Veille CVE

Toutes les dates

41 307 CVE

  1. CVE-2026-115509 4.2 Moyenne

    jitsucom jitsu

    Jitsu console before 2.14.0-beta.41 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in sources/state.ts handlers that call findFirst without await, so the syncId ownership check never fails. Authenticated users knowing another workspace's sync ID can read, overwrite or delete its stream cursors, causing data re-ingestion or skipped data.

  2. CVE-2026-115508 6.5 Moyenne

    unclecode crawl4ai

    Crawl4AI 0.7.0 before 0.9.5 contains an inefficient regular expression complexity vulnerability in the Docker API server that allows authenticated API clients to supply unbounded regular expressions in /crawl request bodies. Attackers can submit catastrophic-backtracking patterns via RegexExtractionStrategy.custom, RegexChunking.patterns or JsonCss, JsonXPath and JsonLxml schema regex fields against a crafted page to freeze the entire server, including /health.

  3. CVE-2026-115507 3.5 Faible

    go-vikunja vikunja

    Vikunja 2.2.0 before 2.7.1 contains an HTML injection vulnerability in CreateConversationalHeader in pkg/notifications/mail.go that interpolates display names and task and project titles raw into email anchors. Authenticated users can craft titles or display names that close the anchor and inject phishing links into task-comment and task-mention notification emails sent to project members.

  4. CVE-2026-115506 7.5 Élevée

    libexpat

    libexpat through 2.9.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability because billion laughs protection in accountingDiffTolerated() in xmlparse.c detects entity amplification too late. Attackers can supply a moderately sized XML document with a large DTD and nested entity expansions to consume tens of seconds of CPU per parse.

  5. CVE-2026-115505 7.6 Élevée

    sahlberg libsmb2

    libsmb2 before 6.3 contains integer overflow vulnerabilities in the DCE/RPC NDR decoder in lib/dcerpc.c that allow heap out-of-bounds reads and writes. A malicious SMB server or machine-in-the-middle on unsigned connections can send crafted NetrShareEnum replies with wrapping actual_count or max_count values when clients call smb2_share_enum_async(), corrupting heap memory.

  6. CVE-2026-115504 7.8 Élevée

    HEASARC cfitsio

    CFITSIO through 4.7.0 contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in ffgcls2() in getcols.c that trusts attacker-controlled heap descriptor lengths for variable-length string columns. Attackers can supply a crafted FITS file that overflows a fixed 28,800-byte stack buffer and the caller's string array, enabling arbitrary code execution.

  7. CVE-2026-115503 5.5 Moyenne

    NationalSecurityAgency ghidra

    Ghidra before 12.2 contains an improper handling of highly compressed data vulnerability in ExtensionUtils.unzipToInstallationFolder() that allows attackers to exhaust disk space. Attackers can persuade users to install a crafted zip bomb extension archive that expands without size limits, causing later writes by Ghidra and other applications to fail.

  8. CVE-2026-115398 5.5 Moyenne

    NationalSecurityAgency ghidra

    Ghidra before 12.2 contains a resource allocation without limits vulnerability in FileSystemIndexHelper used by TarFileSystem and ZipFileSystem, which store unbounded archive entries. Attackers can persuade a user to open or batch-import a crafted TAR or ZIP archive with excessive entries to exhaust the Java heap and hang the session.

  9. CVE-2026-112332 7.5 Élevée

    GDATASoftwareAG motornet

    Motor.NET before 0.19.0 contains an uncaught exception vulnerability in JsonNetDeserializer.Deserialize that allows a remote attacker who can publish to a consumed queue or topic to crash the service permanently by sending structurally valid JSON that does not match the handler's expected type. Attackers can exploit the fact that JsonSerializationException is not caught alongside JsonReaderException and InvalidCastException, causing TypedConsumerService.SingleMessageConsumeAsync to treat the error as CriticalFailure and call StopApplication, which combined with the unacknowledged message being redelivered on restart results in a permanent crash-loop.

  10. CVE-2026-112331 7.5 Élevée

    GDATASoftwareAG motornet

    Motor.NET before 0.19.0 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that allows a remote attacker who can produce records to a consumed topic to crash the service permanently by sending a single crafted record. By setting the content-type header to application/cloudevents+json and omitting required CloudEvent attributes (id, source, type), the attacker triggers an ArgumentException in KafkaMessageConsumer.SingleMessageHandlingAsync that is treated as fatal, causing the host to stop and re-process the same poison record on every restart, resulting in a permanent crash-loop.

  11. CVE-2026-112330 7.5 Élevée

    GDATASoftwareAG motornet

    Motor.NET before 0.19.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows a remote attacker who can publish to a consumed queue to crash the service permanently by sending a message with crafted cloudEvents headers. Attackers can supply an invalid cloudEvents:motorversion, a single double-quote header value, or an unparsable typed attribute such as cloudEvents:time to trigger an unhandled exception in ExtractCloudEvent that is treated as fatal, causing the application to stop and the unacknowledged message to be redelivered on restart, resulting in a permanent crash-loop.

  12. CVE-2026-95721 3.3 Faible

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  13. CVE-2026-95720 4.4 Moyenne

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  14. CVE-2026-95719 4.9 Moyenne

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  15. CVE-2026-95718 5.3 Moyenne

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  16. CVE-2026-95717 5.5 Moyenne

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  17. CVE-2026-95716 6.5 Moyenne

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  18. CVE-2026-95715 6.8 Moyenne

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  19. CVE-2026-95714 6.8 Moyenne

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  20. CVE-2026-95713 7.0 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  21. CVE-2026-95712 7.1 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  22. CVE-2026-95711 7.1 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  23. CVE-2026-95710 7.1 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  24. CVE-2026-95709 7.2 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  25. CVE-2026-95708 7.2 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  26. CVE-2026-95707 7.2 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  27. CVE-2026-95706 7.2 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  28. CVE-2026-95705 7.2 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  29. CVE-2026-95704 7.2 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  30. CVE-2026-79956 7.2 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  31. CVE-2026-79955 7.5 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  32. CVE-2026-79895 7.5 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  33. CVE-2026-79894 7.5 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  34. CVE-2026-79893 7.5 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  35. CVE-2026-79892 7.8 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  36. CVE-2026-79891 8.1 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  37. CVE-2026-79890 8.1 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  38. CVE-2026-79889 8.1 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  39. CVE-2026-79888 8.1 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  40. CVE-2026-79887 8.1 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  41. CVE-2026-79886 8.2 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  42. CVE-2026-79885 8.2 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  43. CVE-2026-79884 8.2 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  44. CVE-2026-79883 8.3 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  45. CVE-2026-79882 8.3 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  46. CVE-2026-79881 8.3 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  47. CVE-2026-79880 8.7 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  48. CVE-2026-79879 8.8 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  49. CVE-2026-79878 8.8 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  50. CVE-2026-79877 8.8 Élevée

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  51. CVE-2026-79876 9.3 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  52. CVE-2026-79875 9.3 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  53. CVE-2026-79874 9.3 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  54. CVE-2026-79873 9.3 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  55. CVE-2026-79872 9.4 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  56. CVE-2026-79871 9.6 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  57. CVE-2026-79870 9.6 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  58. CVE-2026-79869 9.6 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  59. CVE-2026-79868 9.6 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  60. CVE-2026-79867 9.6 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  61. CVE-2026-79866 9.6 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  62. CVE-2026-79865 9.6 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  63. CVE-2026-79864 9.6 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  64. CVE-2026-79863 9.6 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  65. CVE-2026-79862 9.6 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  66. CVE-2026-79861 9.8 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  67. CVE-2026-79860 9.8 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  68. CVE-2026-79859 9.8 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  69. CVE-2026-79858 9.8 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  70. CVE-2026-79857 9.8 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  71. CVE-2026-79856 9.8 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  72. CVE-2026-79855 9.8 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  73. CVE-2026-79854 9.8 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  74. CVE-2026-79853 9.8 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  75. CVE-2026-79852 9.8 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  76. CVE-2026-79851 10.0 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  77. CVE-2026-79850 10.0 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  78. CVE-2026-79849 10.0 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  79. CVE-2026-79848 10.0 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  80. CVE-2026-79847 10.0 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  81. CVE-2026-79846 10.0 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  82. CVE-2026-79844 10.0 Critique

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) Unknown product

    No description provided

  83. CVE-2026-115519 2.1 Faible

    KNIME Business Hub

    Missing security attributes on sensitive cookies in KNIME Business Hub before version 1.19.0 allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to compromise user sessions if other security issues such as a cross-site scripting vulnerability or a man-in-the-middle attack are present. A workaround is not possible.

  84. CVE-2026-115517 6.4 Moyenne

    KNIME Business Hub

    Unrestricted network access between execution contexts in KNIME Business Hub before version 1.19.0 allows an authenticated remote user to access open network ports on executors in different execution contexts. This only poses a security issue if the IP address of the attacked executor is know and there are open network ports that provided access without further authentication. By default no network ports are open. However, depending on the running workflows, ports may be opened and provide an attack surface. As a workaround, network policies can be created manually.

  85. CVE-2026-115414 7.8 Élevée

    aws-sam-cli

    OS command injection in the Terraform hook in AWS SAM CLI before 1.166.2 might allow an actor who can influence the Terraform configuration or plan file consumed by a build to execute arbitrary commands as the build user on the host running the build via a crafted Terraform resource address. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.166.2 or later.

  86. CVE-2026-115397 5.5 Moyenne

    NationalSecurityAgency ghidra

    Ghidra before 12.2 contains a resource allocation without limits vulnerability in ExtensionUtils.unzipToInstallationFolder() that extracts every extension ZIP entry without limiting file count. Attackers who persuade a user to install a crafted extension archive with many files can exhaust filesystem inodes, causing project writes and other processes to fail.

  87. CVE-2026-115396 5.5 Moyenne

    NationalSecurityAgency ghidra

    Ghidra 10.3 before 12.2 contains an improper handling of highly compressed data vulnerability in ThemeReader.processIconFile() that fails to limit decompressed size or compression ratio. Attackers can persuade a user to import a crafted theme ZIP whose icon entries expand to fill the host filesystem, causing later writes to fail.

  88. CVE-2026-115395 5.5 Moyenne

    NationalSecurityAgency ghidra

    Ghidra 10.3 before 12.2 contains a resource allocation without limits vulnerability in ThemeReader.readZipTheme() that extracts unlimited theme ZIP entries to the images directory. Attackers can persuade users to import a crafted theme archive with many small files, exhausting inodes and disk space to deny service to the host.

  89. CVE-2026-115394 5.5 Moyenne

    NationalSecurityAgency ghidra

    Ghidra through 12.2 contains an uncontrolled memory allocation vulnerability in BinaryField.read() that allows attackers to exhaust heap memory via an unchecked 32-bit length field. Attackers can persuade users to import a crafted GZF packed database file, triggering an OutOfMemoryError in PackedDatabase.open() that aborts the import and denies service.

  90. CVE-2026-115393 3.8 Faible

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime before 24.0.12, 25.0.0 before 36.0.13, 37.0.0 before 46.0.2, and 47.0.0 before 47.0.3 contains a type confusion vulnerability because several Store APIs fail to validate that objects belong to the Store's Engine. Embedders mixing objects between Engines via Instance::new, StructRefPre::new, or Tag::new can trigger trampoline signature mismatches causing out-of-bounds stack writes, GC heap corruption, or panics.

  91. CVE-2026-115392 7.9 Élevée

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime before 24.0.13, 25.0.0 before 36.0.14, 37.0.0 before 46.0.3, and 47.0.0 before 47.0.4 allows a filesystem sandbox escape in wasmtime-wasi because its cap-std dependency mishandles symlinks with trailing slashes on macOS and Linux kernels lacking openat2. A guest with write access to any sandboxed directory can read and write any host-accessible file, and read-only guests may read host files via preexisting symlinks.

  92. CVE-2026-115391 5.8 Moyenne

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime 46.0.0 before 46.0.3 and 47.0.0 before 47.0.4 contains an uncontrolled resource allocation vulnerability in its WASIp3 implementation that buffers guest-specified-length writes on the host without limit. Malicious guests can offer large buffers to WASIp3 file or HTTP write streams, causing the host to copy and buffer all bytes, bounded only by guest linear memory, exhausting host memory.

  93. CVE-2026-115390 5.7 Moyenne

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime 47.0.0 before 48.0.3 and 49.0.0 before 49.0.1 contains a fuel accounting flaw in Cranelift-compiled call_ref and try_table catch paths. Malicious guests can reset consumed fuel after calls to run exponentially long on linear fuel, evading timeouts and periodic yields for denial of service.

  94. CVE-2026-115389 2.3 Faible

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime before 36.0.16, 37.0.0 before 48.0.3, and 49.0.0 before 49.0.1 does not adequately account for host allocations when lifting guest values through the dynamically-typed Val API, bypassing the hostcall fuel limit. A malicious WebAssembly guest can return crafted values that allocate at least ~100x more host memory than tracked, causing denial of service.

  95. CVE-2026-115388 6.2 Moyenne

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    wasmtime-wasi-http in Wasmtime before 36.0.16, 37.0.0 before 48.0.3, and 49.0.0 before 49.0.1 does not enforce the wasi:io/streams check-write allowance for WASIp2 outgoing HTTP bodies, so oversized writes succeed instead of trapping. A malicious guest can pass large buffers to write on outgoing-body resources, holding host allocations for the store's lifetime and exhausting host memory.

  96. CVE-2026-115387 6.2 Moyenne

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime before 36.0.16, 37.0.0 before 48.0.3, and 49.0.0 before 49.0.1 contains a denial of service vulnerability in wasmtime-wasi that allows guest WASI programs to panic the host via overflowing filesystem timestamps. Attackers can pass atim or mtim values whose sub-second field overflows the seconds field to path_filestat_set_times, fd_filestat_set_times, set-times, or set-times-at, crashing the host.

  97. CVE-2026-115386 2.6 Faible

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime before 36.0.17, 37.0.0 before 48.0.4, and 49.0.0 before 49.0.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the WASIp1 fd_readdir implementation that copies uninitialized struct padding into guest memory. Guests with a preopened directory can list entries to receive three bytes of leftover host stack or heap memory per directory entry.

  98. CVE-2026-115385 6.2 Moyenne

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime 46.0.0 before 48.0.4 and 49.0.0 before 49.0.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the wasmtime-wasi WASIp3 implementation that allows guests to abort the Unix host process. Guests with mutable preopened directory access can call set-times or set-times-at with negative seconds timestamps before the epoch, triggering an assertion failure that crashes the host.

  99. CVE-2026-115384 9.9 Critique

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime 39.0.0 before 48.0.4 and 49.0.0 before 49.0.2 contains a stack buffer overflow vulnerability that allows malicious guests to write ~16KB to the native stack via unvalidated async callback result types. Attackers can supply components with mistyped component-model-async callback functions to overwrite return addresses, crashing the host or escaping the sandbox.

  100. CVE-2026-115383 4.8 Moyenne

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime 47.0.0 before 48.0.4 and 49.0.0 before 49.0.2 contains an improper validation vulnerability that accepts components whose core modules import WebAssembly tags with a subtype of the original type. Malicious guests can mis-type exception object payloads to corrupt the GC heap, causing Wasmtime to panic when the exceptions proposal is enabled.

  101. CVE-2026-115382 4.8 Moyenne

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime 46.0.0 before 48.0.4 and 49.0.0 before 49.0.2 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability in its wasi:http implementation that allows guests to panic the host. Guests can specify a zero between-bytes-timeout request option, which is forwarded directly to a Tokio API that panics, crashing the host embedding.

  102. CVE-2026-115381 4.8 Moyenne

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime before 36.0.17, 37.0.0 before 48.0.4, and 49.0.0 before 49.0.2 contains an unbounded memory allocation in the wasmtime-wasi WASIp2 write-zeroes method of SinkOutputStream, the default stream used when stdout/stderr are not configured. A malicious WebAssembly guest can request huge zero-filled writes, exhausting host memory and causing denial of service.

  103. CVE-2026-115380 4.0 Moyenne

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime before 36.0.17, 37.0.0 before 48.0.4, and 49.0.0 before 49.0.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the wasmtime-wasi WASI preview 0 poll_oneoff adapter, which performs O(n) host work per subscription without consuming or checking fuel. Malicious guest modules can pass many subscriptions to force long-running host computation that ignores configured fuel limits.

  104. CVE-2026-115379 5.7 Moyenne

    bytecodealliance wasmtime

    Wasmtime 47.0.0 before 48.0.4 and 49.0.0 before 49.0.2 contains a missing GC rooting vulnerability that leaves references live across try_call unrooted when compiling Wasm modules. Attackers can supply Wasm modules whose callee triggers garbage collection, leaving stale or dangling references that cause GC heap corruption or incorrect execution.

  105. CVE-2026-115378 5.8 Moyenne

    lxc incus

    Incus before 6.0.7, 6.1.0 before 7.0.2, and 7.1.0 before 7.5.0 contains an arbitrary file write vulnerability in sftpRecursivePullFile that allows a malicious incus-agent to escape the target directory during incus file pull -r. Attackers with root in a virtual machine can return duplicate entries reported first as symlinks then as files or directories, writing attacker-controlled files such as /etc/shadow on the operator's host.

  106. CVE-2026-115377 9.9 Critique

    lxc incus

    Incus before 6.0.7, 6.1.0 before 7.0.2, and 7.1.0 before 7.5.0 contains an arbitrary file write vulnerability that allows malicious migration sources to write host files by planting symlinks in transferred volumes. Attackers can craft rsync or btrfs receive streams with a symlink such as rootfs pointing to the host root, writing files as root for full host compromise.

  107. CVE-2026-115376 7.7 Élevée

    lxc incus

    Incus 7.0.1 before 7.0.2 and 7.2.0 before 7.5.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows project-restricted clients to copy volumes by omitting source.type. Attackers can send crafted POST requests to the custom volumes endpoint with a chosen source.project to copy and read other projects' volumes, snapshots, and configuration.

  108. CVE-2026-115375 9.9 Critique

    lxc incus

    Incus 7.0.0 before 7.0.2 and 7.1.0 before 7.5.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows clients able to create instances to write files on the host. The flaw stems from unvalidated dependent custom volume names in instance backup index.yaml files. Attackers can import a crafted instance backup with ../ sequences in dependent volume names to create root-owned directories with controlled content, leading to full host compromise.

  109. CVE-2026-115374 7.1 Élevée

    lxc incus

    Incus 7.0.0 before 7.0.2 and 7.1.0 before 7.5.0 contains a signature verification flaw in its built-in S3 server that allows presigned URL holders to inject unsigned x-amz-* headers. Attackers can add an unsigned X-Amz-Copy-Source header to a presigned upload URL to copy other bucket objects onto the granted key, disclosing their contents and ETags.

  110. CVE-2026-115373 6.3 Moyenne

    lxc incus

    Incus before 6.0.7, 6.1.0 before 7.0.2, and 7.1.0 before 7.5.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in GET /1.0/operations/{uuid} that lets project-restricted clients read operations in other projects. Attackers holding a restricted certificate and a known operation UUID can retrieve command lines, environment secrets, websocket secrets, and trust enrolment tokens.

  111. CVE-2026-115372 8.5 Élevée

    lxc incus

    Incus from 7.3.0 before 7.5.0 contains a project restriction bypass that allows restricted project users to set block.create_options through volume update, copy, and move operations. Attackers can set the option on a custom volume and trigger a copy or move onto a formatting pool to inject arguments into mkfs executed as root.

  112. CVE-2026-115371 7.1 Élevée

    lxc incus

    Incus 6.0.3 before 6.0.7, 6.6.0 before 7.0.2, and 7.1.0 before 7.5.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows restricted TLS clients to read storage bucket keys in the default project. Attackers can query the bucket keys endpoints to obtain S3 access and secret keys, then read, modify or delete objects in those buckets.

  113. CVE-2026-115370 4.3 Moyenne

    lxc incus

    Incus 6.0.5 before 6.0.7, 6.12.0 before 7.0.2, and 7.1.0 before 7.5.0 contains a restriction bypass vulnerability that allows restricted project users to use pull mode migration via clustered refresh requests. Attackers with instance creation rights can send a refresh migration request for an existing instance to make the server open outbound TLS websocket connections and probe reachable services.

  114. CVE-2026-115369 2.2 Faible

    openbao

    OpenBao from 2.5.0 before 2.6.2 fails to enforce the PKI role allowed_ip_sans_cidr restriction on IP SANs taken from a CSR when use_csr_sans is enabled. Authenticated callers with sign permission can submit a CSR with an out-of-range IP SAN to pki/sign/<role> and obtain CA-signed certificates for unauthorized IPs.

  115. CVE-2026-115366 2.6 Faible

    openbao

    OpenBao from 2.3.0 before 2.6.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows privileged child-namespace tokens to modify plugin registrations because /v1/sys/plugins/catalog/* is not restricted to the root namespace. Attackers can remove existing registrations, create invalid ones, or register installed plugins through a child namespace's sys/ mount, causing denial of service.

  116. CVE-2026-115365 6.6 Moyenne

    openbao

    OpenBao from 2.3.0 before 2.6.3 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in its ACL policy cache that allows tokens to reference policies from arbitrary namespaces using specially crafted policy names. Attackers holding such tokens can gain capabilities of cached policies in other namespaces, including the root namespace, to act across namespace boundaries.

  117. CVE-2026-115364 2.2 Faible

    openbao

    OpenBao before 2.6.3 contains a missing authorization check that allows attackers to stop Agent and Proxy services by omitting the X-Vault-Header. When require_request_header is enabled, attackers can send requests via server-side request forgery to /agent/v1/quit or /proxy/v1/quit to shut down these services.

  118. CVE-2026-115363 3.3 Faible

    openbao

    OpenBao 2.2.0 before 2.6.4 and 2.7.0 before 2.7.1 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that exposes the tls_acme_eab_mac_key value through the sys/config/state/sanitized endpoint. Callers of the sanitized configuration endpoint can retrieve the ACME External Account Binding MAC key used for TLS listener certificates, letting them bind to the operator's ACME account.

  119. CVE-2026-115362 2.2 Faible

    openbao

    OpenBao before 2.6.4 and 2.7.x before 2.7.1 does not check Secret ID expiration at use in the AppRole auth method, leaving expired Secret IDs valid until the periodic tidy removes them. An attacker holding an expired, untidied Secret ID can log in and gain access beyond its TTL.

  120. CVE-2026-115361 4.1 Moyenne

    openbao

    OpenBao before 2.6.3 contains an ACL bypass vulnerability that silently drops explicit deny rules based on forbidden identity metadata templates within wildcard grants. Attackers whose identity metadata contains wildcard or path segments can access paths that should be denied within the broader wildcard-granted scope.

  121. CVE-2026-115360 4.7 Moyenne

    openbao

    OpenBao before 2.6.3 contains an open redirect vulnerability in the UI's OIDC identity provider that affects users not authenticated to OpenBao. Attackers can craft OIDC links that redirect unauthenticated users to attacker-controlled destinations, enabling phishing or credential theft.

  122. CVE-2026-115359 3.7 Faible

    openbao

    OpenBao before 2.6.4 and 2.7.x before 2.7.1 contains a flaw in its rate limit quota subsystem where role resolution fails for requests with form-encoded bodies or forwarded certificates, so quota rules scoped to backend-specific roles are not enforced. Valid callers can repeatedly issue tokens without consuming the configured role-based rate limit budget.

  123. CVE-2026-115358 2.0 Faible

    openbao

    OpenBao before 2.6.3 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows attackers to leak sensitive data into audit logs by sending malformed plugin parameters. Attackers can submit requests with malformed TypeKVPair or TypeHeader field values, causing error messages containing sensitive input to be recorded in audit logs.

  124. CVE-2026-115357 2.2 Faible

    openbao

    OpenBao before 2.6.4 and 2.7.x before 2.7.1 fails to write response audit entries for the unauthenticated sys/generate-root, sys/rekey, and sys/rekey-recovery-key endpoints when request audit logging succeeds but response audit logging fails. An attacker using these endpoints can complete root token generation or rekey operations without a corresponding response audit record, hindering forensic detection.

  125. CVE-2026-115356 5.4 Moyenne

    openbao

    OpenBao before 2.6.4 and 2.7.x before 2.7.1 does not verify, when renewing a token issued by the Kubernetes Auth method, that the service account token originally used to authenticate is still valid. An authenticated attacker can keep renewing such tokens to persist access after the Kubernetes service account has been deleted.

  126. CVE-2026-115355 7.5 Élevée

    lepture mistune

    Mistune before 3.3.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the Include directive that allows attackers to read arbitrary files by supplying ../ sequences in include paths. Attackers can also inject HTML through unescaped error messages and included file contents to perform cross-site scripting even when escape=True is set.

  127. CVE-2026-115354 6.5 Moyenne

    lepture mistune

    Mistune before 3.3.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the opt-in Include directive that allows attackers to read local files by supplying relative or absolute include paths. Attackers who submit Markdown rendered via Markdown.read() can disclose files such as /etc/passwd and inject unescaped HTML or script content into rendered output.

  128. CVE-2026-115353 8.6 Élevée

    lepture mistune

    Mistune before 3.3.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the RST include directive that allows attackers to read arbitrary files by supplying relative or absolute paths. Attackers can submit markdown containing include directives referencing ../ sequences or absolute paths to embed sensitive files like credentials or environment data in rendered HTML.

  129. CVE-2026-115352 7.5 Élevée

    lepture mistune

    Mistune before 3.3.0 contains an algorithmic complexity vulnerability in the inline link parser that allows unauthenticated attackers to exhaust CPU by submitting long runs of unmatched '[' characters. Attackers can send small markdown payloads that trigger O(N^2) parse_link_text and parse_link_label probing, occupying rendering workers for 30+ seconds per 16 KB input.

  130. CVE-2026-115351 4.7 Moyenne

    lepture mistune

    Mistune from 3.2.1 before 3.3.0 contains a CSS injection vulnerability that allows attackers controlling markdown input to inject arbitrary style declarations via the unvalidated figwidth option of the figure directive. Attackers can append declarations like background:url() to the rendered figure style attribute, forcing victim browsers to send requests to attacker servers and leak attribute values.

  131. CVE-2026-115350 6.1 Moyenne

    lepture mistune

    Mistune before 3.3.0 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Include directive that emits included .html, .xhtml, or .htm file content as raw block_html tokens. Attackers who can plant an HTML file readable by the renderer can reference it via an include directive, combined with path traversal, to execute stored scripts when escape=False is set.

  132. CVE-2026-115349 7.5 Élevée

    lepture mistune

    Mistune from 3.0.0 before 3.3.0 contains an algorithmic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the parse_link_text function in src/mistune/helpers.py. Attackers can submit markdown with deeply nested square brackets triggering quadratic parsing time, exhausting server CPU with small crafted requests.

  133. CVE-2026-115348 7.5 Élevée

    lepture mistune

    Mistune from 3.0.0 before 3.3.0 contains an algorithmic complexity vulnerability in the inline link parser's parse_link_text function that allows unauthenticated attackers to exhaust CPU with unbalanced brackets. Attackers can submit Markdown containing many unbalanced '[' or '![' characters, forcing repeated unbounded forward scans and tying up worker processes for minutes.

  134. CVE-2026-115347 7.5 Élevée

    lepture mistune

    Mistune before 3.3.0 contains an inefficient algorithmic complexity vulnerability in parse_link_text that allows remote attackers to cause denial of service through unbalanced square brackets. Attackers can submit markdown containing long runs of unmatched brackets to mistune.html(), triggering repeated forward scans that stall worker processes for minutes.

  135. CVE-2026-114655 5.9 Moyenne

    MongoDB libmongocrypt

    libmongocrypt builds requests to external key management services (AWS, Azure and GCP) by inserting values from key vault documents, KMS provider configuration and KMS responses into request lines, headers and signed request bodies without validating or encoding them for each context. A user with write access to the key vault collection can alter the structure of these requests, including adding members to request bodies and token claims that the library then signs with the application's credentials. This may result in key management operations being performed with parameters the application did not intend.

  136. CVE-2026-114654 6.5 Moyenne

    MongoDB C# Driver

    A numeric-type conversion flaw in the BSON handling library of the MongoDB C# Driver allows an out-of-range binary subtype value supplied through untrusted textual input to bypass the library's binary-element integrity checks. When such a value is later encoded, it is narrowed to a smaller wire representation, producing binary elements that misdeclare their type or length. An unauthenticated party able to supply text parsed by an affected application can cause it to emit and persist malformed binary data, which subsequent readers either reject with an error or silently interpret as shorter than the data that was validated.

  137. CVE-2026-114653 6.5 Moyenne

    MongoDB C# Driver

    A client-side encryption schema construction component in the MongoDB C# Driver places caller-supplied field identifiers into a position that is interpreted as a pattern expression, without normalizing or validating them. As a result, an application that designates certain fields for client-side field-level encryption may have the protection silently fail to apply, so data intended to be encrypted is stored and returned in cleartext; conversely, the rule may apply more broadly than intended. No user action is required to cause the condition, and any party with ordinary read access to the stored data — without possession of the encryption keys — can observe the unprotected values.

  138. CVE-2026-114652 6.5 Moyenne

    MongoDB C# Driver

    A data-query-logic neutralization weakness in the update-statement construction component of the MongoDB C# Driver can cause application-supplied values to be interpreted as query/update logic rather than as literal data. An application user who can influence the content of values that the application passes into the affected builder surface, without any special privilege beyond ordinary read-write application access, may cause stored data to be modified or removed in ways the application never intended. The result is unauthorized integrity impact on the affected application data; there is no direct loss of confidentiality or availability of the database service.

  139. CVE-2026-114651 4.0 Moyenne

    MongoDB C# Driver

    A memory-handling weakness in the BSON deserialization component of the MongoDB C# Driver may cause data left over from previously processed content to be returned when specially crafted serialized input is parsed. An unauthenticated party able to supply serialized data to an application that maps certain primitive collection types can cause residual bytes from unrelated data processed earlier on the same execution thread to be surfaced as legitimate values. This can result in disclosure of a limited amount of information belonging to other requests or principals of the consuming application. No authentication or special privileges within the application are required.

  140. CVE-2026-114650 5.9 Moyenne

    MongoDB C# Driver

    A flaw in the client-side encryption support of the MongoDB .NET/C# driver can cause data designated for client-side field-level encryption to be written without encryption. Under certain platform text-encoding configurations, an internal name conversion loses information, so the encryption layer fails to associate the operation with its configured encryption rules and the operation proceeds without an error being raised. An application user with the ability to write data through an affected application can therefore have sensitive fields persisted in plaintext, defeating the confidentiality guarantee that client-side encryption is intended to provide. No integrity or availability impact was observed.

  141. CVE-2026-114649 6.8 Moyenne

    MongoDB C# Driver

    The MongoDB C# Driver compares TLS client certificates by issuer and serial number only when deciding whether two clients can share cached connections. In an application that creates clients from certificates supplied by different users, a user who provides a certificate copying another user's issuer and serial number, without that user's private key, can be given connections authenticated with the other user's certificate. Database operations can then run under the other user's identity, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of data that identity can access.

  142. CVE-2026-114648 7.6 Élevée

    MongoDB C# Driver

    The MongoDB C# Driver does not neutralize dot and dollar characters in dictionary keys, field names and array-filter identifiers used in LINQ queries before placing them into the field paths it sends to the server. An application user whose input reaches these positions can redirect a query or update to fields the application did not name, which can expose other users' documents and widen updates beyond the intended data. Certain values can also write malformed fields that leave stored documents unreadable by the application until they are repaired.

  143. CVE-2026-114647 4.3 Moyenne

    MongoDB C# Driver

    The MongoDB C# Driver does not reject replacement documents whose top-level field names begin with a dollar sign in FindOneAndReplace, unlike other replace operations. An application that builds such a document from user-supplied field names can have the server apply update operators instead of a full replacement. The effect is limited to the document matched by the application's own filter, whose contents can be modified in ways the application did not intend.

  144. CVE-2026-114646 6.5 Moyenne

    MongoDB C# Driver

    A data-validation flaw exists in the BSON handling and binary serialization path of the MongoDB C# Driver. When an application constructs a raw or lazy BSON document object from externally supplied binary data, the driver does not verify that the size quantity declared inside that data matches the amount of data actually provided, and it copies the data onto the wire unchanged. An unauthenticated party who can supply binary content to such an application can thereby cause additional elements to be inserted into, or existing elements to be removed from, the database command the application issues, without needing any database credentials of their own. This can result in unauthorized modification of stored data and disclosure of data outside the intended scope of the application's request, bounded by the database privileges the application itself holds.

  145. CVE-2026-114645 5.2 Moyenne

    MongoDB C Driver

    A 32-bit integer wraparound in the MongoDB C Driver's Windows-only Kerberos/SSPI authentication code can cause an undersized heap buffer to be allocated when an excessively long credential value is supplied in the client's connection configuration. A party able to control that client-side configuration, in conjunction with the affected authentication mechanism, can cause the driver to write outside the bounds of the allocated buffer. This may result in corruption of client process memory and denial of service of the client application. The issue affects only client builds compiled with the Windows-native authentication backend.

  146. CVE-2026-114644 5.9 Moyenne

    MongoDB C# Driver

    The MongoDB C# Driver's BSON library contains an uncontrolled resource consumption weakness in its deserialization handling of one BSON value type. An application that deserializes untrusted content with the library retains data derived from that content for the lifetime of the process, with no limit on how much accumulates. An unauthenticated remote party who can cause such content to be deserialized can drive unbounded memory growth, exhausting the host application's available memory and denying service. There is no impact to confidentiality or integrity, and no MongoDB server component is affected.

  147. CVE-2026-114643 5.4 Moyenne

    MongoDB C# Driver

    The MongoDB C# Driver writes GeoJSON extra members without checking whether their names collide with reserved GeoJSON members such as type and coordinates. An application that places user-supplied field names into these extra members can store documents with duplicate geometry fields, so the server and the driver resolve different values for the same record. Affected records can also become unreadable through the driver, interrupting application code that reads them.

  148. CVE-2026-114613 7.5 Élevée

    msgpack-python

    MessagePack is the serializer implementation for Python msgpack.org. Prior to 1.2.3, the msgpack-python C extension (msgpack._cmsgpack) leaks a decoded map value when deserialization rejects a key with strict_map_key=True (the default). Repeated malformed inputs can cause unbounded process memory growth and denial of service in applications that deserialize attacker-controlled MessagePack data. Both unpackb() and the streaming Unpacker API are affected. The pure-Python fallback does not exhibit this leak in the reported tests. This issue is fixed in version 1.2.3.

  149. CVE-2026-114612 9.9 Critique

    BerriAI litellm

    LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From 1.87.0 until 1.100.4, 1.101.3, 1.102.2, 1.103.1, and 1.104.0-rc.2, the proxy reuses one cryptographic context for at-rest secrets and session tokens, allowing an authenticated internal user to have crafted metadata containing a forged administrator credential encrypted and returned by the API-key flow. Replaying that ciphertext as a bearer token causes the proxy to trust the forged proxy administrator identity, permitting administrative access and arbitrary commands through the MCP stdio endpoint. Versions 1.87.0 through 1.90.x require EXPERIMENTAL_UI_LOGIN to be enabled, while versions after 1.91.0 are exploitable in the default configuration. This issue was fixed in LiteLLM 1.100.4, 1.101.3, 1.102.2, 1.103.1, and 1.104.0-rc.2.

  150. CVE-2026-114519 8.6 Élevée

    Roskus Prospero Flow CRM

    Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in the user API of Roskus Prospero Flow CRM from 2.0.0 before 5.26.0 allows a user with a basic role to read the accounts of other users of its own company, including accounts with higher privileges, and, in versions from 3.5.0, to delete them, because the routes GET /api/user/{id} and DELETE /api/user/{id} in routes/api.php carry only the auth:api middleware, which checks that a JSON Web Token is valid and nothing more, and neither UserReadController::read() nor UserDeleteController::delete() checks a permission, a policy or a role before acting. Object access is scoped by company: the read path limits the query to the company of the authenticated user, and the delete path compares the company of the target account with the company of the authenticated user. The delete path skips that comparison when the company of the authenticated user is Company::DEFAULT_COMPANY, so a user with a basic role in that company can delete any account of any company of the installation. Deleting an account removes the data held on it, and the last administrative account of a company can be deleted. This gives the attacker the personal data held on the other accounts, including email address, telephone number, postal address and IBAN, and the ability to delete accounts it has no permission to administer.