Veille CVE

Jeudi 20 août 2026

34 CVE sur 513

  1. CVE-2026-70652 2.0 Faible

    libvips

    libvips is a fast image processing library with low memory needs. Prior to version 8.18.3, libvips built with libultrahdr support can incorrectly size an output buffer in libvips/foreign/uhdrsave.c within vips_foreign_save_uhdr_set_raw_hdr when a pipeline enlarges an incoming JPEG to a very large output before encoding a gain map through VipsForeignSaveUhdr. The undersized allocation can cause a heap buffer over-read that may disclose adjacent data or crash the process. This issue is fixed in version 8.18.3.

  2. CVE-2026-77151 3.7 Faible

    lin-snow Ech0

    A security flaw has been discovered in lin-snow Ech0 up to 5.4.1. Affected by this issue is the function MD5Encrypt of the file internal/util/crypto/crypto.go. Performing a manipulation results in risky cryptographic algorithm. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. Upgrading to version 5.4.2 can resolve this issue. The patch is named 9ce19a3b0d0765086a655f45d3a706ec1810404f. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

  3. CVE-2026-63723 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  4. CVE-2026-8717 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  5. CVE-2026-6822 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  6. CVE-2026-6260 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  7. CVE-2026-53993 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  8. CVE-2026-49996 3.7 Faible

    freedomofpress securedrop-client

    SecureDrop Client is a desktop app for journalists to securely communicate with sources and handle submissions on the SecureDrop Workstation. Prior to version 1.3.1, a malicious SecureDrop Server could bypass securedrop-proxy's origin limitation by responding with cross-origin redirects. SecureDrop Server itself has multiple layers of built-in hardening, and is a dedicated physical machine exposed on the internet only via Tor hidden services for the Source and Journalist interfaces, and optionally via remote SSH access over another Tor hidden service. A newsroom's SecureDrop Workstation communicates only with its own dedicated SecureDrop Server. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

  9. CVE-2026-46537 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  10. CVE-2026-46536 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  11. CVE-2026-46535 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  12. CVE-2026-46534 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  13. CVE-2026-46533 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  14. CVE-2026-72845 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  15. CVE-2026-64846 2.8 Faible

    NixOS nix

    Nix is a package manager for Linux and other Unix systems. Prior to 2.35.0, a malicious derivation executed with the recursive-nix experimental feature can exploit a time-of-check/time-of-use race involving final symlink handling in the LocalStore restore path. The race can cause writeFile to follow a substituted final symlink when opening a path with O_TRUNC instead of enforcing FinalSymlink::DontFollow, allowing the Nix process or nix-daemon to create or truncate an empty file outside the build sandbox with the daemon user's permissions. The primitive does not provide arbitrary-content writes and requires winning the race. This issue is fixed in version 2.35.0.

  16. CVE-2026-18283 2.4 Faible

    Sony XAV-9500ES

    Sony XAV-9500ES udev USB Rules Authorization Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to bypass authorization on affected installations on Sony XAV-9500ES devices. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the udev rules. A crafted USB device connected to the system can trigger instantiation of otherwise restricted USB device types. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authorization on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-28992.

  17. CVE-2026-18280 3.9 Faible

    Sony XAV-9500ES

    Sony XAV-9500ES gpsd Buffer Overflow Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Sony XAV-9500ES devices. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of NMEA data by the gpsd daemon. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length buffer. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the gpsd daemon. Was ZDI-CAN-29060.

  18. CVE-2026-18278 3.5 Faible

    Sony XAV-9500ES

    Sony XAV-9500ES prh_l2_decode_packet Out-Of-Bounds Read Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Sony XAV-9500ES devices. An attacker must first obtain the ability to pair a malicious Bluetooth device with the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Bluetooth L2CAP packets. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-28990.

  19. CVE-2026-76632 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  20. CVE-2026-64963 2.3 Faible

    ATutor

    A path traversal vulnerability in ATutor allows an authenticated user to access files from other course directories when the AT_FORCE_GET_FILE configuration option is enabled. This can lead to unauthorized access to files and disclosure of information about the filesystem structure. Product is no longer actively supported and the vulnerabilities have not been fixed. Only version 2.2.4 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested but might also be vulnerable.

  21. CVE-2026-7485 2.3 Faible

    Checkmk GmbH Checkmk

    Incorrect authorization in frozen BI aggregations in Checkmk <2.5.0p2, <2.4.0p29, <2.3.0p47, and all 2.2.0 versions allows an authenticated user with restricted host and service visibility to learn the names and the existence of hosts and services they are not authorized to see.

  22. CVE-2026-73542 3.7 Faible

    SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION Multiple SEIKO EPSON printers and scanners

    Multiple SEIKO EPSON printers and scanners contain revoked root certificates. A man-in-the-middle attack may allow an attacker to obtain communication data transmitted by the product. As for the details of the affected products and versions, refer to the vendor's information.

  23. CVE-2026-19699 2.7 Faible

    Unknown GutenKit

    The GutenKit WordPress plugin before 2.5.0 does not have a sufficient capability check on some of its REST API endpoints, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to retrieve mailing-list audience metadata from the site's connected marketing account.

  24. CVE-2026-19582 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: Red Hat Product Security has come to the conclusion that this CVE is false due to upstream security policy.

  25. CVE-2026-19563 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  26. CVE-2026-19562 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  27. CVE-2026-19561 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  28. CVE-2026-18862 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  29. CVE-2026-18502 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  30. CVE-2026-76371 2.7 Faible

    Splunk FireAMP

    In FireAMP versions below 2.1.15, a user who holds a role that can edit, create, or run playbooks in Splunk SOAR could run the add listitem action in a Safe Mode playbook while that action is listed as read-only, which could allow for unauthorized changes to file lists. The vulnerability is possible because the FireAMP connector action manifest classifies the add listitem action as read-only even though the action updates file lists. For more information see Manage settings for a playbook in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-cloud/build-playbooks/manage-playbooks-and-playbook-settings/manage-settings-for-a-playbook-in-splunk-soar-cloud) in the Splunk documentation.

  31. CVE-2026-76369 2.7 Faible

    Splunk SOAR

    In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.6.0, a user who holds the OnPrem Broker role could write files outside the intended Automation Broker log directory. The vulnerability is possible because Automation Broker log uploads accept crafted filename input before writing log files. For more information see Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (Cloud) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-cloud/administer-soar-cloud/manage-your-splunk-soar-cloud-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-cloud) and About Splunk SOAR Automation Broker (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/splunk-automation-broker/about-splunk-soar-automation-broker/about-splunk-soar-automation-broker) in the Splunk documentation.

  32. CVE-2026-76368 2.7 Faible

    Splunk SOAR

    In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.6.0, a user who holds a role that contains the playbooks:view permission could view metadata about a playbook repository that they are not authorized to view. The vulnerability is possible because Playbook History does not check repository permissions before returning playbook revision metadata. For more information see Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (Cloud) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-cloud/administer-soar-cloud/manage-your-splunk-soar-cloud-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-cloud) and Manage settings for a playbook in Splunk SOAR (Cloud) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-cloud/build-playbooks/manage-playbooks-and-playbook-settings/manage-settings-for-a-playbook-in-splunk-soar-cloud) in the Splunk documentation.

  33. CVE-2026-76361 2.7 Faible

    Splunk SOAR

    In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.6.0, a user with the "Administrator" role could use the /rest/support/connectivity/.../check_connectivity endpoint to make Splunk SOAR initiate outbound network connections to arbitrary destinations and determine whether internal hosts and ports are reachable. The Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) is possible because the connectivity check REST API does not sufficiently validate the destination before Splunk SOAR connects to it. For more information see Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/8.5.0/manage-your-splunk-soar-on-premises-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-on-premises) in the Splunk documentation.

  34. CVE-2026-76348 3.8 Faible

    Splunk Enterprise · Splunk splunk

    In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who holds a Splunk role that contains the high-privilege list_search_head_clustering capability could send a read request to Search Head Cluster member control endpoints and change cluster state, which could allow for a denial of service. The vulnerability is possible because the Search Head Cluster member control endpoints do not require a state-changing Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) request type before they apply read-only authorization.