Lundi 27 avril 2026
30 CVE sur 213
-
CVE-2026-7156 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A vulnerability was detected in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Affected is the function CsteSystem of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. The manipulation of the argument HTTP results in os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.
-
CVE-2026-7155 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A security vulnerability has been detected in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This impacts the function setLoginPasswordCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. The manipulation of the argument admpass leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
-
CVE-2026-7154 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A weakness has been identified in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This affects the function setAdvancedInfoShow of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument tty_server can lead to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
-
CVE-2024-46636 9.4 Critique
NASA Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) MODAPS v8.1 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the category parameter
-
CVE-2026-7153 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A security flaw has been discovered in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. The impacted element is the function setMiniuiHomeInfoShow of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument sys_info results in os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
-
CVE-2026-7152 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. The affected element is the function setTelnetCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument telnet_enabled leads to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
-
CVE-2026-35903 9.8 Critique
Mercurycom mipc252w firmware
MERCURY MIPC252W IP camera 1.0.5 Build 230306 Rel.79931n contains an improper authentication vulnerability in the RTSP service. After successful Digest authentication in an initial DESCRIBE request, the device does not verify the Digest response parameter in subsequent RTSP requests within the same session. As a result, RTSP methods such as SETUP, PLAY, and TEARDOWN can be processed even when the Authorization header contains an empty or invalid response value, as long as the nonce and session identifier correspond to a previously authenticated session. This allows an attacker with network access to reuse session parameters and issue unauthorized RTSP control commands without computing a valid Digest response.
-
CVE-2026-31255 9.8 Critique
Tenda ac18 firmware
A command injection vulnerability exists in Tenda AC18 V15.03.05.05_multi. The vulnerability is located in the /goform/SetSambaCfg interface, where improper handling of the guestuser parameter allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands.
-
CVE-2026-7140 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A vulnerability has been found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Impacted is the function CsteSystem of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument HTTP leads to os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
-
CVE-2026-7139 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A flaw has been found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This issue affects the function setWiFiAclRules of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. This manipulation of the argument mode causes os command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
-
CVE-2026-7138 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A vulnerability was detected in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This vulnerability affects the function setNtpCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. The manipulation of the argument tz results in os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.
-
CVE-2026-7137 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A security vulnerability has been detected in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This affects the function setStorageCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. The manipulation of the argument sambaEnabled leads to os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
-
CVE-2026-7136 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A weakness has been identified in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Affected by this issue is the function setDmzCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument wanIdx can lead to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
-
CVE-2026-41462 9.8 Critique
ProjeQtor
ProjeQtor versions 7.0 through 12.4.3 contain an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the login functionality where the login variable is directly concatenated into a SQL query without parameterization or sanitization. Attackers can inject arbitrary SQL expressions through the username field at the authentication endpoint to create privileged accounts, read sensitive data, and execute operating system commands if the database user has elevated permissions.
-
CVE-2026-30352 9.8 Critique
A remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in the /devserver/start endpoint of leonvanzyl autocoder commit 79d02a allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via providing a crafted command parameter.
-
CVE-2026-40514 9.1 Critique
SmarterTools Inc. SmarterMail · Smartertools smartermail
SmarterTools SmarterMail builds prior to 9610 contain a cryptographic weakness in the file and email sharing endpoints that use DES-CBC encryption with keys and initialization vectors derived from System.Random seeded with insufficient entropy, reducing the seed space to approximately 19,000 possible values. An unauthenticated attacker can use the attachment download endpoint as an oracle to determine the seed in use and derive encryption keys and initialization vectors to forge sharing tokens for arbitrary emails, attachments, or file storage contents without prior access to the targeted content.
-
CVE-2026-7125 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Affected by this issue is the function setWiFiEasyCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. The manipulation of the argument merge leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
-
CVE-2026-7124 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Affected by this vulnerability is the function setIpv6LanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument addrPrefixLen can lead to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
-
CVE-2026-7123 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Affected is the function setIptvCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument setIptvCfg results in os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
-
CVE-2026-7122 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A vulnerability has been found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This impacts the function setUPnPCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument enable leads to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
-
CVE-2026-7121 9.8 Critique
Totolink A8000RU
A flaw has been found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This affects the function setWizardCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. This manipulation of the argument wizard causes os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
-
CVE-2026-33453 10.0 Critique
Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel · Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1 for Spring Boot 3.5.14 · Red Hat Fuse 7 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8
Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes vulnerability in Apache Camel Camel-Coap component. Apache Camel's camel-coap component is vulnerable to Camel message header injection, leading to remote code execution when routes forward CoAP requests to header-sensitive producers (e.g. camel-exec) The camel-coap component maps incoming CoAP request URI query parameters directly into Camel Exchange In message headers without applying any HeaderFilterStrategy. Specifically, CamelCoapResource.handleRequest() iterates over OptionSet.getUriQuery() and calls camelExchange.getIn().setHeader(...) for every query parameter. CoAPEndpoint extends DefaultEndpoint rather than DefaultHeaderFilterStrategyEndpoint, and CoAPComponent does not implement HeaderFilterStrategyComponent; the component contains no references to HeaderFilterStrategy at all. As a result, an unauthenticated attacker who can send a single CoAP UDP packet to a Camel route consuming from coap:// can inject arbitrary Camel internal headers (those prefixed with Camel*) into the Exchange. When the route delivers the message to a header-sensitive producer such as camel-exec, camel-sql, camel-bean, camel-file, or template components (camel-freemarker, camel-velocity), the injected headers can alter the producer's behavior. In the case of camel-exec, the CamelExecCommandExecutable and CamelExecCommandArgs headers override the executable and arguments configured on the endpoint, resulting in arbitrary OS command execution under the privileges of the Camel process. The producer's output is written back to the Exchange body and returned in the CoAP response payload by CamelCoapResource, giving the attacker an interactive RCE channel without any need for out-of-band exfiltration. Exploitation prerequisites are minimal: a single unauthenticated UDP datagram to the CoAP port (default 5683). CoAP (RFC 7252) has no built-in authentication, and DTLS is optional and disabled by default. Because the protocol is UDP-based, HTTP-layer WAF/IDS controls do not apply. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.14.0 through 4.14.5, from 4.18.0 before 4.18.1, 4.19.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.18.1 or 4.19.0, fixing the issue.
-
CVE-2026-22337 9.8 Critique
Directorist Social Login
Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Directorist Directorist Social Login allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Directorist Social Login: from n/a before 2.1.4.
-
CVE-2026-22336 9.3 Critique
Directorist Booking
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Directorist Booking allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Directorist Booking: from n/a before 3.0.2.
-
CVE-2026-41409 9.8 Critique
Apache Software Foundation Apache MINA · Apache mina
The fix for CVE-2024-52046 in Apache MINA AbstractIoBuffer.getObject() was incomplete. The classname allowlist of classes allowed to be deserialized was applied too late after a static initializer in a class to be read might already have been executed. Affected versions are Apache MINA 2.0.0 <= 2.0.27, 2.1.0 <= 2.1.10, and 2.2.0 <= 2.2.5. The problem is resolved in Apache MINA 2.0.28, 2.1.11, and 2.2.6 by applying the classname allowlist earlier. Affected are applications using Apache MINA that call IoBuffer.getObject(). Applications using Apache MINA are advised to upgrade
-
CVE-2026-33454 9.4 Critique
Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel · Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.14 for Quarkus 3.27 · Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1 for Spring Boot 3.5.14 · Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
The Camel-Mail component is vulnerable to Camel message header injection. The custom header filter strategy used by the component (MailHeaderFilterStrategy) only filters the 'out' direction via setOutFilterStartsWith, while it does not configure the 'in' direction via setInFilterStartsWith. As a result, when a Camel application consumes mail through camel-mail (for example via from(\"imap://...\") or from(\"pop3://...\")) the inbound filter check is skipped and Camel-prefixed MIME headers are mapped unfiltered into the Exchange. An attacker who can deliver an email to a mailbox monitored by such a consumer can inject Camel-specific headers that, for some Camel components downstream of the mail consumer (such as camel-bean, camel-exec, or camel-sql), can alter the behaviour of the route. This is the same pattern that was previously addressed in camel-undertow (CVE-2025-30177) and the broader incoming-header filter (CVE-2025-27636 and CVE-2025-29891). This issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.0.0 before 4.14.6, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.19.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.1. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.6.
-
CVE-2026-41635 9.8 Critique
Apache Software Foundation Apache MINA · Apache mina
Apache MINA's AbstractIoBuffer.resolveClass() contains two branches, one of them (for static classes or primitive types) does not check the class at all, bypassing the classname allowlist and allowing arbitrary code to be executed. The fix checks if the class is present in the accepted class filter before calling Class.forName(). Affected versions are Apache MINA 2.0.0 <= 2.0.27, 2.1.0 <= 2.1.10, and 2.2.0 <= 2.2.5. The problem is resolved in Apache MINA 2.0.28, 2.1.11, and 2.2.6 by applying the classname allowlist earlier. Affected are applications using Apache MINA that call IoBuffer.getObject(). Applications using Apache MINA are advised to upgrade.
-
CVE-2026-40860 9.8 Critique
Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel · Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1 for Spring Boot 3.5.14 · Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.18 for Quarkus 3.33 · Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
JmsBinding.extractBodyFromJms() in camel-jms, and the equivalent JmsBinding class in camel-sjms, deserialized the payload of incoming JMS ObjectMessage values via javax.jms.ObjectMessage.getObject() without applying any ObjectInputFilter, class allowlist or class denylist. Because this code path is reached whenever the mapJmsMessage option is enabled (the default) and Camel acts as a JMS consumer, an attacker able to publish a crafted ObjectMessage to a queue or topic consumed by a Camel application could achieve remote code execution when a deserialization gadget chain was present on the classpath. The same handling was reached transitively through camel-sjms2 (whose Sjms2Endpoint extends SjmsEndpoint) and through camel-amqp (whose AMQPJmsBinding extends JmsBinding), and by other JMS-family components built on JmsComponent such as camel-activemq and camel-activemq6. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.0.0 before 4.14.7, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.2, from 4.19.0 before 4.20.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.7. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.2.
-
CVE-2026-40453 9.9 Critique
Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel JMS · Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel CoAP · Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel Google PubSub · Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.14 for Quarkus 3.27
The fix for CVE-2025-27636 added setLowerCase(true) to HttpHeaderFilterStrategy so that case-variant header names such as 'CAmelExecCommandExecutable' are filtered out alongside 'CamelExecCommandExecutable'. The same setLowerCase(true) call was not applied to five non-HTTP HeaderFilterStrategy implementations: JmsHeaderFilterStrategy and ClassicJmsHeaderFilterStrategy in camel-jms, SjmsHeaderFilterStrategy in camel-sjms, CoAPHeaderFilterStrategy in camel-coap, and GooglePubsubHeaderFilterStrategy in camel-google-pubsub. Because those strategies use case-sensitive String.startsWith('Camel'/'camel') filtering while the Camel Exchange stores headers in a case-insensitive map, an attacker with JMS (or equivalent) producer access to the broker consumed by a Camel route can inject case-variant Camel internal headers, which are then resolved by downstream components such as camel-exec and camel-file using their canonical casing. This enables remote code execution and arbitrary file write on routes that forward JMS messages to header-driven components. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.0.0 before 4.14.6, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.2, from 4.19.0 before 4.20.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.6. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.2.
-
CVE-2026-42363 9.3 Critique
GeoVision Inc. GV-IP Device Utility
An insufficient encryption vulnerability exists in the Device Authentication functionality of GeoVision GV-IP Device Utility 9.0.5. Listening to broadcast packets can lead to credentials leak. An attacker can listen to broadcast messages to trigger this vulnerability. When interacting with various Geovision devices on the network, the utility may send privileged commands; in order to do so, the username and password of the device need to be provided. In some instances the command is broadcasted over UDP and the username/password are encrypted using a cryptographic protocol that appears to be derivated from Blowfish. However the symmetric key used for the encryption is also included in the packet, and thus the security of the username/password only relies on the "obscurity" of the encryption scheme. An attacker on the same LAN can listen to the broadcast traffic once an admin user interacts with the device, and decrypt the credentials using their own implementation of the algorithm. With this password the attacker would have full control over the device configuration, allowing them to change its ip address or even reset it to factory default.