG, or gpg exit codes. Attackers holding compromised-then-revoked signing keys or expired project keys can bypass signature verification to execute malicious plugins in the host process.

  25. CVE-2026-81098 9.1 Critique

    team-telnyx telnyx-mcp

    The Telnyx MCP server exposed its HTTP transport on every interface and did not require a caller credential. packages/mcp-server/src/http.ts served MCP on the root path with a listener bound to all interfaces and parsed the caller's authentication headers in a mode that did not fail when they were absent, so a request without any credential completed initialisation and dispatched tools. Dispatch forwarded the server's own stored credentials, the Telnyx API key and client secret together with the code-execution key, to the upstream endpoint, so an unauthenticated caller able to reach the port acted with them. The current code defaults the host to loopback, requires a server API key, and enforces it in middleware.

  26. CVE-2026-81096 10.0 Critique

    mims-harvard ToolUniverse

    ToolUniverse ran caller-supplied Python inside a sandbox that could be escaped, on a server that required no authentication. The executor behind the python_code_executor tool, in python_executor_tool.py, inspected the submitted source for a denied list of attribute names and calls but left the attribute-lookup builtins available and did not stop a dunder attribute reached through a string lookup or through a module already permitted, so a caller could walk from a literal's class to its base and enumerate subclasses to obtain a reference to the process and subprocess modules. A per-call argument also let the caller widen the import allow-list before the inspection ran. The HTTP and MCP servers in http_api_server.py and smcp_server.py bound to every interface with debugging enabled and no authentication, so any caller able to reach the port executed code as the server process. Version 1.3.0 adds bearer-token authentication, defaults the bind address to loopback, and hardens the attribute checks.

  27. CVE-2026-81094 9.1 Critique

    mcp-router

    The mcp-router CLI served its MCP aggregator on every interface and enforced authentication only when the operator asked for it. The serve command in apps/cli/src/commands/serve.ts defaulted its host to the all-interfaces address on a fixed port, and required a token only when the corresponding flag was supplied, so a default invocation exposed the aggregator, and every MCP server it fronted, to anyone able to reach the port. Release 0.6.3 defaults the host to the loopback address and refuses to start without a token whenever the host it is given is not a loopback address; no earlier release carries either check.

  28. CVE-2026-78251 9.3 Critique

    DJI Neo · DJI Neo 2 · DJI Flip · DJI Air 3

    DJI drones contain an FTP service that uses hardcoded credentials shared across affected models and permits authenticated users to upload files without limits on file size, file count, or total storage consumed in **/blackbox/upgrade/**, as well as overwrite existing files in that directory. An attacker with access to the drone's internal network or USB RNDIS interface can exhaust the available storage, preventing the aircraft from writing flight records, logs, and telemetry and potentially preventing subsequent firmware updates. Uploaded files persist across reboot and factory reset. Affected models are DJI Neo until 01.00.0400, DJI Neo 2 until 01.00.0500, DJI Flip until 01.00.1200, DJI Air 3 until 01.00.1600, DJI Air 3S until 01.00.1400, DJI Avata 2 until 01.00.0400, DJI Avata 360 until 01.00.0300, DJI Mavic 3 until 01.00.1400, DJI Mavic 3 Classic until 01.00.0800, DJI Mavic 3 Pro until 01.01.0700, DJI Mavic 4 Pro until 01.00.0500, DJI Mini 2 until 01.07.0200, DJI Mini 3 until 01.00.0500, DJI Mini 3 Pro until 01.00.0900, DJI Mini 4 Pro until 01.00.1100, and DJI Mini 5 Pro until 01.00.0600. Remediation requires a firmware update from the vendor.

  29. CVE-2026-75871 9.6 Critique

    GitLab AI Gateway · Gitlab gitlab

    GitLab has remediated a vulnerability in the GitLab AI Gateway component affecting all versions of the AI Gateway from 18.10 to 19.0.12, 19.1 to 19.1.7, and 19.2 to 19.2.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user with Duo Agent Platform access to redirect outbound model requests to an externally-controlled endpoint via a crafted inline flow configuration that overrides the HTTP Host header, resulting in disclosure of Google Cloud Vertex cloud service credentials and private signing keys.

  30. CVE-2026-75357 9.8 Critique

    An issue in Bilibili Desktop v.1.17.9 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the bili-inject.js and bili-bridge.js components.

  31. CVE-2026-57499 9.1 Critique

    limanmys core

    Liman is open source server management software. Prior to 2.2.2 - 1103, an OS command injection vulnerability in the log rotation configuration endpoint allows an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the Liman server. The `ip_address` parameter is embedded directly into a shell command without sanitization, enabling shell escape via single-quote injection. This is fixed in 2.2.2 - 1103.

  32. CVE-2026-26897 9.8 Critique

    An issue in EcoOnline EHS (com.airsweb.v10) application for Android, version 0.2.499 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via the AndroidManifest.xml component

  33. CVE-2026-16279 9.3 Critique

    Dassault Systèmes 3DSwymer

    An Improper Authorization vulnerability affecting 3DPassport in 3DSwymer from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2023x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2026x could allow an attacker to gain access to some user accounts.

  34. CVE-2023-49720 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  35. CVE-2023-49605 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  36. CVE-2023-49601 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  37. CVE-2023-49592 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  38. CVE-2023-49116 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  39. CVE-2023-48370 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  40. CVE-2023-48337 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  41. CVE-2023-47214 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  42. CVE-2023-47208 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  43. CVE-2023-47206 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  44. CVE-2023-47205 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  45. CVE-2023-47176 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  46. CVE-2023-46710 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  47. CVE-2023-46709 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  48. CVE-2023-46703 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  49. CVE-2023-46702 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  50. CVE-2023-46684 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  51. CVE-2023-46101 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  52. CVE-2023-45848 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  53. CVE-2023-45739 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  54. CVE-2023-45313 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  55. CVE-2023-45216 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  56. CVE-2023-45214 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  57. CVE-2023-45211 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  58. CVE-2023-43759 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  59. CVE-2023-43613 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  60. CVE-2023-43607 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  61. CVE-2023-43486 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  62. CVE-2023-43483 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  63. CVE-2023-42779 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  64. CVE-2023-42778 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  65. CVE-2023-42777 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  66. CVE-2023-42767 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  67. CVE-2023-42434 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  68. CVE-2023-42432 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  69. CVE-2023-42430 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  70. CVE-2023-41959 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  71. CVE-2023-41371 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  72. CVE-2023-41370 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  73. CVE-2023-41087 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  74. CVE-2023-41083 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  75. CVE-2023-40746 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  76. CVE-2023-40538 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  77. CVE-2023-40157 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  78. CVE-2023-40149 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  79. CVE-2023-40147 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  80. CVE-2023-39942 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  81. CVE-2023-39940 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  82. CVE-2023-39931 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  83. CVE-2023-39449 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  84. CVE-2023-39430 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  85. CVE-2023-39426 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  86. CVE-2023-39232 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  87. CVE-2023-39229 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  88. CVE-2023-39225 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  89. CVE-2023-38656 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  90. CVE-2023-38578 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  91. CVE-2023-38577 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  92. CVE-2023-38567 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  93. CVE-2023-38540 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  94. CVE-2023-38539 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  95. CVE-2023-38260 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  96. CVE-2023-38134 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  97. CVE-2023-36863 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  98. CVE-2023-36856 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  99. CVE-2023-36855 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  100. CVE-2023-36852 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  101. CVE-2023-36491 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  102. CVE-2023-35988 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  103. CVE-2023-35771 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  104. CVE-2023-35770 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  105. CVE-2023-35768 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  106. CVE-2023-35766 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  107. CVE-2023-35761 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  108. CVE-2023-35190 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  109. CVE-2023-35135 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  110. CVE-2023-35125 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  111. CVE-2023-35122 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  112. CVE-2023-35063 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  113. CVE-2023-35059 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  114. CVE-2023-35058 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  115. CVE-2023-35000 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  116. CVE-2023-34996 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  117. CVE-2023-34428 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  118. CVE-2023-34393 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  119. CVE-2023-34313 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  120. CVE-2023-34084 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  121. CVE-2023-32733 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  122. CVE-2023-32648 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  123. CVE-2023-32640 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  124. CVE-2023-32631 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  125. CVE-2023-32630 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  126. CVE-2023-32287 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  127. CVE-2023-32286 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  128. CVE-2023-31270 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  129. CVE-2023-31249 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  130. CVE-2023-31243 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  131. CVE-2023-31202 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  132. CVE-2023-31201 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  133. CVE-2023-30761 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  134. CVE-2023-29496 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  135. CVE-2023-28825 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  136. CVE-2023-28822 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  137. CVE-2023-28721 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  138. CVE-2023-28719 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  139. CVE-2023-28717 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  140. CVE-2023-28403 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  141. CVE-2023-27924 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  142. CVE-2023-27885 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  143. CVE-2023-27884 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  144. CVE-2023-27883 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  145. CVE-2023-27880 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  146. CVE-2023-27528 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  147. CVE-2023-27511 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  148. CVE-2023-27393 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  149. CVE-2023-27381 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused

  150. CVE-2023-27302 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused