Veille CVE

Vendredi 7 août 2026

77 CVE sur 427

  1. CVE-2026-70624 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  2. CVE-2026-70623 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  3. CVE-2026-50540 9.6 Critique

    kata-containers

    Kata Containers is an open source project focusing on a standard implementation of lightweight Virtual Machines (VMs) that perform like containers. Prior to version 4.0.0, kata-runtime is vulnerable to host code execution via an unvalidated configuration path annotation. The runtime accepts an arbitrary io.katacontainers.config_path pod annotation and loads the referenced host TOML file without restriction. As a result, a pod user who can place a file at a host-visible path can supply a configuration that selects an attacker-controlled hypervisor or virtio-fs daemon binary, executing code as root on the host. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.0.

  4. CVE-2026-61808 9.8 Critique

    HKUDS LightRAG

    LightRAG provides simple and fast retrieval-augmented generation. Through version 1.5.4, the LightRAG API server binds to all network interfaces with authentication disabled by default, allowing an unauthenticated network attacker to read indexed document content, upload or delete documents, modify the knowledge graph, cancel pipelines, clear caches, and consume LLM resources. This issue is mitigated in version 1.5.5rc1.

  5. CVE-2026-48039 9.1 Critique

    pipeboard-co meta-ads-mcp

    Meta Ads MCP is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets AI assistants run Meta Ads. Prior to version 1.0.109, `AuthInjectionMiddleware.dispatch()` at `http_auth_integration.py:272` unconditionally forwards unauthenticated Streamable HTTP requests to downstream MCP tool handlers without issuing a `401` response, allowing any network-reachable caller to invoke MCP tools without authentication. When no per-request credential is present, tool handlers fall back to the `META_ACCESS_TOKEN` environment variable, and when the downstream Meta Graph API call fails, `api.py:263–269` serialises the raw `httpx` request URL—including the operator's `access_token` as a query parameter—into the JSON-RPC response body, delivering the credential to the unauthenticated caller. Version 1.0.109 fixes the issue.

  6. CVE-2026-71851 9.0 Critique

    brix crypto-js

    crypto-js is a JavaScript library of crypto standards. Versions of crypto-js prior to 4.0.0 generate randomness in CryptoJS.lib.WordArray.random() using a custom variation of the Multiply-With-Carry pseudorandom number generator, seeded from Math.random(), instead of a cryptographically secure source. This generator was introduced in version 3.1.2-4 and remained present in nearly every 3.x release. Nominal requests for 128 or 256 bits of entropy through this function produce effective search spaces of approximately 2 to the 39th and 2 to the 47th possibilities, small enough to enumerate on commodity hardware. Downstream wallet applications that used CryptoJS.lib.WordArray.random() as the entropy source for BIP39 recovery phrases are affected, and an attacker who enumerates the reduced output space can recover the resulting private keys and control the associated funds. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.0.

  7. CVE-2026-64637 9.9 Critique

    WebPros Plesk

    Improper privilege management in the XML-RPC API of Plesk before 18.0.80, allows an authenticated reseller to obtain an administrative session for the root user account.

  8. CVE-2026-19264 9.8 Critique

    gitroomhq postiz-app

    Postiz is an open-source social media scheduling tool. The route that serves locally stored media joins URL-supplied path segments onto the upload directory and streams the file without normalising the path or confining it to that directory, and the route requires no authentication. Raw dot-segments are collapsed before routing, but URL-encoded separators survive route matching and are decoded only once they reach the handler, restoring the traversal at the filesystem call. An unauthenticated remote attacker can therefore read any file readable by the application process, including the process environment, which exposes the JWT signing secret, the database connection string, and connected provider and billing secrets. Because session tokens are signed with that secret and carry no expiry, this allows forging a non-expiring session as any user, including an administrator, without a password.

  9. CVE-2022-4995 9.8 Critique

    Weaver Network Co., Ltd. E-cology 9.0

    Weaver (Fanwei) E-cology 9.0 versions prior to 10.52 contain a file upload vulnerability that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary files, including JSP webshells, by submitting a multipart/form-data POST request to /workrelate/plan/util/uploaderOperate.jsp with arbitrary secId and plandetailid field values. Successful exploitation results in remote code execution under the privileges of the application server process. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2023-10-14 (UTC).

  10. CVE-2026-66914 9.2 Critique

    seblod.com SEBLOD extension for Joomla

    Joomla Extension - seblod.com - Unauthenticated path traversal in SEBLOD < 3.30.0, < 4.7.0, < 6.0.1 - An unauthenticated attacker could download files from both inside and outside the webroot.

  11. CVE-2026-56793 9.8 Critique

    Dell OpenManage Server Administrator Managed Node (Patch) for Windows · Dell OpenManage Server Administrator Managed Node for RHEL 8.10 · Dell OpenManage Server Administrator Managed Node for RHEL 9.4 · Dell OpenManage Server Administrator Managed Node for SLES 15

    Dell OpenManage Server Administrator, versions prior to 11.1.0.2, contains an Improper Authentication vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access.

  12. CVE-2026-71560 9.1 Critique

    Apache Software Foundation Apache Fory · Apache fory

    Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in Apache Fory C++ deserialization. This issue affects Apache Fory C++ versions from 0.14.0 before 1.5.0 when deserializing structs containing tagged integer fields. A crafted input payload may trigger an out-of-bounds heap read in the tagged integer fast-path deserializer, potentially causing information disclosure or denial of service. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Fory 1.5.0, which fixes this issue. Applications that do not use Apache Fory C++ or do not use tagged integer fields are not affected.

  13. CVE-2026-71558 9.8 Critique

    Apache Software Foundation Apache Fory · Apache fory

    Heap type confusion vulnerability in Apache Fory C++ deserialization. This issue affects Apache Fory C++ versions from 0.14.0 before 1.5.0. A crafted input payload can bypass type compatibility checks during polymorphic smart-pointer deserialization, causing an object of an incompatible type to be treated as the declared base type. This may result in undefined behavior and potentially lead to denial of service or arbitrary code execution. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Fory 1.5.0, which fixes this issue. Applications not using Apache Fory C++ polymorphic smart-pointer deserialization are not affected.

  14. CVE-2026-54213 9.2 Critique

    Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid

    Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox application exposes a functionality that allows the server to be shut down when a specific endpoint (/internalRestart) is accessed. This endpoint is accessible to unauthenticated users over the public Internet. Instead of “restarting”, the server shuts completely down. As a result, a remote attacker can trigger a persistent denial of service by shutting down the web server without requiring authentication. Recovery requires manual administrator intervention to restart the service. This issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528. Starting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality.

  15. CVE-2026-54212 9.5 Critique

    Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid

    Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox application implements an API endpoint that is vulnerable to a buffer overflow condition. By submitting a specially crafted JSON body, such as one that is at least 8 characters long and begins with a number, an unauthenticated attacker can cause the server to crash, resulting in denial of service. Depending on the stack state or if a stack canary can be disclosed through another vulnerability, this buffer overflow could potentially lead to remote code execution and full compromise of the server. This issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528. Starting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality.

  16. CVE-2026-54211 9.5 Critique

    Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid

    Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox application’s endpoint “//serverClient_close.html” is vulnerable to a buffer overflow vulnerability in multiple form data parameters. By submitting excessively long values in these parameters, an authenticated attacker can trigger a server crash, resulting in denial of service. Depending on the stack state or if a stack canary can be disclosed through another vulnerability, this buffer overflow could potentially be exploited for remote code execution, leading to full compromise of the server. This issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528. Starting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality.

  17. CVE-2026-54210 9.5 Critique

    Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid

    Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox application implements various file upload functionalities that are vulnerable to a buffer overflow condition. By specifying an excessively long filename in a file upload request, an unauthenticated attacker can trigger a crash of the server, resulting in a denial of service. Depending on the stack state or if a stack canary can be disclosed through another vulnerability, this buffer overflow could potentially be exploited for remote code execution, leading to full compromise of the server. This issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528. Starting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality.

  18. CVE-2026-54203 9.2 Critique

    Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid

    Memory Leak to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox allows reading of sensitive information. When accessing the URL “/.well-known/mta-sts.”, the application responds with memory. By repeatedly requesting this endpoint, an attacker can access sensitive information, including user passwords. Exploitation does not require authentication. This issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528. Starting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality.

  19. CVE-2026-16258 9.8 Critique

    Unknown Ajax Search Lite

    The Ajax Search Lite WordPress plugin before 4.14.5 does not prevent the deserialization of untrusted input, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform PHP Object Injection. When a suitable POP chain is present via another installed Ajax Search Lite WordPress plugin before 4.14.5 or , this can be leveraged to achieve Remote Code Execution.

  20. CVE-2026-16038 9.1 Critique

    Unknown MStore API

    The MStore API WordPress plugin before 4.21.0 does not verify the payment with the payment gateway before marking an order as paid on several of its payment-completion endpoints, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to mark an arbitrary order fully paid without paying and obtain goods or services for free.

  21. CVE-2026-14205 9.8 Critique

    Unknown WP Events Manager

    The WP Events Manager WordPress plugin before 2.2.5 does not validate the requested quantity when registering for a paid event and computes the price from the attacker-controlled quantity, allowing any authenticated user to create a completed booking for a paid event without making a payment.

  22. CVE-2026-14365 9.8 Critique

    themetechmount TrueBooker – Appointment Booking and Scheduler System

    The TrueBooker – Appointment Booking and Scheduler System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.3. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the password of arbitrary user accounts, including administrators, which can be leveraged to gain access to those accounts.

  23. CVE-2026-14364 9.8 Critique

    themetechmount TrueBooker – Appointment Booking and Scheduler System

    The TrueBooker – Appointment Booking and Scheduler System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to account takeover via improper password reset validation in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.3. This is due to the plugin not properly validating a user's identity before resetting their password. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the password of arbitrary user accounts, including administrators, and gain access to those accounts.

  24. CVE-2026-70332 9.6 Critique

    Microsoft SharePoint Online

    Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

  25. CVE-2026-68823 9.1 Critique

    Microsoft Azure Confidential Ledger

    Exposed dangerous method or function in Azure Confidential Ledger allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

  26. CVE-2026-65667 10.0 Critique

    Microsoft Teams

    Missing authorization in Microsoft Teams allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

  27. CVE-2026-63508 10.0 Critique

    Microsoft Planetary Computer Pro (GeoCatalog) · Microsoft planetary computer

    Missing authentication for critical function in Microsoft Planetary Computer Pro allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

  28. CVE-2026-62896 9.6 Critique

    Microsoft Teams

    Improper authentication in Microsoft Teams allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

  29. CVE-2026-62873 9.8 Critique

    Microsoft 365 Admin Center · Microsoft windows admin center

    Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Microsoft 365 Admin Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

  30. CVE-2026-62836 10.0 Critique

    Microsoft Azure SQL Managed Instance

    Improper restriction of communication channel to intended endpoints in Azure SQL Managed Instance allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

  31. CVE-2026-62830 9.9 Critique

    Microsoft Azure SRE Agent

    Missing authorization in Azure SRE Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

  32. CVE-2026-59118 9.3 Critique

    Microsoft Copilot Cowork · Microsoft power apps

    Improper authorization in Copilot Cowork allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

  33. CVE-2026-59115 9.9 Critique

    Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service

    '.../...//' in Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service (SyncFabric) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

  34. CVE-2026-56162 10.0 Critique

    Microsoft Azure SQL Database

    Improper authentication in Azure SQL Database allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

  35. CVE-2026-56161 9.6 Critique

    Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

    Improper access control in Azure Logic Apps allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

  36. CVE-2026-50515 9.9 Critique

    Microsoft Azure Service Bus

    Deserialization of untrusted data in Azure Service Bus allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

  37. CVE-2026-50481 9.9 Critique

    Microsoft Azure Active Directory

    Modification of assumed-immutable data (maid) in Azure Active Directory allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

  38. CVE-2026-15805 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

  39. CVE-2026-71324 9.1 Critique

    traefik · Traefik traefik

    Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9, Traefik's default HTTP reverse proxy forwards a plain HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 CONNECT request and its body to an HTTP/1.1 upstream through a shared net/http.Transport. When the upstream answers the CONNECT with a keep-alive non-2xx response and does not drain the body, Traefik returns the desynchronized backend socket to its shared pool and reuses it for other clients. An unauthenticated attacker can use this behavior to make a different client read the attacker's smuggled response, which can include authenticated or private content from another request. The ForwardAuth middleware with forwardBody true and preserveRequestMethod true can re-issue a CONNECT with the buffered body attached, exposing the auth-client pool to the same desynchronization. This issue is fixed in 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9.

  40. CVE-2026-70558 9.8 Critique

    DataLinkDC Dinky

    Dinky's POST /download/uploadFromRsByLocal handler passes the caller-supplied path parameter directly to new File(path) and file.transferTo(dest) with no path validation. The route is marked @SaIgnore and /download/** is excluded from the Sa-Token interceptor, so the only guard is a header equality check against a dinkyToken value whose default (efda1551-7958-4e0f-80a8-dfd107df3e38) is hardcoded in source and shipped to every deployment. Anyone who can reach Dinky's HTTP port (8888 by default) and supplies the hardcoded token can write arbitrary files as the Dinky service account. The default Docker image runs on 8888 with no proxy or authentication and chmod 777 on /opt/dinky, so the application's own classpath, launch scripts, and static assets are writable. Demonstrated impact: overwriting /opt/dinky/config/static/index.html served attacker JavaScript to admin browsers immediately, and writing /opt/dinky/org/dinky/Dinky.class executed attacker code as the Dinky service account at the next JVM start via a classpath-shadow launched by script/bin/auto.sh. Writes are uid 9999 (flink), not root, so /etc, /root, /home, and /usr are refused. Affects Dinky v1.2.5 (the current release) and the development branch, where the code is byte-identical.

  41. CVE-2026-69125 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67321. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67321. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67321 instead of this candidate.

  42. CVE-2026-69124 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67320. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67320. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67320 instead of this candidate.

  43. CVE-2026-69123 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67319. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67319. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67319 instead of this candidate.

  44. CVE-2026-68948 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67318. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67318. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67318 instead of this candidate.

  45. CVE-2026-68947 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67317. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67317. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67317 instead of this candidate.

  46. CVE-2026-68946 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67315. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67315. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67315 instead of this candidate.

  47. CVE-2026-68944 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67316. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67316. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67316 instead of this candidate.

  48. CVE-2026-68943 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67314. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67314. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67314 instead of this candidate.

  49. CVE-2026-68942 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67313. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67313. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67313 instead of this candidate.

  50. CVE-2026-68941 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67312. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67312. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67312 instead of this candidate.

  51. CVE-2026-68480 – Non évaluée

    Linux

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/bugs: Make Safe-RET robust against interrupt injection An attacker injecting interrupts while the Safe-RET mitigation executes on machines affected by SRSO can neutralize the safe return sequence, potentially leading to data leakage through speculative execution. Fixup register state as if the Safe-RET sequence executed successfully by "emulating" it, in a manner of speaking, and avoid executing a RET instruction after returning from the interrupt.

  52. CVE-2026-67689 9.8 Critique

    SQL Injection vulnerability in FineAdmin V1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the `field` and `order` parameters in paginated list endpoints

  53. CVE-2026-67688 9.8 Critique

    ICS-Park Smart Park Management System v2.0 contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability in the file upload module. This allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.

  54. CVE-2026-67622 9.9 Critique

    FlowiseAI Flowise

    Flowise through 3.1.4 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the OpenAI Assistants integration that allows authenticated attackers to access credentials belonging to other workspaces by supplying an arbitrary credential UUID to Assistants endpoints without workspace ownership verification. Attackers can enumerate cross-workspace assistant metadata, retrieve file and vector store listings, and upload files into victim workspaces by exploiting the missing workspace-scoped authorization check in the credential lookup logic.

  55. CVE-2026-65400 9.8 Critique Exploitée

    Apple macOS

    An authentication issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.7.9, macOS Sonoma 14.8.9, macOS Tahoe 26.6.1, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An attacker on the network may be able to authenticate to Screen Sharing without valid credentials.

  56. CVE-2026-53984 9.1 Critique

    Efstratios Goudelis Ground Station

    Ground Station prior to 0.6.0 contains an unauthenticated database-destruction and arbitrary-data-injection vulnerability in the Socket.IO server's database_backup event handler that allows any unauthenticated network peer to wipe or replace the entire SQLite database by sending a single full_restore command with a caller-supplied SQL blob. Attackers can connect to the Socket.IO server on port 7000 without credentials due to disabled authentication enforcement and a wildcard CORS policy, then emit the database_backup event to drop every existing table and recreate the database from attacker-controlled CREATE TABLE and INSERT INTO statements executed via raw exec_driver_sql, permanently destroying all satellite records, orbital sources, hardware configurations, and observation schedules, or planting fabricated orbital-source URLs and observation entries that redirect the ground station to attacker-controlled servers on the next scheduled sync.

  57. CVE-2026-48088 9.4 Critique

    open-reception appointment-booking-software

    OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.4, the route `POST /api/tenants/{tenantId}/staff/{staffId}/crypto` accepts and stores attacker-controlled ML-KEM-768 public keys against any tenant on the platform without authentication. The handler logs an "Unauthorized crypto key storage attempt" warning when neither a session nor a registration cookie is present, then proceeds to insert the row regardless. The platform's E2E claim that "even administrators cannot view sensitive information" is broken: any unauthenticated network attacker can register themselves as an additional encryption recipient for any tenant's future patient appointments. A second variant of the bug suppresses the unauthorized-warning log entry. The Zod schema makes the `email` field optional. When the request body omits `email` and the request carries no registration cookie, the comparison `registrationEmail === email` becomes `undefined === undefined`, which evaluates to `true`. The handler treats the request as a legitimate registration flow, skips the warning entirely, and stores the row. Successful storage is still recorded as an `[info]` log line, but the security-relevant warning that operators are most likely to monitor or alert on is gone. The `staff_crypto` table has no unique constraint on `user_id`, so an arbitrary number of attacker rows can coexist for the same staff identifier and all return as `is_active=true`. The supplied `staffId` does not need to match any existing user or pending invite. Schema validation on `passkeyId`, `publicKey`, and `privateKeyShare` is also weak: the literal string `<placeholder-base64>` was accepted, indicating no length, format, or cryptographic-validity check beyond field presence. This weakness is independent of the auth bypass but compounds it: a poisoned directory can also be filled with malformed entries that break legitimate booking flows. The injected key is consumed by the public booking flow. After completing the unauthenticated `bootstrap-challenge` and `bootstrap-verify` ceremony as a "patient", the resulting `bookingAccessToken` is accepted by `GET /api/tenants/{id}/appointments/staff-public-keys`, which returns the attacker-controlled keys alongside any legitimate ones. A new appointment encrypts its tunnel key with ML-KEM to all listed recipients, so the attacker becomes a co-recipient of the encryption and can decapsulate the tunnel key with the matching secret. From there, all appointment payloads for that booking are decryptable. Version 1.0.4 patches the issue.

  58. CVE-2026-48087 9.8 Critique

    open-reception appointment-booking-software

    OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, the registration handler at `POST /api/auth/register/{userId}` validates the relationship between the WebAuthn challenge and the registration cookie's email but never validates that the `userId` in the URL belongs to that email. An unauthenticated attacker requests a challenge for their own email, generates a registration response with their own authenticator, and submits it against any victim user's URL. The challenge-vs-cookie email match passes, the WebAuthn ceremony validates, and `addPasskey` writes the attacker's credential into the victim's `user_passkey` rows. The next victim-email login accepts a passkey assertion from the attacker's authenticator and issues a session as the victim. User IDs are not strictly secret on this platform, but the exact set of exposure surfaces should be assessed by the maintainers. Staff-list endpoints return user IDs to authenticated tenant members per the route signature; live verification of all exposure surfaces (whether user IDs leak through any unauthenticated route, through invite-confirmation URLs, or through other administrative views) is part of the pending live PoC. Where the attacker knows the victim's email and userId, the analysis below becomes account takeover. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue.

  59. CVE-2026-48086 9.9 Critique

    open-reception appointment-booking-software

    OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, a TENANT_ADMIN promotes themselves to platform-wide GLOBAL_ADMIN through a single PUT request. The role-update handler accepts the `GLOBAL_ADMIN` enum value from any tenant admin updating their own tenant's staff. No policy check enforces that "only an existing GLOBAL_ADMIN may grant GLOBAL_ADMIN", so the schema validation IS the authorization decision. After re-login, the JWT contains the new role and the formerly-tenant-scoped admin reaches every other tenant on the platform. On the hosted OpenReception service this is a scope-changed escalation: a single customer-side tenant administrator gains full platform-wide administrative control over all other tenants' configuration, users, staff records, operational metadata, and tenant lifecycle. Plaintext appointment contents remain subject to the E2E model unless chained with the staff-crypto poisoning issue (V-4) or with staff-passkey hijacking (V-1). On a single-tenant self-hosted deployment it is still a privilege escalation because TENANT_ADMIN should not be able to create new tenants, modify global configuration, or manage other administrators. The same handler also accepts updates targeted at any colleague within the tenant. A tenant admin can promote a separate collaborator account instead of themselves, leaving their own audit trail clean while the platform-wide breach happens through a separate identity. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue.

  60. CVE-2026-48085 9.8 Critique

    open-reception appointment-booking-software

    OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.1, a fully provisioned OpenReception instance accepts unauthenticated POST requests to `/setup/create-admin-account` and creates additional GLOBAL_ADMIN accounts without verifying that an admin already exists. Any unauthenticated network attacker who can submit a same-origin form POST gains full platform-level administrative control. The newly created account is `is_active=true` with `confirmation_state=ACCESS_GRANTED` and does not require completing email confirmation; the GLOBAL_ADMIN row is created active and immediately usable. Login and tenant enumeration succeed without any further interaction. This is distinct from the deployment race condition already documented on the `Claiming an instance` page. That documented race covers the window between deployment and first claim. The bug reported here works after the operator has properly claimed and configured the instance: the layout-level guard that protects the setup page only redirects on GET, while the `default` form action handler creates the user without rechecking `adminExists()`. Three GLOBAL_ADMIN accounts were created in succession during testing, with no rate limiting observed. Audit-specific event logging beyond standard application logs was not assessed; the standard `[error]` line that surfaces only when a uniqueness conflict is hit is not the same as a security event for "additional admin created post-claim". The form post is rejected for browser drive-by CSRF by SvelteKit's built-in same-origin check, but any tool that supplies a matching `Origin` header (curl, Burp, automated scanners, server-side proxies) bypasses this trivially. No additional preconditions exist. Users should upgrade to version 1.0.1 to receive a patch.

  61. CVE-2026-3418 9.1 Critique

    WSO2 API Manager · WSO2 Traffic Manager · WSO2 API Control Plane · WSO2 Universal Gateway

    The System REST API accepts user-supplied file uploads without enforcing sufficient validation on the file type or destination, allowing files to be written to arbitrary server-accessible locations. Exploitation requires authenticated administrative access with publisher privileges. Successful exploitation permits an authenticated publisher to upload files to server-accessible locations. Depending on the deployment environment and how uploaded files are handled, this could lead to the execution of uploaded content, potentially resulting in remote code execution.

  62. CVE-2026-33181 – Non évaluée Rejetée

    Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-33942. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-33942. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-33942 instead of this candidate.

  63. CVE-2026-19175 9.6 Critique

    Google Chrome

    Use after free in Payments in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

  64. CVE-2026-19171 9.6 Critique

    Google Chrome

    Use after free in Media in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

  65. CVE-2026-19170 9.6 Critique

    Google Chrome

    Use after free in WebGL in Google Chrome on Android prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)

  66. CVE-2026-19166 9.6 Critique

    Google Chrome

    Use after free in Web Authentication in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

  67. CVE-2026-19164 9.6 Critique

    Google Chrome

    Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Codecs in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

  68. CVE-2026-19157 9.6 Critique

    Google Chrome

    Out of bounds write in ANGLE in Google Chrome on Android prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)

  69. CVE-2026-19149 9.6 Critique

    Google Chrome

    Use after free in Aura in Google Chrome on Linux prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)

  70. CVE-2026-18367 9.3 Critique

    Sophos Endpoint for macOS · Sophos Home for macOS

    A privilege escalation vulnerability allows local users to execute arbitrary code as root via Sophos Endpoint for macOS older than version 2026.1.1 and Sophos Home for macOS older than version 10.11.6.

  71. CVE-2026-17032 9.8 Critique

    Unknown google-maps-easy-pro · Unknown supsystic-gallery-pro · Unknown tables-generator-pro

    Multiple Supsystic Pro plugins were distributed with malicious code through the vendor's compromised update server, allowing unauthenticated attackers to deploy a second-stage payload that exfiltrates credentials and other sensitive data and grants full control of affected sites.

  72. CVE-2026-15734 9.8 Critique

    WGDashboard

    A Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability in WGDashboard version 4.3.2 and earlier, allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code as root.

  73. CVE-2026-15733 9.8 Critique

    WGDashboard

    A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exist in WGDashboard version 4.2.3 and earlier. Multiple OS command injection allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root.

  74. CVE-2026-15732 9.8 Critique

    WGDashboard

    A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSFR) vulnerability exist in WGDashboard version 4.2.3 and earlier. The webhook functionality allows authenticated attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests and retrieve responses.

  75. CVE-2026-14812 10.0 Critique

    Unknown Premium SEO

    The Premium SEO WordPress plugin is malicious: it ships an unauthenticated backdoor that creates a hidden administrator account and, in some builds, also enables remote code execution, server-side request forgery and arbitrary front-end script/content injection, giving an unauthenticated attacker full control of the affected site.

  76. CVE-2026-11976 10.0 Critique

    Unknown MonsterInsights Pro

    The official MonsterInsights Pro update distribution bucket (`monster-insights.s3.amazonaws.com`) was compromised. Both the current release (10.2.2) and the version MonsterInsights rolled back to (10.2.0) contain a malicious file, `class-system-check.php`. Three distinct variants were observed on 2026-06-11, all sharing the same AES-256-GCM key, confirming a single threat actor. The attacker retains write access to the S3 bucket and has been actively iterating on the payload throughout the day.

  77. CVE-2025-14561 9.0 Critique

    WSO2 API Manager · WSO2 API Control Plane · WSO2 Traffic Manager · WSO2 Universal Gateway

    In multi-tenant deployments, the Publisher REST APIs fail to enforce tenant isolation correctly. This allows a user in one tenant, possessing sufficient privileges to invoke these APIs, to perform operations that impact other tenants. The vulnerability allows a privileged user to perform publisher operations such as exposing or modifying API Metadata in another tenant environment. This impact is only realized in multi-tenant deployments.