Veille CVE

Jeudi 16 juillet 2026

19 CVE sur 245

  1. CVE-2026-12906 2.7 Faible

    Unknown RTMKit

    The RTMKit WordPress plugin before 2.0.9 does not perform a capability check in one of its AJAX actions and resolves a request-supplied post identifier directly, allowing users with at least the Contributor role to read the titles of other users' private, draft, pending, scheduled and trashed posts.

  2. CVE-2026-33444 3.7 Faible

    Absolute Secutity Secure Access · Absolute secure access

    CVE-2026-33444 is a memory management vulnerability in Secure Access servers prior to 14.55. Attackers with intimate knowledge of and total control over the tunnel protocol can create a non-persistent DoS against the server.

  3. CVE-2026-55398 3.7 Faible

    Absolute Security Secure Access · Absolute secure access

    CVE-2026-55398 is a memory management vulnerability in Secure Access clients and servers prior to 14.55. Attackers with intimate knowledge of and total control over the tunnel protocol can create a non-persistent DoS against the server.

  4. CVE-2026-12907 2.7 Faible

    Unknown RTMKit

    The RTMKit WordPress plugin before 2.0.9 does not perform a proper capability check on one of its -builder AJAX actions, allowing users with at least the Author role to create and activate a site-wide template that overrides the header, footer or other global areas displayed to all visitors, which is normally restricted to administrators.

  5. CVE-2026-55035 3.3 Faible

    Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise · Microsoft Office 2016 · Microsoft Office 2019 · Microsoft Office 365 for Mac

    Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

  6. CVE-2026-55139 3.3 Faible

    Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise · Microsoft Office 2016 · Microsoft Office 2019 · Microsoft Office 365 for Mac

    Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

  7. CVE-2026-50665 3.3 Faible

    Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise · Microsoft Office 2016 · Microsoft Office 2019 · Microsoft Office 365 for Mac

    Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

  8. CVE-2026-56193 3.3 Faible

    Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise · Microsoft Office 2016 · Microsoft Office 2019 · Microsoft Office 365 for Mac

    Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

  9. CVE-2026-13235 3.3 Faible

    Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) · Artificial intelligence project artificial intelligence

    Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects AI (Artificial Intelligence) versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.2.17, from 1.3.0 to 1.3.8, from 1.4.0 to 1.4.3.

  10. CVE-2026-55807 3.1 Faible

    Drupal core · Drupal drupal

    Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 0.0.0 to 10.5.12, from 10.6.0 to 10.6.11, from 11.2.0 to 11.2.14, from 11.3.0 to 11.3.12, from 0.0.0 to 11.0.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.1.*.

  11. CVE-2026-40958 3.7 Faible

    Absolute Security Secure Access · Absolute secure access

    CVE-2026-40958 is a input validation error in Secure Access clients prior to 14.55. Attackers with intimate knowledge of and total control over the tunnel protocol can create a non-persistent DoS against their client.

  12. CVE-2026-40956 3.7 Faible

    Absolute Security Secure Access · Absolute secure access

    CVE-2026-40956 is a memory disclosure vulnerability in Secure Access client versions prior to 14.55. Attackers with intimate knowledge of and total control over the tunnel protocol can cause a small amount of random memory to leak.

  13. CVE-2026-40955 3.7 Faible

    Absolute Security Secure Access · Absolute secure access

    CVE-2026-40955 is an integer underflow vulnerability in the traffic parsing function of Secure Access clients prior to 14.55. Attackers with intimate knowledge of and total control over the tunnel protocol can create a non-persistent DoS against their client.

  14. CVE-2026-40954 3.7 Faible

    Absolute Security Secure Access · Absolute secure access

    CVE-2026-40954 is an integer underflow vulnerability in the traffic parsing function of Secure Access clients prior to 14.55. Attackers with intimate knowledge of and total control over the tunnel protocol can create a non-persistent DoS against their client

  15. CVE-2026-15921 3.1 Faible

    nvm-sh nvm

    Node Version Manager (nvm) is a POSIX-compliant shell function for managing multiple node.js versions. In versions 0.32.1 through 0.40.5, `nvm ls-remote` (and other commands that refresh remote LTS aliases, such as `nvm install --lts`) parse the node.js mirror's `index.tab` and use each release's LTS codename field as an alias filename without validating it. A malicious, compromised, or man-in-the-middled mirror can return an LTS codename containing path-traversal sequences such as `../../../.bashrc`, causing nvm to write the associated version string to a path outside `$NVM_DIR/alias`. With the default layout (`$NVM_DIR` is `~/.nvm`), this can create or overwrite files in the user's home directory, including shell startup files, which can lead to code execution in a later shell session. Exploitation requires the victim to use a hostile mirror -- via a compromised mirror or CDN, a network man-in-the-middle, or a maliciously configured `NVM_NODEJS_ORG_MIRROR`/`NVM_IOJS_ORG_MIRROR` -- and to run an affected command. Version 0.40.6 validates remote LTS codenames as safe alias filenames and rejects `..` path components when writing alias files.

  16. CVE-2026-14686 3.3 Faible

    HdrHistogram

    A vulnerability was found in HdrHistogram up to 2.2.2. This issue affects the function org.HdrHistogram.DoubleHistogram.recordValue of the file src/main/java/org/HdrHistogram/DoubleHistogram.java of the component Range Check. Performing a manipulation results in incorrect comparison. The attack is only possible with local access. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The presence of this vulnerability remains uncertain at this time. This issue is disputed due to the potential lack of crossing of security boundaries and the pre-requisites for a successful attack.

  17. CVE-2026-14685 3.3 Faible

    HdrHistogram

    A vulnerability has been found in HdrHistogram up to 2.2.2. This vulnerability affects the function recordValueWithCount of the file src/main/java/org/HdrHistogram/AbstractHistogram.java of the component AbstractHistogram. Such manipulation of the argument Count leads to state issue. The attack can only be performed from a local environment. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The existence of this vulnerability is still disputed at present. This issue is disputed due to the potential lack of crossing of security boundaries and the pre-requisites for a successful attack.

  18. CVE-2026-14684 3.3 Faible

    HdrHistogram

    A flaw has been found in HdrHistogram up to 2.2.2. This affects the function org.HdrHistogram.AbstractHistogram.decodeFromByteBuffer of the file src/main/java/org/HdrHistogram/AbstractHistogram.java. This manipulation of the argument numberOfSignificantValueDigits causes uncontrolled memory allocation. The attack can only be executed locally. The exploit has been published and may be used. The actual existence of this vulnerability is currently in question. This issue is disputed due to the potential lack of crossing of security boundaries and the pre-requisites for a successful attack.

  19. CVE-2026-14683 3.3 Faible

    HdrHistogram

    A vulnerability was detected in HdrHistogram up to 2.2.2. Affected by this issue is the function org.HdrHistogram.AbstractHistogram.decodeFromCompressedByteBuffer of the file src/main/java/org/HdrHistogram/AbstractHistogram.java. The manipulation of the argument lengthOfCompressedContents results in uncontrolled memory allocation. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit is now public and may be used. It is still unclear if this vulnerability genuinely exists. This issue is disputed due to the potential lack of crossing of security boundaries and the pre-requisites for a successful attack.