Veille CVE

Semaine du 1 juin au 7 juin 2026

6 CVE

Critique 0 Élevée 3 Moyenne 2 Faible 1 Non évaluée 0 Exploitées (KEV) Tri : plus récentes « Red Hat OpenShift Update Service » ✕
  1. CVE-2026-11332 7.8 Élevée

    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 10 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9

    A flaw was found in ansible-core. The ansible-galaxy role install command processes dependency specifications from a role's meta/requirements.yml file. Due to improper neutralization of argument delimiters, a malicious role author can inject arbitrary git configuration flags through the src field. This allows arbitrary code execution on the machine of a user who installs the role via ansible-galaxy role install.

  2. CVE-2026-10805 6.7 Moyenne

    Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support

    A flaw was found in NetworkManager. This local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in NetworkManager's dhclient backend when processing malformed Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) URLs. A local user can exploit this flaw to escalate privileges by triggering a script via a crafted MUD URL, provided an administrator has explicitly configured NetworkManager to use dhclient. This issue does not affect default configurations of NetworkManager.

  3. CVE-2026-27145 6.5 Moyenne

    Go standard library crypto/x509 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 10

    (*x509.Certificate).VerifyHostname previously called matchHostnames in a loop over all DNS Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries. This caused strings.Split(host, ".") to execute repeatedly on the same input hostname. With a large DNS SAN list, verification costs scaled quadratically based on the number of SAN entries multiplied by the hostname's label count. Because x509.Verify validates hostnames before building the certificate chain, this overhead occurred even for untrusted certificates.

  4. CVE-2026-5419 3.7 Faible

    Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions

    A flaw was found in gnutls. The PKCS#7 padding check, performed during decryption, was not constant-time. This timing side-channel could allow a remote attacker to potentially leak sensitive information about the padding bytes through observable timing differences. This vulnerability is a form of information disclosure.

  5. CVE-2026-46243 7.1 Élevée

    Linux · Red Hat NVIDIA for RHEL 10 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: reject userspace cifs.spnego descriptions cifs.spnego key descriptions contain authority-bearing fields such as pid, uid, creduid, and upcall_target that cifs.upcall treats as kernel-originating inputs. However, userspace can also create keys of this type through request_key(2) or add_key(2), allowing those fields to be supplied without CIFS origin. Only accept cifs.spnego descriptions while CIFS is using its private spnego_cred to request the key.

  6. CVE-2026-10118 7.8 Élevée

    Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

    A flaw was found in Poppler's Splash backend. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious PDF file that, when rendered, triggers an integer overflow in the `tilingPatternFill` function. This overflow leads to an undersized heap memory allocation, allowing a subsequent out-of-bounds write. Successful exploitation could result in arbitrary code execution, information disclosure, or denial of service within the context of the application processing the PDF.